my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Making RG-6 Cables (BNC)

Author Topic: Making RG-6 Cables (BNC) Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-17-2012 07:15 AM                     Would anyone care to share their experiences (pros and cons) working with compression versus crimp connectors?  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-17-2012 08:44 AM                     Without a doubt, conventional crimps have proven to be more reliable than compression and we have definitely tried both. A key to ANY crimp is to ensure that you have the proper crimps and crimper for the cable you are working with. Merely having RG6 in the spec is not sufficient! We have had to remake cables that "others" installed using compression crimps where the cables fell out of the connectors. We then noted that the installer, despite using the same brand cable for both cables (different colors)...the OD of the cables were not the same. I have found that cheap cables and crimps just bite one in the butt, eventually. The only compression crimps that have been sufficiently reliable for us have been the RCA and "F" connector variety. For BNCs though...stick with the conventional crimp! Note, there is more to a crimp that just the connector and crimper...the cable MUST be prepared correctly too.  |  IP: Logged Richard Hamilton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1341 From: Evansville, Indiana Registered: Jan 2000 posted 02-17-2012 08:46 AM                     Manny, I've only made a few cables and they were on-site. I had to buy a stripper (not the naked kind, for the coax) and screw on the connectors. Wow, I said stripper and screw in a sentence twice now. I didn't want to pay the $50 for a set of dies for my crimper. I can't give any advice because my limited experience. What I can say is, I never had any problems with those racks. (he he, I got "racks" in there too) Rick  |  IP: Logged Mark Ogden Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 943 From: Little Falls, N.J. Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-17-2012 10:40 AM                     If you are just going to put the connector on the cable and install it on a piece of terminal equipment or an output of a VTR or somesuch thing in a low traffic area, and then just leave it, then possibly you could get away with a compression/screw on type connector with appropriate strain relief. If you are going to be making and breaking the connection after it is installed, or it is going to be in an area with any physical traffic at all, you are much better off going with a crimp connector. Compression connectors suffer from very low pull strength ratings, 75 - 90 lbs typically, which amounts to little more than a footfall from your average Teamster. Crimp connectors are stronger PROVIDED that the cable was stripped to spec, paying special attention to the height of the center conductor and the amount of the outer jacket left for the sleeve to grab onto. If you see yourself making a bunch of these, a good investment is a Kings or Belden or Canare stripper with the correct blade block for the cable you are using.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-17-2012 10:09 PM                     Thanks for all the comments. To clarify - these cables will be for temporary duty applications - they'll have to be durable. I'm already convinced to go with the crimp-type.  |  IP: Logged Bruce Hansen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 847 From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-19-2012 07:06 PM                     Crimp ons are best. Compression connectors are not very good, screw ons are bad. I don't think you can even get a screw on in 75 ohm.  |  IP: Logged David Buckley Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 525 From: Oxford, N. Canterbury, New Zealand Registered: Aug 2004 posted 02-19-2012 07:35 PM                        quote: Steve Guttag you have the proper crimps and crimper for the cable There's no overstating how important that fact is. The wrong match leads to an unreliable connection. Do this lark for a few years and you end up with a boxload of crimping tools. Trouble is, they all look pretty much the same, so my contribution is when you buy your first expensive crimping tool, get a cheap engraving tool at the same time, and engrave onto the crimper exactly what cable and crimps it fits. Wish I'd thought of that when I started out...  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-19-2012 10:44 PM                     We have a separate "kit" for each type of cable we support. For instance, our "RG-6" kit is only for Beldend 1694A and 1695A cable...that is it...the kit has the crimper and crimps. Likewise, we have a WPW818 kit and on down the line...it limits what cable we use. If we are going to support another cable...it has to bring something to the mix because we are going to have to get another crimper/dies and crimps to support it. That can get to be expensive!  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-20-2012 01:03 AM                     Yes, I plan to stick with the cable stocks used in our system. I've noted the stock and tracked down the appropriate crimps. The matching crimp tools and dies I've seen aren't cheap, so it gave me reason for pause. But I think I've been sufficiently reassured to go with crimping the connectors -- thanks to all of your comments.  |  IP: Logged Bruce Hansen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 847 From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-21-2012 08:06 PM                     BTW, 1694A (RG-6) is big, heavy, and stiff. That makes it hard to work with. 1694A does not give you much of an advanage over 1505A, and 1505A is easier to work with. For short runs 1855A is smaller, and lighter. When working on a rack of DAs or patch pannels, if you use 1694A you will not be able to get to the back of the equipment, the rack will be so packed with cable. Beldon says that HD SDI, at 1.5G will go 200 feet down 1855A.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-21-2012 09:19 PM                     For a picture of a rack of patch bays wired with 1695A (plenum version of 1694A)...in the picture warehouse of this forum (AFI/Silver) http://www.film-tech.com/warehouse/pics/afi/AFISPicture82.jpg It is servicable but as Bruce says...it is big heavy stuff and one has to know how to dress it. A lot of people use 1505A. If were in the broadcast market, we would definitely work with smaller options...however, for what we do and in the DCinema industry, 1694A works well and since it is normally just a pair of cables...it is actually easy to work with because it is stiff/heavy. Easy to strip, easy to crimp...works every time.  |  IP: Logged Manny Knowles "What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???" Posts: 4247 From: Bloomington, IN, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 02-21-2012 11:02 PM                     I've got quite a bit of Gepco VSD2001 in various colors.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.