Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » "Classic" movies you hate...and why (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
Author Topic: "Classic" movies you hate...and why
Joe Tommassello
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 547
From: Coatesville, PA, USA
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 07-01-2010 02:50 PM      Profile for Joe Tommassello   Email Joe Tommassello       Edit/Delete Post 
Let's turn that other thread upside down. Occasionally I sit down to watch a classic film that I haven't seen before and am at a loss to see why it has such a reputation. Sometimes I think they are crap. I'll start with:

Fellini's 8 1/2

Seemed like just a lot of self-absorbed vignettes. The musical "Nine" wasn't much better.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-01-2010 03:03 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
2001: A Space Odyssey is the first thing that comes to my mind. Most old people jack off to this movie and have instantaneous orgasms when talking about how great it is, but not me. Old people will accuse me of having ADD because I do not appreciate the fact that this movie has next to no editing at times. Just loooooong sustained shots of nothing happening. Maybe if I were an old fart who liked to sit on his front porch and wait for someone to walk by and consider that a day well spent, something like that might keep my interest. I will admit that I enjoyed the middle part of the movie with the dude from Star Trek and the other dude on the space ship along with HAL. That was cool. But everything before that and everything after is just a waste of time. I think people take psychedelic mind-altering drugs when watching this, as it is usually the old hippies from the 60's and 70's who love this shit. I do not need 20 minutes of flying over a false color mountain, only to be interrupted with a close-up of some asshole's eyeball. I also don't need 30 minutes of apes in the beginning with a very poor edit of a tossed bone/spaceship (the bone isn't even at the same angle as the ship, what a shitty cut. You can remove the actual edit from the print by several frames on both sides and it will have no effect on the supposed "impact" of the edit). I know most of you will shed many tears over my review of the movie here, but that's the way it is. Your beloved 2001 sucks. I love most other Kubrik movies, but I have not seen Clockwork Orange because it has a guy on the cover and he is wearing a silly little hat. On the back it said something about tap dancing. I do not like hats or tap dancing so I will not watch this movie.

I'll try to think of more movies later.

 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 07-01-2010 03:09 PM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
+1

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Tommassello
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 547
From: Coatesville, PA, USA
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 07-01-2010 03:46 PM      Profile for Joe Tommassello   Email Joe Tommassello       Edit/Delete Post 
I was going to save this one for later but I can't wait...for the new one you guys are going to ream for me, I mean!

Lawrence of Arabia

This was available in HD on demand a couple of years ago and I was excited as I had never seen it. Three times I started watching it and three times I had to turn it off before I shot myself in the head out of boredom...usually after about 30 minutes. Does this movie get good? I haven't been so bored watching a movie since my next entry:

Chariots of Fire

What a piece of garbage that was. Can you believe that techno-garbage noise won the Oscar for best musical score? I don't remember why I even tried to watch it...I think is was showing in a double feature with a real movie!

 |  IP: Logged

Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 07-01-2010 04:13 PM      Profile for Hillary Charles   Email Hillary Charles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Chariots of Fire

What a piece of garbage that was. Can you believe that techno-garbage noise won the Oscar for best musical score? I don't remember why I even tried to watch it...I think is was showing in a double feature with a real movie!

The (mostly piano) Vangelis music doesn't bother me as much as the fact that the movie won an Oscar for...BEST COSTUMES! [Confused] The only costumes were gym shorts and t-shirts, and period costumes which were merely rented [Mad]

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 07-01-2010 04:20 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Wizard of Oz.

...because when my brother and I were younger (much) WE wanted to see Bambi, but my sister, SHE wanted to watch The Wizard of Oz and she won the straw poll.....AND she spent half the movie under the seat scared because of the green witch.

Oz sucks.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 07-01-2010 04:35 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Tommassello
Lawrence of Arabia
I'll have to go for another David Lean film, 'Brief Encounter'. I like most of his films, but this one is just so boring. If you go to Carnforth Station, where the location scenes were filmed, they actually play it continuously in the refreshment room, so you can watch it all day long if you want to. Carnforth is pretty much in the middle of nowhere, so very few people get off the train there except for fans of the film who run up and down the subway (the sort you walk through, not the sort that trains run through) ramp, look at the clock, and have a cup of tea in the refreshment room (I'm not even sure if it's the original one, or a reconstruction).

I've never really liked 'Citizen Kane' either.

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 07-01-2010 04:41 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thunder Road, starring Robert Mitchum, has left me cold. This was a popular movie out here when it was released in the 50s, and maybe it's something to do with the period, or with the moonshine running, but I find little to like about it.
The 2 things that stand out is the casting of Robert Mitchum's son as his brother and Mitchum's smashing of the bad guy's hat.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-01-2010 06:30 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have never seen 2001 but based on everything I've heard and read about it over the years, I think I would agree with Joe on it.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard P. May
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 243
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jan 2006


 - posted 07-01-2010 07:09 PM      Profile for Richard P. May   Email Richard P. May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Re: Chariots of Fire...
In addition to the Oscars mentioned above, it also won Best Picture and Writing.
I haven't seen it for a long time, so won't give an opinion.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-01-2010 08:10 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never been a big Lawrence of Arabia fan though I think it is technically beautiful.

I was never an ET fan either.

But "The Last Picture Show" is one I definitely don't "get." It is supposed to be great but not for me.

-Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-01-2010 09:48 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
2001 - Joe's review is spot on. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Lawrence of Arabia - Again, boring but as Steve says, "technically beautiful". This just goes to show you that a movie that looks pretty isn't necessarily entertaining.

Avatar - Maybe this isn't old enough to be called a "classic", but it was the biggest movie of all time, and yet we have another Lawrence lesson...a movie that looks pretty isn't necessarily entertaining. James Cameron, one of my favorite directors, you have failed me.

A Clockwork Orange - Just retarded. I could only make it 30-45 minutes into this not-funny-at-all gargantuan turd. I'm pretty sure you have to be a brain dead pothead to get the humor in this.

Gandhi - Couldn't make it very far into this one either.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-01-2010 11:11 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Amadeus. Ghandi. I don't "get" Slumdog Millionaire either.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 07-02-2010 12:04 AM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
GONE WITH THE WIND is not extraordinarily terrible, but it is extraordinarily over-rated. Thankfully, I've only seen it once. But I remember spending the whole nine hours thinking about how the main character is not even remotely likable. Not the worst movie, but certainly the most highly-regarded bad movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-02-2010 12:11 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked Amadeus but it has been a long time since I have seen it. It was perhaps a little bit long for its own good, thinking back.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.