Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | my password | register | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum   » Community   » Film-Yak   » 'Ghost in the Shell': How a Complex Concept, "Whitewashing", Critics Kept Crowds Away

Author Topic: 'Ghost in the Shell': How a Complex Concept, "Whitewashing", Critics Kept Crowds Away
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000

 - posted 04-03-2017 01:27 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From The Hollywood Reporter:


'Ghost in the Shell': How a Complex Concept, "Whitewashing" and Critics Kept Crowds Away

By Gregg Kilday - April 2, 2017

While Paramount tried some innovative marketing to launch the Scarlett Johansson action film, it limped into theaters with a $19 million domestic opening.

Dogged by controversy since the production was first announced, Ghost in the Shell, the futuristic action pic released over the weekend by Paramount, ultimately didn’t create much of a stir at the box office. Its notoriety — both among fans of the original Japanese manga on which it was based and among those who argued an Asian star should have been cast in the central role — may have raised its profile only to make it a more tempting target for demanding critics who appear to have sealed its fate.

Opening in 3,440 locations, the movie, starring Scarlett Johansson as a cyber-warrior determined to discover the truth about her own life, pulled in just $19 million domestically — ranking third on the weekend. It was easily overshadowed by the $49 million debut of Fox/DreamWorks Animation’s The Boss Baby and the third frame of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast, which took in another $47.5 million.

“Ghost in the Shell suffered from tough reviews, an unfamiliarity of North American audiences with the source material, a so-called 'whitewashing' controversy that may have had an effect — though it's almost impossible to quantify that effect empirically — and a very crowded and competitive marketplace that has taken down almost as many films as it has boosted to unprecedented heights,” says Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst for ComScore.

Internationally, where Ghost opened in 53 territories, it did somewhat better. Ranking second on the weekend, the pic collected $40.1 million and was No. 1 in 11 markets, including Hong Kong and Taiwan. The film, directed by Rupert Sanders (handling his first movie since 2012’s Snow White and the Huntsman), is set to open in Japan and China on Friday, and given its performance in Hong Kong, it could make up some ground there. But, produced on a budget of $110 million by Paramount, DreamWorks and Reliance, Ghost now looks as if it will end up in the losing column.

In North America, the audience for the film was dominated by older males — men comprised 61 percent of the opening-weekend crowd, and 76 percent of the audience was over 25. The film played better in cities than rural areas, and it attracted a relatively upscale crowd. Forty-four percent of the audience opted to see the movie in 3D, and Imax theaters accounted for 15 percent of the opening-weekend take. All of which suggests the movie may have captured some of the longtime fanboys, familiar with the manga series by Masamune Shirow, which first appeared in 1989, and the various animated films, TV adaptations and videogames it spawned, but Ghost failed to reach out to a wider audience.

“I think in the end we did an OK job with the fan base, many of them came out,” says Megan Colligan, Paramount president of worldwide distribution and marketing. “But this movie wasn’t allowed to just be a movie.”

The casting controversy that erupted in 2014 set the stage. When Johansson — who’d proven herself an action star in the Avengers movie as well as her solo turn in 2014’s Lucy, which bowed to $43.9 million — was cast, there was an immediate outcry because an Asian or Asian-American actress hadn’t been cast to play a character who was Japanese in the original, even if her identity involves a brain implanted in a cyborg’s body. While groups like the Media Action Network for Asian Americans were among the first to object, others took up the cause: A Care2 petition authored by Julie Rodriguez, calling for the part to be recast, attracted more than 100,000 signatures.

Not everyone objected. Sam Yoshiba, director of the international business division of Kodansha, the manga’s publisher, told The Hollywood Reporter, "Looking at her career so far, I think Scarlett Johansson is well cast. She has the cyberpunk feel. And we never imagined it would be a Japanese actress in the first place." He added, "This is a chance for a Japanese property to be seen around the world." Mamoru Oshii, director of the original 1995 Japanese animated film, also endorsed the choice.

But Guy Aoki, MANAA founding president, responded, “Many in Japan have been so brainwashed by Western culture that they’ve developed an inferiority complex about their own. They assume that in order for an American film to be successful, it has to star a white actor. Tell that to Zhang Yimou, who spent $150 million directing The Great Wall starring Matt Damon only to see it flop worldwide and receive terrible reviews. He’s not going to make his money back.”

As the movie approached its release, Paramount hoped to move beyond the controversy and attract a larger audience for the film. The studio staged a big event in Japan to launch the trailer in November; it booked a Ghost spot during the Super Bowl preshow (watch the ad, above); and it created a stunt where it appeared to hack into the season finale of Mr. Robot by airing five-second ads which approximated the “glitches” that Johansson’s character experiences in the film. Says Colligan, “We did a lot to try to capture a relatively complex idea,” the fact that the main character has both a robotic body and a hacked brain.

While there was no hiding Johansson’s casting, the studio also attempted to convince longtime fans that the movie would be true to the original manga. “I don’t think that group is large, but it’s a rabid, complex audience to deal with,” says Colligan. “With every TV spot, every trailer, you have to be thinking of those fans. But even if you convince them, that’s not enough to open the movie.”

The initial casting controversy never quite died down, though. “What Hollywood needs to understand,” Aoki tells THR, “this is not like when Hollywood announces Michael Keaton is the new Batman or Daniel Craig is the new Bond. There was a big uproar, but the actors were able to turn them around with their approaches to the roles. But you can’t change the ethnicity of an actor, and when a white actor is cast in a role that should have gone to an Asian or Asian-American, it’s not just Asian-Americans who have a vested interest who are upset, but other fair-minded people as well as fans of the original anime. You can’t get away with casting a white actor and think people will eventually warm up. There was a lot of social media talk, after the Super Bowl ad, for example, and a lot of it was negative. People whose first impression was, ‘I love Scarlett Johansson, she kicks ass,’ may have started looking at it and thinking, ‘Maybe I shouldn’t support this.'”

Some recent films, like Marvel’s Doctor Strange, have faced similar white-washing controversies and withstood them, but that would not be the case with Ghost. “We got caught up in the controversy,” says Colligan. “But while there was some percentage of the audience that was affected by the controversy, I don’t think it was a large percentage. But I think it affected the way critics saw the movie.”

And critics weren’t inclined to give the film a free pass. Paramount could tell by the Google searches it was monitoring that in the final week before the film opened, potential moviegoers were checking out reviews before making a decision in higher than usual numbers.

Initially, the film’s Rotten Tomatoes score rose as high as 71 percent positive reviews, based on the first enthusiastic fanboy reactions and critiques from Europe. But as the week progressed and more reviews poured in, the movie’s score began to plummet, eventually falling to 42 percent. Ghost’s tracking, which initially suggested the film might open in the high-$20 million range, maybe even cross over into low-$30 million territory, hit a wall.

“It was very Rotten Tomatoes-sensitive. Lots of people were seeking out information about the film,” says Colligan. “And we got hit pretty hard by the print journalists.”

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 756
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000

 - posted 04-03-2017 03:57 PM      Profile for Dave Bird   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Bird   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hollywood considers over-25 males to be "older men"?

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1567
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006

 - posted 04-03-2017 04:03 PM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting, since 99% of what I do involves press & preview screenings,
and I was scheduled to work one for this movie several weeks ago, but
then it was cancelled, rather suddenly, without any reason given; or at
least no reason was given to me. [and yes- - I still get paid [thumbsup] ]

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2135
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004

 - posted 04-03-2017 07:33 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In my opinion, having Scarlet Johansson in the lead role probably boosted the movie's box office. Without her there is nothing about this movie which is appealing outside of anime fans. What baffles me more than the casting of Johansson is the casting of Michael Pitt. His name is not one that will draw people to the movie, so I seen no point in not casting an "ethnically appropriate" actor.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 2648
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012

 - posted 04-04-2017 01:23 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was marketed pretty well around here. The show I attended last Saturday got booked into a smaller theater, which resulted in a sell out and for now it seems to go pretty strong around here. Compared to that other remake currently in circulation: Power Rangers, for which some shows sell zero tickets.

The movie itself falls short from expectations. The casting of Scarlett Johansson is a controversial one, although her acting certainly isn't bad. I guess they got the look of the movie mostly right, but oversimplified the story to such level, it becomes just a bland, also-ran affair.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10729
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001

 - posted 04-04-2017 12:00 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The 1995 version of Ghost in the Shell is an important movie to anime fans. But that is a niche market. I'm not sure I would expect live action remakes of Akira or Cowboy Beebop to do well either. Fans of the original movies may turn up their noses at a remake that merely seems to be cashing in on the brand. Mainstream audiences usually prefer far more conventional action movie story lines than the ones often found in Japanese animated movies.

I think the critics definitely affected the opening weekend of this live action remake. I was thinking about watching the show in Oklahoma City. The AMC theater at Quail Springs Mall just opened a new Dolby Cinema screen with this movie; I was thinking about seeing how good (or bad) a job they did with the auditorium conversion. When I saw the Rotten Tomatoes score dump 30 points from 70%+ down to 44% along with the negative comments from prominent critics I chose to pass on it. Aggregate scores from Rotten Tomatoes are Metacritic may oversimplify a movie's good or bad qualities. Still, I like the consensus on a movie at least among well established critics to be in "fresh" not "splat" territory if I'm going to spend a good amount of money watching it at the theater.

This is the first I've heard about a Whitewashing controversy with Ghost in the Shell, but the topic has gained a lot of attention lately due to glaring examples in other recent movies. John Oliver's Last Week Tonight on HBO had a pretty hilarious take on Hollywood Whitewashing in its "How is This Still A Thing?" series.

It's easy to see how this remake of Ghost in the Shell could fall into the discussion about Whitewashing. The 1995 movie's main character and most of the principal characters were Japanese. They had Japanese Names, like Major Motoko Kusanagi, which was apparently simplified to "Major" for Scarlett Johansson in the remake.

The movie industry's excuse for Whitewashing is lack of marketable A-list stars in a demographic like Asian-American actors. That problem is rooted in an issue more serious than Whitewashing ethnic characters in remakes of previously released movies. Most Hollywood movie scripts are written with few specifics on gender and ethnicity. This "colorblind" writing allows producers and casting directors to default to casting white actors. Most of the people making the casting decisions are white and male. They're going to cast parts based on their own habits and ingrained perspective.

 |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:

Powered by Infopop Corporation

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2018 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.