Welcome to the new Film-Tech Forums!
The forum you are looking at is entirely new software. Because there was no good way to import all of the old archived data from the last 20 years on the old software, everyone will need to register for a new account to participate.
To access the original forums from 1999-2019 which are now a "read only" status, click on the "FORUM ARCHIVE" link above.
Please remember registering with your first and last REAL name is mandatory. This forum is for professionals and fake names are not permitted. To get to the registration page click here.
Once the registration has been approved, you will be able to login via the link in the upper right corner of this page.
Also, please remember while it is highly encouraged to upload an avatar image to your profile, is not a requirement. If you choose to upload an avatar image, please remember that it IS a requirement that the image must be a clear photo of your face.
Thank you!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Making a fake movie to understand Hollywood’s shady accounting
Making a fake movie to understand Hollywood’s shady accounting
For years there has been a deliberate practice among Hollywood studios to use tricky accounting and tax loopholes to make it seem like many movies they make end up as losses. Exempting them from paying taxes on production costs, and getting them out of profit sharing deals with actors and directors. But how do these tax loopholes and accounting tricks work? And should we try to close them?
Max Bialystock has moved from Broadway to Hollywood.
It's the old "rolling break even" game. More than just the movie industry does it. The music industry is infected even worse. Many music artists don't see a dime from their album or streaming sales; they have to make a living by touring and selling merchandise. The music labels are trying to get as much of that money as possible too.
Comment