Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Paramount Wants To Release ‘Justin Bieber Never Say Never’ Director’s Cut ASAP (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Paramount Wants To Release ‘Justin Bieber Never Say Never’ Director’s Cut ASAP
System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 02-16-2011 03:19 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 
Paramount Wants To Release ‘Justin Bieber Never Say Never’ Director’s Cut ASAP

Source: Slashfilm.com

quote:
When the positive reviews of Justin Bieber Never Say Never began to pour in last week, it probably caught most of us by surprise. And when the movie almost took the box office crown from an Adam Sandler romantic comedy, on Valentine’s weekend no less, the 3D documentary pretty much cemented itself as a must-see for anyone who fancies themselves a pop culture guru.

Paramount must also feel the film is creating a unique buzz among moviegoers because they’re going to try something sort of radical to squeeze a few more dollars out of it. They’re pushing director Jon Chu to cut a new version of Never Say Never to release while the movie is still in theaters. However, there’s no guarantee it’s going to happen. Read more about the logistics and specifics after the break.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, Chu is currently in Europe promoting the film in London and Paris but will be back in an editing room by this weekend working on the new cut. Paramount hopes to make a decision on re-releasing the film by early next week so that the director’s cut could be in theaters by the film’s third weekend, February 25.

However, the obstacles to such an elaborate stunt are numerous. First, there’s the actual work, which Chu might not even have the time to do. Second, the film would have to be re-submitted to the ratings board. Then, digital prints – not analog, ’cause that would be way too expensive – would have to be struck to be released in 3D theaters. Insiders tell THR that there’s also the possibility, or even probability, of just holding the new cut for the Blu-ray release.

Even if everything ended up working out, this wouldn’t be the first time a movie was recut while it was in theaters, but it’s certainly a rarity. The football film The Program had a controversial scene removed during its run and the Weinstein are considering re-editing The King’s Speech while it is in theaters to get a PG-13 rating, but that hasn’t happened yet.

Do you remember other instances of this kind of thing happening while a film was still during its first run? Do you think Paramount follows through or do they just wait for the home release?


 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-16-2011 03:56 PM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suppose it doesn't really count but I do rememeber more than one Pixar movie changing during its initial run just to offer all-new "outtakes."

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 02-16-2011 05:20 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Who cut the first version?

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-16-2011 06:32 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bieber.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-16-2011 07:08 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It actually happened quite a bit during the roadshow era. And even after the roadshow era ended, there were several films that got cut after the first runs had opeend it. The Shining lost its final scene after its first weekend in L.A. and N.Y. (Barry Nelson's character visited Shelley Dubvall's character in the hospital after all the previous going-ons. Kubrick felt it was anti-climatic. (As a matter of fact, some of the general rerlease prints carried a physical print cut with visible splice at the point right before the credits). Also, EXORCIST II: THE HERETIC lost its ending after its first week of release (wide for the era, alleledly due to audience hilarity. Again, cuts were made at the theatre level by the projectionist.

Even the original THE EXORCIST had a slight revision in prints the month after its release. On shot was changed for clairity and a screen credit given to Linda Blair's "possessed" vvoice, Mercedes McCambridge. Of course, THE EXORCIST was still in limited release at that point, with probably no more than 30-50 prints showing at that point, if that.

In the ratings system history, if any cuts or changes to a fiolm would trigger a ratings change, the film had to be withdrawn for circlulation for something like 60 days before the newly rated edition woukld appear.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 02-16-2011 08:53 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John: [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 02-16-2011 10:13 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Empire Strikes Back... Four weeks into release, three new shots and an extra ADR line of dialogue were added to the final scene. As well, some transitional "wipes" were revised, one shot in Reel 1 was replaced, and at least one VFX shot was re-composited.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-22-2011 07:11 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The football film The Program had a controversial scene removed during its run
Anyone know what was that all about?

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 02-22-2011 07:59 AM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
The original release of the film contained a scene where several ESU players lay on the yellow dividing line of a busy local road as a test of their courage. When two young men were killed, and several others injured, by imitating the stunt, Buena Vista excised the scene from the film. No post-theatrical versions of the movie feature the sequence, leading many to speculate that the studio destroyed the actual camera negatives scene.
From IMDb trivia for The Program

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 02-26-2011 05:00 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yet a few seconds of that scene were in the trailer.

When it played where I worked, I saw some drunk kids go out and lay in the middle of the street in front of the theater, but this was after midnight on a 25-mph street with nobody around.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-26-2011 06:32 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Interestingly the Bieber 2.0 cut is 10 minutes longer, yet the advertising claims "includes 40 minutes of new Bieber footage".

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 02-26-2011 09:17 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brad Miller
Interestingly the Bieber 2.0 cut is 10 minutes longer, yet the advertising claims "includes 40 minutes of new Bieber footage".
40 - 30 = 10.
[Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-26-2011 11:14 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They have removed 30 minutes of footage from Version 1, and replaced it with 40 minutes of new footage.

I'm glad of this, actually. We're going to play it next week, and lots of our teenage girls have gone to Billings to see it, so we'll be able to promote the "new 40 minutes" angle.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-27-2011 12:41 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Well Mike, it also says "for one week only".

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 02-27-2011 01:44 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So did the Miley Cyrus 3D event a while back, even if they gave out security keys were initially set for 2 weeks. It's one week only, if and only if they decide to keep it that way.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.