my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Mr. Woodcock (2007)

Author Topic: Mr. Woodcock (2007) Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 09-14-2007 05:06 PM                     This was pretty much exactly what I thought it would be. Stupid and not really very entertaining, but not SO horrible that I couldn't sit through it. I really am starting to hate Stiffler...I mean Sean William Scott. He plays the same godamn retard in every movie, and it's just not funny. (Although MUCH funnier than anything Chris Tucker has ever done.) I only wanted to see this for Billy Bob Thornton. Sure he is playing a similar role to many of his previous films, but it is usually fairly entertaining and after the hilarious Bad Santa I will continue to watch his films in the hopes of even finding another half as funny. Unfortunately this movie isn't funny, and Billy Bob's performance was about the only thing entertaining in it at all. 2 out of 5  |  IP: Logged Frank Dubrois Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 896 From: Cleveland, OH Registered: Mar 2005 posted 09-17-2007 03:19 PM                    This movie was very funny. You really have to like Billy Bob to get the most out of it. In fact, you have to like Billy Bob to find it funny at all. I'm a huge fan of his... 4/5  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-17-2007 06:55 PM                        I'm not a huge Billy Bob Thronton fan, but this seems like the perfect movie role for him. Anything would be better than that Bad News Bears thing he did a while ago, or whatever it was.  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Jorgenson Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1002 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: Feb 2005 posted 09-18-2007 01:22 PM                        Actually, Mike ... Bad News Bears was better than this! Woodcock (rather than Rush Hour 3) would have been the better movie to go reel by reel showing how reliant on formula & bad filmmaking techniques the film is ... but I don't care enough to actually do that.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.