Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | my password | register | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum   » Community   » Film-Yak   » NATO's John Fithian: The sky is NOT falling

   
Author Topic: NATO's John Fithian: The sky is NOT falling
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12448
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-20-2017 12:21 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Theater Group President: No, Netflix Isn't Killing the Multiplex (Guest Column)
6:40 AM PST 2/16/2017 by John Fithian

"Three-fourths of (those) interviewed are spending more evenings at home now. Slightly more than half are going to the movies less often, although formerly they were confirmed and in most cases very heavy moviegoers." — U.S. News & World Report

New technology has upended the movie theater industry, disrupting production and distribution; movie theaters are dying.

You'd be forgiven if you thought I was talking about today, the internet and movie streaming services like Netflix and Amazon. The report above actually is from 1955, the disruptive technology was television, and the disruption was real. There were other factors, such as the Paramount Consent Decrees, which forced studios to divest their movie theater properties, but the body blow to theaters that television represented was a complete revolution in the entertainment ecosystem. Theaters no longer held a monopoly on recorded audio-visual entertainment, and box-office revenue hit bottom at $875 million in 1962, down 48 percent from 1946, with admissions off 78.5 percent. The box office would not return to 1946 levels until 1974.

But what about today? Have the internet and movie streaming to the home caused a fresh disruption in the theater industry?

Despite a fairly constant drumbeat of impending doom and decline facing the cinema industry, the reality is otherwise. Since 2004 — following two rather anomalous years that peaked at over 1.5 billion admissions — movie admissions have moved up and down over a fairly narrow range, from 1.27 billion to 1.48 billion annually. Some of that fluctuation is a reflection of the movies in the marketplace, and some is surely because of increased competition from the home market.

But two elements that go hand in hand with increased home competition have been a remarkably weak economy and labor market. Although it often is said that moviegoing is "recession proof," the reality is that, as a low-cost out-of-home option, moviegoing is recession resistant. Yet since 2001, the economy has endured two recessions and periods of growing unemployment. Unemployment rates from the 2002-03 recession had barely returned to previous levels when the credit shock of 2008 sent the economy into a tailspin and brought on unemployment rates above 10 percent. The unemployment rate has only returned to pre-2008 levels in the past year; the median household income has only just returned to what it was in 2000.

And how have theaters fared? Since 2000, domestic theatrical revenue has increased 51 percent — from $7.5 billion to $11.37 billion in 2016. Some analysts will downplay that performance by noting that this has been accomplished through increased pricing rather than admissions growth, but that suggests that theaters have done nothing but raise their prices. Since 2000, the cinema industry has all but reinvented itself: stadium seating with improved sight lines, the overhaul of the industry's basic technology from film to digital projection (purists will argue here for the superiority of film over digital in pristine conditions, but it is inarguable that digital projection has raised the quality of presentation for most moviegoers far above what was possible with film under real-world conditions), digital sound, premium large-format screens, cocktail and food service in the auditorium and the latest widespread innovation ­— luxury power recliners. All those billions of dollars spent on improving the moviegoing experience come with an average ticket price that, adjusted for inflation, is lower than it was in 1976. That $2.13 ticket in 1976 would cost $8.98 in 2016, when the average ticket price was $8.65. The cost-conscious consumer hasn’t been forgotten, either. Movie theaters offer discounts for matinees, students, the elderly and across much of the industry, lower-cost weekdays (typically Tuesdays) have increased weekday attendance.

There certainly has been disruption in the entertainment industry, but it has happened to the movie theater industry's former disrupter — the home entertainment market. The top-rated television program in 2016 had nearly 27 percent fewer viewers than the top-rated program in 2004.

Since 2004 — the peak of home entertainment retail revenue, at $24.9 billion — revenue has dropped 51.6 percent to $12.05 billion. As retail revenue has fallen, the Digital Entertainment Group, which tracks DVD and Blu-ray sales, has taken to including subscription VOD revenue (more akin to premium cable channels like HBO and Showtime) in its annual accounting (adding another $6 billion). How much of that content is episodic television and how much viewers actually watch is not disclosed, and that revenue shouldn't properly be part of the home video equation.

No one disputes that the fare on streaming services is wildly popular and that companies like Netflix have pushed its spending ­— on new episodic content in particular — to astronomic levels, but that spending increasingly is going into a market that is seeing diminishing revenue per transaction.

If the choice is diminishing revenue on increasing viewership versus increasing revenue on fairly stable admissions, I know which one I would take. It is the missing revenue in the home market that drives most of the angst in the entertainment industry.

A weak economy and cheap home entertainment options have eroded theatrical admissions at the margins ­— people watching their pennies and already paying for cable and a video subscription service might take a pass on movies they don't consider "must see" (while sometimes opting for a sure thing; admissions to $100 million-grossing movies have grown from 704 million in 2004 to 750 million in 2016 — up 6.5 percent). But continual investment and a sharp attention to evolving customer demands not only have seen movie theaters through tough times but also have allowed them to thrive. Box office has topped $10 billion domestically for seven straight years, $11 billion for two straight years, and set records in five of the past seven. The entertainment industry might be in the midst of disruption, but it's not happening at the movie theater.

Hollywood Reporter

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8318
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 02-21-2017 04:05 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Goes back to the Great Depression: Which business was still flourishing while others went bust:

The Cinema Industry.

Folks still want to get out of the house and be entertained-to escape the real world of what dwells within.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10703
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 02-21-2017 07:34 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I still think the movie theater industry is moving through uncharted territory.

Despite John Fithian's statements "the sky is not falling" and "Netflix isn't killing the movie business" the NATO President has strongly opposed any day and date release schemes or any other efforts to diminish the theatrical release window. Last September he publicly blasted James Murdock, CEO of 21st Century Fox for calling release windows "crazy."

The theatrical release window has never been shorter than it is today. There is constant pressure from various media executives and movie studio heads to shorten or eliminate the window. If these movie studios keep shrinking the release window it will eventually reach a point of no return. We'll see attendance gradually decrease and then accelerate to a totally destructive pace just like an object getting sucked into a whirlpool.

There may be people who are completely loyal to the movie-going experience regardless of how little time it takes for a first run movie to become available for home viewing. Is there really enough of those kinds of customers to keep movie theaters in business?

The advent of TV in the 1950's and home video rental boom of the 1980's were disruptive to the movie theater business. The movie industry survived both and profited tremendously from the latter. But those are really apples to oranges comparisons to the current situation. Today the movie industry is caught in a cycle of race to the bottom economics. The industry heads took a large home video industry that was very profitable 10 years ago and transformed it into something far less. They want to double down on that strategy with theaters, thinking it will somehow still work.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2018 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.