Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Overlays on TV sports events -- How?

   
Author Topic: Overlays on TV sports events -- How?
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-09-2008 04:14 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anyone know just how they superimpose graphic on top of, or better still underneath the image in sports broadcasts -- like the down line on the football field. It moves with the shot and objects can cover it (players cross it and it their image blocks it); it really looks like it is on the field.

They used it in the Olympics and I've seen it in other such events like bike racing where they have actually company logos looking like they are painted on the road....until they fade out and are replaced by another one. Great effects, but HOW?

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 10-09-2008 04:21 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Apparently it takes 8 computers and a lot of 3D modeling etc. to superimpose the first-down line in a televised football game.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-09-2008 04:48 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That site said:

quote:
Given that the camera can pan while viewing the field, the system has to be able to recalculate the perspective at a rate of 30 frames per second as the camera moves.
Wrong. It's 60fps.

Also, the video is buffered a second or two so it doesn't have to do it in real time.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Minichino
Master Film Handler

Posts: 350
From: Haskell, NJ, USA
Registered: Dec 2005


 - posted 10-09-2008 05:20 PM      Profile for Robert Minichino   Author's Homepage   Email Robert Minichino   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, 60 frames or fields, either way. But even if the video is buffered it still has to do it in real-time or it would have to start dropping frames as it backed up.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-09-2008 05:50 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I should have said it doesn't need to do it "live". In fact that would be impossible. It has to take the frame from the camera and then determine WTF is going on and then it has to paint the useless line over it which nobody cares about and then it has to send it out. It increases lag. So when you're gasping your chest on that heartwrenching play, the people at the stadium already know how it ended.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-09-2008 06:25 PM      Profile for Mark Ogden   Email Mark Ogden   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The CBS Sports package is supplied by Princeton Video, who first developed the technology. Here's a quick explanation.

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-09-2008 08:42 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, it is real time. These things are used LIVE on the air, and intercut with cameras that do not have the supered line. There is a unit that attaches to the camera and the tripod. It measures the movement of the camera. It also hooks into the lens controls so that it knows where the zoom and focus are. Before the game the camera is pointed to certain points on the field, and the "line" opperator inputs those points into the computer. The system then can super a graph of the yard lines, and the opperator can tweek anything that is off. A sort of croma key (or matt) is used to have the line show up on the GREEN grass, but not on the players. Want to see the keying system have a hard time? Watch when the sun is setting, and there are shadows on the field. Not only is there a difference in the amount of light, and therefore a difference in the intensity of the colors, but the shadows are more blue, then the area in the sun.

Depending on the importance of the game (more viewers = more money from commercials) there can be between 0 and 4 cameras equipped with these things.

Last week I worked on the East Lake golf tournament for NBC (and the Golf Channel), and there is now a version of this "line" system for golf.

Any graphics, such as the score are keyed over the image in the production switcher, and have nothing to do with the "line" system. These come from a character generator. This unit outputs the graphics video, it also outputs a "hole cut" signal, to tell the switcher where the graphics are, so that they can be keyed into the selected video.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-10-2008 01:10 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bruce Hansen
there is now a version of this "line" system for golf.
What the hell for?

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-10-2008 01:25 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
People who do broadcast sports figure that people actually want shit superimposed all over the place. But for golf it is probably yard markers since just telling the audience how far the ball traveled is simply not good enough.

Ever notice that the announcers always ignore the line? You will see a dude with a football cross a line and get tackled just on the other side. It clearly looks like a first down if the line were accurate. The announcers say stuff like "that may be a first down" and then they actually measure even though you can clearly see the ball on the other side of the line. hen they rule that it was NOT a first down.

Line=fail.

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Potts
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 159
From: Anderson, SC, USA
Registered: Sep 2008


 - posted 10-10-2008 01:59 AM      Profile for Tyler Potts   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm just glad I don't see that freakin' glowing puck the NHL tried to do in the early '90s. It was constantly a foot behind the puck, and for someone who grew up in Buffalo, I know how to follow hockey.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-10-2008 02:47 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Seems like an AWFUL lot of technology and $$$ just to put something in the picture that no one give a hoot about. Ads, as obnoxious as they are, at least you can understand that they make money; the line makes nothing.

Just like the color announcer. Years ago they did an experiment -- I think it was on Fox -- just using the field announcer as the play-by-play (sparse that it is) on the broadcast audio -- no color, no other play-by-play -- same thing the stadium audience hears. If it's good enough for them, it should be good enough for the TV audience. Hell, the tv audience can see much more that the stadium audience -- why do they need enhanced play-by-play, plus the incessant, usually innane yammering of the color guy. I LOVED it, but it was very short lived -- only two games. Then it was back to business as usual....a barrage of 90% useless, ego maniacal, look-world-I-can-talk-without-stopping-for-two-hours bullsheet.

Yah, the line is very interesting in its execution and no doubt clever, but bottom line....it's useless. All costly glitz and no substance.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-10-2008 04:07 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What's nice about many sports games broadcast in Dolby Digital™ 5.1 audio is that you can unplug the terminals for the center speaker and it is almost like being at the stadium. You don't hear any announcers, just crowd cheers and whatnot. Since it is discrete, there's no crosstalk like there would be if you tried this with a Pro-Logic signal.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-10-2008 08:14 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With ATSC, it should be possible to broadcast the game without the "additional material" (lines, etc.) on a subchannel. If there is an ATSC equivalent to the SAP channel, they could even have a non-announced version of the game. Is anyone doing this? Probably not.

Personally, I object to the fake stadium ads that often show up in televised baseball games (and maybe other sports, too). These are meant to look like billboards at the ballpark, but are actually inserted into the broadcast picture even though they don't exist in real life (and don't show up at all in instant replays). At least with football, the yellow line (which I don't really like either) looks fake and is obviously not on the field. It seems to be boarderline deceptive to add in fake advertisements that are intended to look real. Why not just sell advertising space on the players' uniforms and be done with it? Also, the shots with the fake ads seem to be delayed by a frame or two, as there is usually a noticeable gap when cuts are made to and from those shots.

The technology is clever and interesting, but I don't see how any of this would increase viewership. I watch very little television, but would watch more if the networks would get rid of on-screen logos and fix the incessant lip-sync issues that every station seems to have to some extent. Bad sound sync would not have been acceptable in 1960, so I see no reason why it should be acceptable now.

Complaints aside, current HD sports broadcasts look amazing (usually). It's amazing how much picture quality has improved in the last decade. Too bad almost everything else about television is worse than it was in the 1990s.

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 10-10-2008 08:33 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
So when you're gasping your chest on that heartwrenching play, the people at the stadium already know how it ended.
This is why I like going to sporting events. When I watch on TV I know in the back of my brain that what I'm watching happened several seconds ago. You've got processing delay in the truck, delay from truck to satellite, satellite to network control, network control back to satellite, satellite to distributor, distributor repackaging of data, distributor to satellite or cable system and then satellite or cable system to your house.

Plus, if they are still using it there is the Janet Jackson live delay.

In some cases, the delay can be 10 seconds or more for a "Live" event.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-10-2008 10:47 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Norwood
Also, the shots with the fake ads seem to be delayed by a frame or two
Yes, they "wobble" or float when the camera is not perfectly still. It probably wouldn't work at all if Paul Greengrass was holding the camera. Realtime, my ass!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.