Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Screenwriting Software

   
Author Topic: Screenwriting Software
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-10-2007 01:08 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm looking for some feedback about three different screen writing software programs: Final Draft, Movie Magic Screenwriter and Sophocles.

My father writes novels for a living, but is currently in the early stages of a developing a comedy with a friend of his who directs a lot of TV series episodes and commercials. He asked me what I thought would be good and I just told him, "hell, I don't know." Final Draft is all I'd ever heard of screenwriters using, and then they typically submit printed scripts instead of anything like electronic files. The couple scripts I wrote in art school I just hammered out in Word Perfect.

Anyway, I figured there would probably be at least a few members in this forum who have tried one or all of these products. Sophocles seems like it might be pretty good to use for all the features it contains and the different angle it has on the story development process. It also costs a heck of a lot less than Final Draft.

Opinions?

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-10-2007 02:46 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MicroSoft Word or any text editing program is fine. I've used Final Draft and it did not entertain me. It is easier to write shit in applications that work in a straightforward manner like Word and other crap like that. If you are pretentious you may want to look into Final Draft or something similar. If most screenwriters tend to use Final Draft, then I'd recommend staying FAR away from that program as it just might have a bug which makes any scripts written in it suck.

I hope your dad is not Tom Clancy. He's boring.

 |  IP: Logged

Jennifer Pan
THE JEN!

Posts: 1219
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 06-10-2007 03:37 PM      Profile for Jennifer Pan   Author's Homepage   Email Jennifer Pan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
http://www.scriptbuddy.com/

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-10-2007 03:47 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
He's not Tom Clancy. Although Tom Clancy has read my father's books. I just wish my father has sold as many books as Clancy.

I would agree that standard word processors like MS Word and Word Perfect are fine for screen writing -as long as you truly understand all the formatting rules.

I've looked at Final Draft before and don't like its interface. It's just really clunky looking. I understand it's like the "industry standard" for screen writers. That reminds me of what used to be the situation in page layout software. Quark Xpress has been the most widely used program for composing newspapers and magazines for many years. Quark is expensive and I think it is pretty freaking clunky. In recent years Adobe has really been hammering Quark very hard with Adobe InDesign. The new CS3 upgrade is a pretty important update.

Sophocles looks pretty interesting. It has a better looking and more straight forward interface. The program's reporting features seem pretty cool. You can sort scenes by location, track which characters have higher percentages of dialog and all sorts of other stuff. The word processing programs won't do much of that. For $120 it doesn't seem bad. And there's a demo you can try before buying the full version.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-10-2007 06:24 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Screw formatting. The following is fine for me:

Billy and Max are having a casual conversation when suddenly Max gets up to leave.

Billy: Where are you going, Max?

Max: Why I'm off to have hardcore sex with a girl I met this morning. She has a friend. Wanna come along?

Billy: But I'm all out of condoms!

Max: Condoms are for losers! Besides, we won't tell them our real names if something happens anyway.

Billy: Gee I dunno, Max. I think I'll stay at home and study.

Max: Geeez! I can't believe you! Have fun with your books you stupid little nerd!

Max leaves. Billy was right about the condoms. The very next day Max died from fatal Herpes.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 06-10-2007 09:38 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Every story is supposed to have three things: a beginning, a middle and an end. Max found out about the poisonous back end.

I agree the formatting rules seem pretentious and stupid. The worse problem is not everyone working in a production company developing a screenplay has an adequate number of brain cells. They might not understand seeing something different yet just as easy to read. I don't know. I guess it's just a fashion thing, or tradition or maybe an O.C.D. thing. Thank God movie producers and such have had no influence on how magazines and other print publishing should be formatted.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.