Welcome to the new Film-Tech Forums!
The forum you are looking at is entirely new software. Because there was no good way to import all of the old archived data from the last 20 years on the old software, everyone will need to register for a new account to participate.
To access the original forums from 1999-2019 which are now a "read only" status, click on the "FORUM ARCHIVE" link above.
Please remember registering with your first and last REAL name is mandatory. This forum is for professionals and fake names are not permitted. To get to the registration page click here.
Once the registration has been approved, you will be able to login via the link in the upper right corner of this page.
Also, please remember while it is highly encouraged to upload an avatar image to your profile, is not a requirement. If you choose to upload an avatar image, please remember that it IS a requirement that the image must be a clear photo of your face.
Thank you!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Lab decides that Dolby Digital is too much work for the last minute?
I thought only US prints of Southpark had SDDS printed on them. Is the opening logo Paramount or WB? Also the SDDS portion of your print there is on Fuji, but US prints were to the best of my knowledge all struck on Kodak stock. What stock is the non-SDDS portion printed on?
Also isn't that a reel change point?
Hi Brad,
It's an english language Print from the Warner Germany Archive.
Only reel 3 has SDDS, the other reels have SRD/DTS. All reels were printed on Fujicolor Polyester Stock. Reel 1 opens with the WB Logo.
I thought only US prints of Southpark had SDDS printed on them. Is the opening logo Paramount or WB? Also the SDDS portion of your print there is on Fuji, but US prints were to the best of my knowledge all struck on Kodak stock. What stock is the non-SDDS portion printed on?
The very moment you seat people infront of the screen on the stadium, you[r] achievable contrast is diminished. These ugly, greasy faces reflect so much light back, and it's even worse in a stadium, than in a classic floor curve​
LOL
I don't know about Germany, but here in the U.S., at most chains, the amount of light reflected back onto the screen from patrons is insignificant compared to the amount of light shining directly onto the screen from the floor lights, exit lights, and wall decorations.
Yes - but you still need the Dolby encoded Printmaster file for it to be able to do it. The Cinevator can do Dolby Digital in two ways - firstly by hooking up the Dolby CA-10 to the Cinevator, similar to how you'd hook up a CA-10 to a sound camera if recording a sound negative. Or secondly, if the Cinevator has the modern fancy DSA35 sound option, then you can skip the CA-10 and have the Cinevator read the Printmaster file directly.
I was aware that you could do Dolby Digital with a Cinevator, although I've never heard about the DSA35 option. My question was a bit more specific, regarding real-time recording to 35mm from digital sources, which is something that Cinevator has as a unique feature. It's not really an important feature nowadays, as we've got plenty of high-capacity and high-speed digital storage options, so it was more a question out of curiosity if it could be done with SRD, in real-time.
Doing "SRD" in real-time strikes me as a difficult process, because the way metadata is interleaved into the format.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the CA-10 reads the Dolby Digital track from an MO disk. That process hasn't really been modernized by Dolby afaik and that process isn't a real-time process.
I don't really know anything about the "DSA35 option", but the thing I googled looks like this also works with pre-processed files and not a live, streaming source.
Regarding the general print quality of the Cinevator: I wasn't aware if they continued development, but you obviously can't compare it to an ArriLaser 4K in terms of contrast. Even the latest iterations of CRT film-scanners had pretty good contrast. Keep in mind that CRT-based technology was actually still considered as a viable option in the first generation of Digital Cinema Projectors. DLP simply beat every other technology in pure light efficiency, at the cost of contrast...
I know some labs and local distributors used those machines for low-cost 35mm production. Given what niche 35mm film has become, I guess it's good there are a few "budget options" still available to produce it from modern media sources.
When I went for THX training in the 1990's, they taught us that when running a new to you film, that one should always listen to a reel or two of the movie through SRD and also through regular SR decoding. Because quite often the SR decoding sounds better. They were correct... They came out to check the first system I installed and they wanted to hear stuff. first. The movie was Twister, and we ended up playing it in Analog SR. So never assume the SRD track is the best to use, and in this case not having the SRD track really didn't matter anyway.
Contrast ratio is important, more important than resolution for the perfect image perception.
You can try hard, you can use Eclipse projectors and Dolby Vision, have a totally matted, black hall, the security lighting turned off. The very moment you seat people infront of the screen on the stadium, you
achievable contrast is diminished. These ugly, greasy faces reflect so much light back, and it's even worse in a stadium, than in a classic floor curve. From the 6/ 7 digit to 1 figure, we end up at low 4, or even
3 digit figures.
In a home theatre room, with only a couple of faces it can work pretty well, and a lot of what is available can be saved.
So all discussion in theatrical exhibition is theory, overwritten by the reality. We still have to aim for the best source, as this in the end will lead to the best under given condition in the hall.
Cinevator and it's limited recorder contrast is not among it. It might work for PSA snipes, but I doubt it works in great features.
I was stunned by a 2015 Indian film, shot on Kodak, printed on 2393, the print serial number in the 2 digit range 8Down from higher 4 digits)- amazed how contrasty, colorful and bright an
image on film could actually look with latest chemical technology.
Unlike what we got in series printing until 2013, which simply looked desaturated and low contrasty. AS if they were trying to say, buy the new DLP, it's better.
Well, the problem with all Cinevator prints I've seen so far is that it is basically stuck with ca. 2008 DLP technology, hence I always found the black levels awful and also the contrast rather limited.
For someone who still remembers how good even standard release prints 20-25 years could look in terms of color & contast those prints just seem like a waste of film.
Prints made using the Arrilaser / I.N. workflow almost always seemed to look a lot better to me. But it's also a way more expensive way to struck prints.
It also comes down to the print stock - we had a print of The Godfather struck on Kodak 2393 on an ArriLaser 4k in the mid-2000s and the black levels were incredible - I could not tell the difference between the edge of a dark scene and the edge of our aperture plate on-screen when we pulled the masking back. 250k:1 must have been incredible when 2393 was new, and still puts our digital projector to shame - sad its discontinued now.
Well, the problem with all Cinevator prints I've seen so far is that it is basically stuck with ca. 2008 DLP technology, hence I always found the black levels awful and also the contrast rather limited.
For someone who still remembers how good even standard release prints 20-25 years could look in terms of color & contast those prints just seem like a waste of film.
Prints made using the Arrilaser / I.N. workflow almost always seemed to look a lot better to me. But it's also a way more expensive way to struck prints.
Does it feel more wrong than prints from an Arrilaser, given we now have laser projection? Or a CRT recorder (which I think IMAX still use)?
I really don't know how those things work and I can imagine that in such a small setup with very little light involved, a DLP can behave much better than with 30k lumens involved.
CRT recorder... well, I guess if you print from digital it cannot be a fully analogue workflow!
Can a modern Cinevator do real-time Dolby Digital? Just curious...
Yes - but you still need the Dolby encoded Printmaster file for it to be able to do it. The Cinevator can do Dolby Digital in two ways - firstly by hooking up the Dolby CA-10 to the Cinevator, similar to how you'd hook up a CA-10 to a sound camera if recording a sound negative. Or secondly, if the Cinevator has the modern fancy DSA35 sound option, then you can skip the CA-10 and have the Cinevator read the Printmaster file directly.
Can a modern Cinevator do real-time Dolby Digital? Just curious...
Yes- - The Cinevator can output both DolbyDigital™ and DTS sound tracks, in real time, although you'll need
to source the necessary interface from Dolby and/or the time code generator from DTS to record those formats.
Leave a comment: