Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Tornado Fuel saver

   
Author Topic: Tornado Fuel saver
Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 08-20-2003 06:46 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has anyone tried this thing?? It's supposed to cause a "tornado" out of the air intake in your car. The thoery is sound, but it's pretty expensive, just wondering if anyone has any experience with it.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-20-2003 08:51 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Again, BAH!

I think the CVCC engine in the Honda automobiles used that principle years back. Voltswagon Diesels, too? It was effective, but as far as an exceedingly expensive "hang-on-the-engine" device is concerned, would you really yield any savings over the life of the car? As an example, why spend 600 bucks on a device that will save you 400 bucks? It does not make financial sense to me....

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-20-2003 10:06 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the Tornado is like $70. Not a fortune, but not cheap either, especially if it doesn't work. I've been tempted to try one though.

Not to change the subject, but when I switched from regular oil to Mobil One synthetic, my mileage went up almost 10%. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Hipp
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1462
From: Mesquite, Tx (east of Dallas)
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 08-20-2003 10:59 PM      Profile for Chris Hipp   Email Chris Hipp   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The website for the tornado says that you need 2 for an f150, I dont see why, if it was jsut for one I would probably go ahead and buy it, but if I have to spend $140 then I'd like someone to tell me if it works or not.

Z-max is good for mileage also. My truck had pretty poor acceleration before I put the stuff in, but it's prefectly smooth now. Still slow though.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-21-2003 12:15 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The F-150 must have dual air intakes or split manifolds or something.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean M. Grimes
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 247
From: Lunenburg, MA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-21-2003 01:31 PM      Profile for Sean M. Grimes   Author's Homepage   Email Sean M. Grimes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I tried the tornado about a year ago in my jeep cherokee. When I first got it (without doing an engine tune up) I saw about a four gallon increase on the highway (from here to boston, no traffic late night driving) and about two around town. 17mpg/24. After a tuneup 18/25... is it worth it? Depends on the intake system. A good intake filter (k&n) and a tornado in an "awakard" no direct system, probably worth it, and will repay itself in about a year, and save you money after that. In most new cars? probably not. [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Miller
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 973
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 08-21-2003 02:53 PM      Profile for Jon Miller   Email Jon Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David wrote.
quote:
The F-150 must have dual air intakes or split manifolds or something.
The electronic fuel-injected 300-cid (4.9l) straight six like in the one in my '89 has, for lack of a better term, a two-barrel throttle body. A siamesed pair of hoses runs from the air intake/filter box to the throttle body. I believe the 302 (5.0l) and 351 (5.8l) EFI V-8 truck engines from the late 1980s up until 1997 also had the same induction system.

[Edited to include picture:]
 -

[ 08-21-2003, 07:00 PM: Message edited by: Jon Miller ]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.