|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Rotten Tomatoes seeks proof you saw the movie you're rating
|
Frank Cox
Film God
Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011
|
posted 05-23-2019 12:40 PM
Rotten Tomatoes seeks proof you saw the movie you're rating
quote:
More changes are coming to review site Rotten Tomatoes. As of Thursday, the audience score for new movies added to the site will default to show ratings from fans confirmed to have purchased tickets to those films.
"The goal is to strengthen consumer confidence around that audience score," said Greg Ferris, vice president of product for Rotten Tomatoes' parent company, Fandango.
The Rotten Tomatoes audience score will now show the rating from verified ticket purchasers as its default. Users can click on the tab marked "all audience" to see the combined score from all audience reviews.
Rotten Tomatoes
Here's how it'll work: Any site user will still be able to write a review of a film. But now users can opt to have their rating and review marked as "verified."
That means they bought their film ticket on Fandango, the movie-ticketing site that owns Rotten Tomatoes. Later this year, AMC Theatres and Regal and Cinemark ticketing sites will also be participating. So if you buy your ticket for Aladdin at the box office, for example, sorry, but you can't get verified for that review. (At least for now: Dana Benson, Fandango vice president for communications, says that the site is "exploring options" for ways to verify box office purchases.)
Reviews associated with a ticket purchase will be marked with a "verified" icon. By default, the verified reviews will be used to make up the audience score shown on Rotten Tomatoes. To see the total audience score, including reviews by those who didn't purchase through Fandango or didn't opt in to the verification, users can select the "all audience" tab.
"Every rating counts, but the score that we're putting out there is verified," Ferris said.
The Rotten Tomatoes site will automatically verify that a ticket was purchased and that the time for that movie showing has already passed. For now, only one verified review will be allowed per transaction, no matter how many tickets were purchased.
The changes will affect only movies opening Thursday and beyond, and won't be retroactively applied to movies already on the site. The fan rating system previously used on Fandango's site will be replaced there with the Rotten Tomatoes score.
The change is similar to an element used on Amazon. Reviews written by those who bought a particular product on that site are marked with the words "Verified Purchase."
Fandango will also display Rotten Tomatoes reviews, complete with the "Verified" indicator when a ticket purchase has been confirmed.
Rotten Tomatoes is perhaps best known for the Tomatometer, which tells readers at a glance whether a film has mostly positive or negative reviews from professional critics. But the audience-score section of each movie page is also prominent.
"Our research shows movie fans leverage both (critic and audience ratings)," Ferris said. The changes are meant to "protect the integrity of the audience score," he added.
The audience-score section of the Captain Marvel movie page made the news back in February. Even before the film was released March 8, users were leaving negative comments about it, with some reacting angrily to public comments made by star Brie Larson.
Larson drew fire in part for telling Marie Claire magazine that the critics covering her films were "overwhelmingly white male" and noting that she was reaching out to a more inclusive group of critics. That resulted in some Rotten Tomatoes users leaving such comments as "Larson has made it clear ... men need not attend this movie."
Back in February, Rotten Tomatoes disabled the comment function prior to a movie's release date and made some other changes.
There's clearly a trend toward using a movie-review site to express anger about a film for reasons other than its content. That may not be the only reason for adding and elevating the verified review component, but it's surely in the mix.
"It's a component that we don't ignore," said Lori Pantel, chief marketing officer for Fandango.
Said Benson, "Anyone who is in this space, who has an open platform, is looking at this."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 05-27-2019 02:35 AM
Back in the early days of the web (about 1995 to 1999), I would hold the IMDb rating of a movie in high regards. With a few exceptions, their rating usually closely matched my opinion of a movie.
IMDb was acquired by Amazon somewhere around 1998. Ever since then, I found their ratings to become more divergent from my personal liking.
Obviously, there was an enormous influx on the internet and World Wide Web between back then and now. So you could say that IMDb and those other sites that allow you to review movies, would eventually end up reflecting more of the general opinion of the populace at large, but I doubt that's true anymore. There is so much manipulation going on and there is a big interest at the studios to get those ratings up. Those ratings simply convert into money.
I think that many of those scores are influenced externally. Not just by trolls just voting without even having seen the movie, but simply by bots and hired fake users, to crank up some of those very bad ratings.
If Rotten Tomatoes' new system can beat this kind of abuse, I'm actually all for it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 05-27-2019 07:16 PM
I agree with Bobby completely. Sometimes if you look at the "star rating" for a local business it is very misleading. Both from deliberate "trashing" by trolls and competitors and then from morons.
I've seen many times in the restaurant reviews where people give a restaurant 1 star because they messed up an order even if they fixed it and/or comped the meal. When I look to go to a restaurant, I want to know if the food is good and if it is a clean place. Recently, I almost didn't go to a Chinese restaurant in West Yellowstone (Red Lotus) due to the star rating. Luckily, I read through and found people giving bad reviews for things like, "you can get the same food cheaper in any city." Well, no shit. When a restaurant is in a middle of nowhere tourist destination the food is going to cost more than at home. The McDonald's down the street was like 2x normal prices.
I decided to eat there after determining most of the poor reviews seemed like BS and it was a clean restaurant, with pleasant atmosphere and above average Chinese Food.
Don't even get me started on product reviews on Amazon (and pretty much all websites). You have to develop psychic powers to figure out which reviews are real, which are paid for, which are by trolls and which are by morons (such as giving 1 star because it was damaged in shipping).
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 06-06-2019 02:59 AM
Bobby, reviews on these platforms can also work in the other direction. There is a neighborhood pizza joint just two blocks from my first apartment on Avenue J in Brooklyn -- DeFarras. There was nothing extraordinary about the place; if you know Brooklyn, you know it practically invented great pizza; pizza take-out places in the 80s were as prolific as Starbucks is today, nearly a pizzeria in every neighborhood, with a range from really awful to 5 star. The DeFarra's around the corner from my place made a fair-to-middlin slice, i.e., nothing to write home about and all the kids from the college who lived in my apartment building knew that there were much better pizzerias in Brooklyn (MUCH better), but hey, this was right down the block and since none of us at the time could afford cars, walking trumped quality most of the time.
Thing is, of late, what I can only describe as a hipster cult has grown up around this pizza joint. It had gotten a glowing mention in New Yorker magazine (I think) and from then on, people started to flock to the place like salmon swinging up stream to spawn.
Lots of Brooklyn has become gentrified and so with that comes people aching to be hip and cool and with-it and they seem to have latched on to this pizza place as if the italian gods have come down from Mt Etna and delivered pizza to DeFarra's on Avenue J. AND that popularity allows the old man who runs the place (because he's old, they say he's "authentic") he discovered he can charge $5 a slice (!!) and the hipsters will pay it -- he may be old, but he's no fool, unlike his customers. Because the place is old and decrepit and visibly dirty they say it's "quaint and old-school." Because they make customers wait half and hour to 45min for their burnt slice of pizza, they say he's like the Soup Nazi, so oooh it's like Seinfield -- how freakin hip is THAT?!!
Point is, there are about twenty 5 star reviews from people who have drunk this Kool-Aid to every one who give the place the deserved 1 or 2 star rating -- even 2 stars is to high for a place that failed health inspection MULTIPLE times. Yet if you went by the Yelp reviews, this would be a place to travel miles just to get a taste of what would seems like incredible tasting pizza according to the reviews. Almost to a person these 5 star sheeple claim it's the "best pizza they EVER TASTED." Yah, I guess the rodent droppings are that unique "authentic" ingredient that they just can't get enough of!
Sure Google, Facebook, Amazon and Yelp, et al, can jump thru hoops to try to thwart trolls, but what can you do about the preponderance of imbeciles?
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 06-06-2019 01:16 PM
Yeah, I've personally eaten a lot of pizza in New York City, ranging from bad to great. 30 years ago it just seemed like pot luck, especially if I was buying it by the slice from some shop that doubled as a news stand and convenience store. The chances of getting good pizza were better by visiting an actual restaurant or ordering take out from a pizzeria that did very little else but make pizza.
I agree glowing positive reviews on Yelp or elsewhere can be just as suspect as the extreme negative reviews. Yelp is hurting pretty bad over the situation. Yelp's stock price is well down from a peak set a couple or so years ago. So now they're trying to incorporate other features (booking reservations, ordering thru GrubHub, etc) into their web site and mobile apps so they're not so reliant on user reviews. Anyone can find bogus reviews just as easily on Google and Facebook, so Yelp has to come up with more ways to attract visitors otherwise Yelp is going to be finished soon.
I completely get the concept of some local crowd propping up a restaurant as being great when it's really not that good. When I first moved to Lawton, Oklahoma the locals here went on and on about a local Italian restaurant being great. I wasn't impressed with it at all. I didn't think it even measured up to an average Olive Garden location. Some of my friends thought I was insane. I told them they need to visit some larger cities where there is at least some competition in that food genre, or visit NYC where the competition is fierce. Anyway, that local Italian restaurant went out of business several years ago, not long after an Olive Garden location opened across town.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
quote: Frank Angel
Sure Google, Facebook, Amazon and Yelp, et al, can jump thru hoops to try to thwart trolls, but what can you do about the preponderance of imbeciles?
Ultimately the person reading the reviews has to put more work (and smarts) into it. Think twice about taking the rants and raves at face value. Look for plenty of details that prove the reviewer probably visited the business and see if those specifics are backed up by other reviews.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic