Topic Closed

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Is Simplex Still KING?

Author Topic: Is Simplex Still KING? Jim Somich Film Handler Posts: 7 From: Macedonia Ohio USA Registered: Jan 2006 posted 08-26-2006 10:14 AM                     I grew up believing that Simplex made the best projectors. They seemed to run forever. Every model has a history that seems to be unmatched for performance and longevity. I believe the pinnacle of success for Simplex was the XL back in the 50s. My question is, what would be your opinion of Simplex today in 2006? It seems like they are out of the limelight since being bought out. The review of the Millenium on this site is less than glowing. Most ops seem to feel the Kinoton is a vastly superior machine. Anyone out there running newer Simplexes? What is your opinion of them compared with the alternatives. Also, I might ask the same question about Century.  |  IP: Logged Chad M Calpito Master Film Handler Posts: 435 From: San Diego, CA Registered: Apr 2006 posted 08-26-2006 10:22 AM                        Through my entire time as a projectionist, I have been using the Simplex 35 Projectors with the 5-Star sound heads as well as the Simplex Millenium Projectors. I like these machines very much. Currently, I am also using the Century JJ Series Projector as well and it is still running great. Oh yeah, I forgot to mention, I even used the Christie Projectors, too. Anyway, I heard some good things about others such as Cinemeccanica's & Kinoton's as well. So far, the Simplex Projectors keep on running great with proper maintenance and care. I think these projectors are great, but, I am sure there are projectors that are most likely better than the Simplex Projectors.  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 08-26-2006 11:11 AM                        There are several topics here, where the best/worst is discussed. You'll find that EVERYONE has their favorite. Top honors however, have to go to Kinoton... because that's Brad's fav!! Go back far enough... you'll even find the Brenkert and Motiograph afficionados. Even (gasp) one or two who think the PRO35 is pretty special... though I suspect that's because they're also in the parts business  |  IP: Logged Steve Scott Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1300 From: Minneapolis, MN Registered: Sep 2000 posted 08-26-2006 12:00 PM                     We use three simplex machines in a 5-screen house. The newest machine, circa 1999 seems much similar to our late 60's model. The only major differences being the Kelmar changevoer & laminated casting. The casting is an improvement, as the newer machine is much less of a leaker. Our older 50's XL, the precursor model to the 35, is built better than either machine. The inside of the head doesn't have a gap between it and the shutter housing, as it acts as a great dirt trap in newer models. It also serves to note of the 5-star soundheads on what one might say is a majority of simplex units (?) Those pinch rollers suck big. They also suck up the dirt that falls from an open gate, either being cleaned or threaded, it doesn't matter, it's probably going to find its way into that soundhead. Our new model's pinch roller guide flanges don't conform to some trailers & casue the soundtracks to be encased in noise. Bad news for lack of trailer discs at any given point in time. And how packed those get with digital basement readers. That's an operator's point of view. We have the old XL on an SH-1000 and it is fantastic if not reference of our 5 auditoria. Compared to the 5-Star, you can see the inadequacy of the film's routing in the new head. And compared to other heads on the market, I'd rather put a century R3 in any working multi. Just more standardized & easy to thread. I can also see the improvement in gate weave with Century's. Despite the difference in shutter efficiency, that makes Century a better domestic projector buy. But yeah, Kinotons seem to be the modern booth choice.  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 08-26-2006 02:00 PM                     Simplex has gone downhill ever since Strong bought International Projector Corporation. The most outstanding example of poor design is the Apogee. Give me a Motiograph anytime. I'm sorry they bit the dust.  |  IP: Logged Adam Martin I'm not even gonna point out the irony. Posts: 3686 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 08-26-2006 02:43 PM                     Continue this discussion in one of the existing threads.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.