Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » 3D technology war

   
Author Topic: 3D technology war
System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 04-01-2011 08:28 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 
3D technology war

Source: varitey.com

quote:
In the world of 3D exhibition, the companies that make the glasses and add-ons systems used by theaters to screen films in 3D are knocking heads over screens in this country and worldwide.
Though RealD got to the party early and locked in some impressive contracts, a group of tough challengers -- some among the biggest names in entertainment tech -- is developing their own set of relationships and strongholds.

The three largest players in the 3D exhibition market are still RealD, Dolby and Xpand. RealD is the undisputed frontrunner, with greater than 85% market share in the U.S. Company recently announced it had passed 15,000 installed screens worldwide.

Started in 2003 by CEO Michael Lewis, RealD adds complex technology to a d-cinema projector but requires only simple polarized glasses, which can be disposable. RealD also uses a unique business model. Instead of selling its systems outright, it collects a royalty on each ticket. Exhibs have liked that because they're not on the hook for an expensive add-on should the format -- or RealD itself -- go belly-up. RealD has aggressively pursued long-term deals with major theater chains to lock in market share.

The company has approximately 8,600 screens in the U.S. and Canada at about 2,300 locations. There are around 6,500 international RealD-enabled screens at 2,150 locations outside the U.S. These numbers translate to a 182% increase in their base of installed theatres in the last 12 months alone.

Dolby, a much older company with a proud brand and deep relationships with exhibitors, entered the 3D market later with a (color-based) interference filter system that requires more expensive, reusable glasses, but the glasses are still "passive" -- they have no electronics built in. Dolby doesn't sell to theater chains but to aggregators who put together d-cinema systems for theaters.

X factor

Xpand has built a reputation for their high performance active shutter 3D glasses ($35 a pair, reusable) and in the process won 3,500 screens in total, many in Asia and Europe. Because the Xpand glasses have electronics built into the frames, it requires somewhat less tech in the projector -- or in the TV, as Xpand makes universal glasses for today's active-shutter 3D TVs. Company also just introduced a 3D plug-in for PowerPoint.

"It's true that it might be cheaper to see a 3D with passive glasses but I don't think audiences are stupid," said Xpand's chief strategy officer, Ami Dror. "They can tell the difference between good 3D and bad 3D. When it's bad, people get headaches or it just doesn't look as good. Our system looks good and it costs more. That's the choice exhibitors have to make."

All three companies claim to have superior tech, though, and in fact all are rated high by experts. RealD is arguably the most vulnerable to cross-talk (a double image when the left eye and right eye frames aren't fully separated), but the difference is small.

Trailing the big three are upstart Masterimage, which uses tech similar to RealD and has sold systems to more than a dozen mid-sized theater chains; Panavision, which uses a "spectral comb" filter that's a cousin to Dolby and is starting a push in the Americas; Technicolor, which is focused mainly on helping film projectors show 3D; and startup Oculus, which has another 35mm-based 3D system but for now is focused on making eco-friendly polarized glasses.

"We have relationships with all these exhibitors for a reason," said RealD's Lewis. "If our product didn't give a great experience at a price that works for the exhibitors, we wouldn't be there." But nowadays the 3D companies aren't really competing on the quality of their technology but rather on economics. And that may give RealD's competitors an opening.

Though Lewis won't discuss details of RealD's exhib deals, its standard deal charges a royalty on each ticket sold for a RealD showing plus fees for the system itself over the course of the time it's used by the theater. Exhibs pay the royalty and fees as they go but are spared having to buy the system.

Specs and bucks

At the heart of the competition is 3D glasses, and here RealD has a major advantage. In North America, distributors supply RealD disposable glasses to theaters, so RealD's glasses are cost-free to exhibs. Distribs don't subsidize reusable glasses. Outside the U.S., RealD sells the glasses to the theater, which then resells them to patrons for a cost of approximately €1, Lewis said. Patrons are encouraged to carry their own and avoid the extra charge when they return.

Cleaning, loss, breakage and theft are significant expenses with reusables, but even with those costs reusables are arguably cheaper over their life. However, since exhibs don't bear the cost of disposables, RealD's competitors lose that advantage.

RealD's rivals also claim to offer a better deal since they don't force a theater chain to sign a multiyear deal or pay a per-ticket royalty. Masterimage's pitch has convinced more than a dozen mid-range theater chains, including Bow Tie Cinemas, to buy their 3D systems. The company's glasses are also subsidized in the U.S. Outside the U.S., the glasses are sold to the theater and then resold to patrons as well. Masterimage prexy Peter Koplik believes his glasses are less expensive than RealD's.

All companies offering 3D systems with polarized glasses have to worry about cross-talk. The big advantage of the Xpand shutter glasses is that there is no cross-talk; only one eye sees the screen at a time. That earns them plaudits among some 3D experts, though the glasses are relatively heavy, can fail and need recharging.

Lewis doesn't believe RealD's glasses are outperformed or that Xpand's business model will work over the long haul.

"The best way to do 3D has been established," Lewis said.

Panavision entered the 3D market only in October. "We know we're coming into this late," said Eric Rodli, general manager of 3D systems for Panavision. "When you're late to a party, you have to bring a really good dessert, and that's what we think we've done." Panavision has just over 50 screens between the U.S. and South America. Rodli believes its biggest areas of opportunity for now will be outside the U.S.

Technicolor has designed low-cost systems designed to upgrade film projectors to 3D -- an opportunity even Technicolor thinks is only going to last a few years. Their pitch is to theaters and chains that lack resources for a digital upgrade. With the Technicolor system, they can show 3D (and collect the 3D upcharge) with a 35mm projector. Technicolor uses polarized glasses modeled on RealD's design but specially designed by Technicolor.

These smaller companies clearly have no intention of giving up the fight despite the considerable advantages RealD brings to the battle. They hope that the d-cinema wave is big enough for a bunch of companies to surf, and they may be right.

The studios want to push the digital transition and lose the expense of release prints. And while auds seem indifferent to the quality advantages of d-cinema, they've flocked to 3D, even at an upcharge, so it's become the biggest inducement for theaters to go digital.

As Koplik puts it: "RealD is Goliath and we're David, but we're getting better with our slingshot."

Contact the variety newsroom at news@variety.com


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-01-2011 08:46 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
LOL people still wear glasses to view 3D? How prehistoric.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-01-2011 11:08 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well we saw demos of about 47 different 3D systems and/or types of glasses during CinemaCon. Most of them were in the big Colisseum theatre, but one (film based, not Technicolor) was in a small room, one was in the trade show and one (XPand) was in a big banquet hall during lunch.

The film-based system, I think it was called Sirius 1, was a freaking joke. When we walked in, this lady said "These are the best 3D glasses on the planet" and we settled in to be dazzled. They were using beat-up, scratched film of old trailers (stuff from last summer) for content, on about a 12 foot screen. The 3D itself looked "off" for some reason. There was no masking and the image was smaller than the screen, and there were weird edge effects. I couldn't put my finger on it exactly but it just didn't look "right." The middle of the frame would be OK but out near the edges, it was like constantly trying to resolve two images at the same time. We watched for about 10 minutes and I could already feel a headache beginning to form.

The XPand system was shown during the final day lunch. It got a raw deal presentationwise: There were three screens, a big one in the middle and two smaller ones on each side. The screen closest to me was one of the smaller ones, about 20 feet in size, but from real far away, so it seemed like a big TV set. They also did not turn off the lights in the room completely -- only dimmed them about halfway. And on top of that, they used a movie with dark images (Thor) for the demo. So it looked like crap too, even though I could tell the 3D would have been pretty good in the proper surroundings. However the Xpand glasses are heavy and clunky.

We also saw a Panavision demo at the GDC booth. This one suffered too, due to the small image (about 60 inches or so), bright area lights (it was in the trade show) and dark source material (the latest Pirates trailer). Again though, I could tell that the 3D and the brightness would have been excellent if the picture was bigger and the lights off. Also this system has the goofiest looking, bulkiest glasses I've ever seen, but they would sure keep the extra light out.

The other demos we saw were in the Colisseum on the 70-foot screen. The image on the 70' screen was great in all the presentations.

After seeing all the demos I am convinced that, other than the film-based system I mentioned above, they all look good if there is enough light. Exhibitors who cheap-out on a smaller bulb are going to kick themselves.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-02-2011 09:20 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Isn't 3D dead yet? It sure died here last Summer. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-02-2011 12:26 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If Lord of The Dance: 3D didn't put a bullet in its head, I don't know what will. The weeklong grosses at the local multiplexes were less than a single show of our movie (which totally bombed). I don't think I've ever seen grosses that low.

Did it die that badly everywhere?

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 04-02-2011 05:04 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Someone needs to tell the upper-managment-moron types at those companies that 3D is dead, and stop wasting money on it.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-02-2011 08:11 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Or just get them to start selling these:
http://www.thinkgeek.com/interests/looflirpa/e8be/?cpg=156H&link
quote:
The De-3D glasses eliminate the 3D effect from 3D movies, allowing you to watch in the comfort of 2D.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 04-03-2011 09:48 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ah-ha! A violation of my recent patent!. I charge $4.00 to REMOVE the annoying 3D from ANY large chain 3D process! louis

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 04-03-2011 03:35 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
3-D doesn't die it just hibernates. I thought everyone knew that??? [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.