Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » My first IMAX experience (Page 2)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: My first IMAX experience
Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 09-02-2005 03:16 AM      Profile for Joseph L. Kleiman   Email Joseph L. Kleiman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There are three types of IMAX projectors.

The GT (Grand Theatre) is a traditional IMAX projector based upon the kind used at Cinesphere ( here it is with Gordon ). There are four basic variations on the GT: 2D, 3D, Dome, and HD, which can project at 48fps.

IMAX SR is a smaller system made up of two separate projectors (SR stands for Small Rotor) and was designed primarily for cineplexes in smaller cities.

IMAX MPX is designed to be retrofitted into an existing multiplex (thus MPX) 35mm auditorium.

As for seeing a 65mm sourced film, of the three currently playing at Virginia Air and Space, see Fighter Pilot. Charlie, which you've seen already, was filmed in 35mm and Aliens of the Deep was filmed in digital (this may be a great opportunity to compare and contrast).

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Lensenmayer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1605
From: Upper Arlington, OH
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 09-02-2005 06:45 AM      Profile for Mark Lensenmayer   Email Mark Lensenmayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The main difference between classic IMAX and the newer versions is the height of the screen. The original IMAX screens are about twice the height of the smaller versions. For DMR films, there isn't much difference, but you will REALLY see a difference on anything designed for IMAX directly. Even the old classics like TO FLY have quite an impact! Take Joe's recommendation and check it out.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Michael Weidemann
Expert cat molester

Posts: 944
From: Costa Mesa, CA United States
Registered: Feb 2004


 - posted 09-02-2005 07:38 AM      Profile for Brian Michael Weidemann   Author's Homepage   Email Brian Michael Weidemann   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Fighter Pilot: Operation Red Flag was a good movie, and definitely has some crisp shots, full frame, definitely shot on 65mm for 15/70. The difference between that and the look of Aliens of the Deep is considerable, and Aliens doesn't even fill the full frame.

But then, you can't blame Cameron for not being able to take several IMAX 3D cameras to those extreme environments (do there still only exist something like two of them, by the way?). I think he caught some great footage for that movie, and the number of angles is impressive, considering the extreme environments. You can tell that it was a huge operation. Digital was definitely the best route he could have gone.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-02-2005 10:08 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joseph said "The GT (Grand Theatre) is a traditional IMAX projector based upon the kind used at Cinesphere ( here it is with Gordon ). There are four basic variations on the GT: 2D, 3D, Dome, and HD, which can project at 48fps"

Actually that is called the "classic" and has two versions the 4K aircooled there is a pix of the one in bradford UK in the thread of pictures of Ians trip and the watercooled like cinesphere has

The GT is a twin rotor machine designed for 3D and the stacked rotor allowed the almost total reduction of keystone related distortion in the superimpossed images for 3d as well as facilitated the shutter system for the LCD glasses

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 09-02-2005 10:45 AM      Profile for Joseph L. Kleiman   Email Joseph L. Kleiman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm going to ask Gordon to correct this if I miss or misstate anything.

IMAX projection systems:

Classic (2D)
Dome
GT (2D/3D - stacked rotors)
Solido (3D dome with E3D)
GT HD (2D/3D - 48fps)
HD Dome (Back to the Future)
HD Dome 3D (Race for Atlantis)
Magic Carpet (2 classic, 1 under floor)
Ridefilm (48fps VistaVision - now serviced by Simex)
SR (2D/3D - 2 separate projectors synched for 3D, only one used for 2D)
MPX (2D/3D - stacked rotors w/autothreading)

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Stawiarski
Film Handler

Posts: 62
From: MW
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 09-02-2005 12:28 PM      Profile for Robert Stawiarski     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
-The SR uses two projectors for 2D when a changeover is involved -- this allows the SR theatres to play the longer DMR films without having a fully upgraded QTRU.

-There is also an SR Dome theatre, which uses a single projector obviously. The one I know about is at the Science Station in Cedar Rapids, IA, but there might be others.

-Also, there are Classic 3D systems, which is two Classics side-by-side like an SR setup. The first IMAX 3D system was at the CN IMAX Theatre in Vancouver, and that uses two Classics.

You can see both of the above in the "Post your booth pictures!" thread at the 1570.com Technical Issues forum.

The rest of your list looks correct, but I am not familiar with Ridefilm or Magic Carpet.

Oh, and since I recently have ridden this... Soarin' Over California at Disney's California Aventure and its sister ride Soarin' at Epcot, use the HD Dome system. I believe Iwerks was originally supposed to install the California system, but Disney decided to switch to IMAX when they were unable to.

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 09-02-2005 01:12 PM      Profile for Joseph L. Kleiman   Email Joseph L. Kleiman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Where's the SR Dome projector located? I've heard of it before, but don't know where it's located.

Doug Trumbull's Ridefilm Corporation merged with IMAX in 1994, when the company was bought by Wechsler and Gelfond. Projectors were manufactured by Ballantyne, but serviced by IMAX techs.

There's only one Magic Carpet theater in operation - at Futuroscope in France.

There was also an earlier IMAX Dome HD ride at Phatasialand in Germany, called GALAXY.

Disney currently has six IMAX Dome HD projectors in operation: two each for Soarin' in California and Florida and the two for Storm Rider at Tokyo Disney Sea. I have been told that two of the projectors are actually the ones that originally were in EPCOT's Horizons pavillion, but have not been able to confirm this.

Gordon, James Neihouse lists your projector as being HD. Is this correct?

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Stawiarski
Film Handler

Posts: 62
From: MW
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 09-02-2005 02:18 PM      Profile for Robert Stawiarski     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The SR Dome that I know about is at the Science Station in Cedar Rapids, IA, but there might be others.

You can see this and the 3D Classic system in the "Post your booth pictures!" thread at the 1570.com Technical Issues forum.

This was in my original post after I edited it soon after I posted it; you probably started replying before seeing the edited version. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 09-02-2005 02:22 PM      Profile for Joseph L. Kleiman   Email Joseph L. Kleiman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm a bit flustered today, so I've been reading and typing fairly rapidly and just missed that line. [Frown] I've been trying for the past two days to locate the staff from the Entergy IMAX in New Orleans to make sure they're ok.

That SR Dome projector just looks wierd. I'm surprised there's no photos of that monster platter unit in Lincoln Square on the thread.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 09-02-2005 02:45 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Carey Barber
I had assumed that this was a full size IMAX (is it not?)
Seeing this part of your question was only vaguely answered, I'll give it a stab.

Charlie and most (maybe all?) DMR films are letterboxed to match the aspect ratio it was intended to be shown in 35mm theatres (1.85 for C&TCF). Most films shot specifically for 15/70 exhibition (and most of the screens for most LF auditoriums) are "narrower" or "taller" depending on how you look at it - I think 1.44:1 (I'm sure somebody will correct that aspect ratio if I'm wrong). So, yes, Charlie was still using the same size 15/70 film as any other IMAX film, but it was letterboxed.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-02-2005 03:12 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes our machine was the one they played with to make 48fps work [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Stawiarski
Film Handler

Posts: 62
From: MW
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 09-02-2005 04:11 PM      Profile for Robert Stawiarski     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jeremy -- Apollo 13 and Attack of the Clones were both pan and scanned for the DMR releases to fill up more of the screen. All the rest of the DMRs were shown in their native aspect ratios, as far as I know. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Joseph L. Kleiman
Master Film Handler

Posts: 380
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Apr 2005


 - posted 09-02-2005 04:40 PM      Profile for Joseph L. Kleiman   Email Joseph L. Kleiman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Apollo 13 was reframed for 4:3. However, it was still exhibited letterboxed at 1.66:1. Attack of the Clones was remastered from the 1.81:1 version because it used more of the IMAX screen than the anamorphic version, but it was not reframed for 4:3 like Apollo 13.

This list compiled by Bill Kallay on fromscripttodvd. com gives the aspect ratios of every commerical IMAX release. You'll notice they've all been letterboxed.

As for Magic Carpet, I've attached the only photo on me at the moment. Sorry for the really bad resolution. One traditional IMAX screen in front, with a second visible below the floor.

 -

[ 09-02-2005, 06:47 PM: Message edited by: Joseph L. Kleiman ]

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 09-02-2005 10:03 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Robert & Joseph - thanks for the info. I did not see either Apollo 13 or Episode II for their DMR releases.

That magic carpet auditorium looks interesting. I'll have to check it out, next time I'm in France. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Larry Myers
Master Film Handler

Posts: 371
From: Herndon, VA, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 09-15-2005 01:45 PM      Profile for Larry Myers         Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry to say I am a size doesn't matter kind of guy. All images have a tradeoff of scale vs resolution. This means, you can make up for image size with resolution.

So a 35mm motion picture frame with a resolution of 60 lines pairs per millimeter is exactly the same as a IMAX 15 perf frame at 20 line pairs per millmeter or about a 3 times enlargement or 9 times area.

The problem is, most IMAX frames with an IMAX camera would have a normal resolution of 60 lp/mm. So in order to get a typical 35mm motion picture camera running Super35 to do IMAX type work, the image resolution has to be about 180 lp/mm. Some color aerial recon films will do this but the ASA speed would be around 5 or so. The ASA 50 Vision stocks are good for about 120 lp/mm. Close but no cigar

On the CBS evening news about a month ago, the person of the week was a photographer who installed a 9 inch aerial recon film cassette on a 8x10 studio camera. He was taking color images of landscapes and blowing them up to 4x6 feet as photo art. CBS made a big deal out of clearly seeing in the picture, the eyes of a horse 2 miles away.

A perfect example of scale vs resolution.

Larry

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.