Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Massachusetts screening of LOTR 3

   
Author Topic: Massachusetts screening of LOTR 3
Patrick McDonough
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 118
From: Greenfield Ma.
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 11-22-2003 04:36 PM      Profile for Patrick McDonough   Email Patrick McDonough   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Anyone going to this in randolph, Ma. Or anyone work at the theater Where it is going to be screened.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-23-2003 12:36 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Much to my dissapointment, they are not doing a LOTR3 screening in the Bay Area. When a theatre owner called Searchlight, he was told that California isn't a blind booking state, so they don't have too play it up here.

I thought briefly of traveling to LA or Portland to watch it, then I thought, I would just see it when it comes out.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 11-23-2003 01:16 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why does that not make sense. I thought when your state was a blind booking state it did not have to run a screening. Our state is a non-blind booking state and they have to provide screenings for independents. I used to run some of them for Warner Bros and Orion pictures years ago.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-23-2003 03:30 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Semantics, when I say that California isn't a blind booking state, what I mean is that there is no blind booking law on the books requiring them to place a screening here.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-23-2003 03:52 PM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What's "blind booking" mean?

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-23-2003 06:31 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hollywood used the practice called "blind booking" (or "block
booking") to be sure to control the distribution of their films.

blind booking The practice of renting out films to exhibitors without showing the films to the exhibitors first.

block booking The practice of scheduling a large number of movies for a theatre, combining a few good movies with many second-rate features.

In 1938, The U.S. Supreme Court decided that the major film studios represented a monopoly, and in United States vs. Paramount Pictures, a major antitrust action was initiated.

Two years later--these legal things take a while--after denying any monopolistic practices, the studios agreed to stop buying theaters, eliminate blind booking (requiring theaters to rent films without seeing them first), and limit block booking to five films.

But, that didn't fix things, and four years later the major studios still held major control over the motion picture industry--especially when it came to first-run exhibition of films in major cities.

All the previous material was googled and doesn't represent any great knowledge on my part.

Some states have Blind Booking laws that state that a movie has to have an exhibitor's screening in the state so the exhibitors have a chance to see it before they book it. The joke of the matter is that there is never enough time. Most films are booked before the exhibitor's screening. But because of the law, studios are required to run exhibitor's screenings in those states. California doesn't have a Blind Booking law, the studios would have never let it happen.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Mueller
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1687
From: Port Gamble, WA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-23-2003 06:39 PM      Profile for Greg Mueller   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Mueller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Interesting
Thanks Ian

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 11-23-2003 09:38 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe the term in question was really blind bidding not booking. It wasn't so much the booking that was the issue but the fact that the exhibitors were being asked for large guarantees. From what I have been told by people in that end of things business isn't really done that way much anymore.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.