my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Peter O'Toole turns down Honorary Oscar

Author Topic: Peter O'Toole turns down Honorary Oscar Bill Gabel Film God Posts: 3873 From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-29-2003 04:02 PM                     Peter O'Toole (70)was to get a Honorary Oscar at this Academy Awards Show. He has asked the Academy to defer the honor until he is 80.  |  IP: Logged Adam Martin I'm not even gonna point out the irony. Posts: 3686 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 01-29-2003 04:40 PM                     The article at CNN.com: Thanks, no: O'Toole may decline Oscar HOLLYWOOD, California (Variety) -- The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences wants to give Peter O'Toole an honorary Oscar, but he's not sure he wants to be saluted. After the Academy last week announced that it would salute the 70-year-old actor, he sent a handwritten open letter to AMPAS stating he was "enchanted" by the gesture, but said that since he is "still in the game and might win the lovely bugger outright, would the Academy please defer the honor until I am 80?" Academy president Frank Pierson on Tuesday told Daily Variety, "We will have the Oscar for him and if he cares to pick it up, that would be great." The hope is that he will change his mind. O'Toole, famed for his eccentricity as well as his talent, has been nominated for seven actor Oscars but has never won. Saying that the mood at the Academy is "bemused and sorry," Pierson added, "it would be great if he decides to change his mind and join us." Pierson this week sent a letter to the actor saying, "The board unanimously and enthusiastically voted you the honorary award because you've earned and deserved it. ... As to being 'in the game,' nobody ever thought you were out of it. The award is for achievement and contribution to the art of the motion picture, not for retirement." Pireson pointed out Tuesday that Paul Newman and Henry Fonda, for example, won competitive Oscars after receiving honorary awards. Pierson contested another aspect of O'Toole's letter: The actor wrote that "the board of the Academy had informal talks with my agent, during which conversations the subject of the Academy having it in mind to award me an honorary Oscar was presented." The Academy president emphasized to Daily Variety that there were no informal talks, "we don't negotiate and it's not contingent upon anyone appearing." AMPAS execs and Oscarcast producer Gil Cates will discuss what to do in the event O'Toole does not show up. This is uncharted territory: In the past, winning actors such as Marlon Brando and George C. Scott have refused the Oscar, but no honorary winner has ever declined the prize. In the cases of Brando and Scott, the name plates on the statuettes were unmarked, since no one knew the winners until the envelope was opened; thus, there were no official Oscars ever designated for those two. The O'Toole situation is different as his name will be inscribed on the statuette. Academy executive director Bruce Davis said there will be a physical statuette at the March 23 ceremony, and if O'Toole decides not to attend, it will go into the Academy's vault. As Pierson's letter told O'Toole, the statuette "will be at the Academy for you to pick up when you're 80 or whenever you're ready." O'Toole was nominated in the lead actor category for "Lawrence of Arabia" (1962), "Becket" (1964), "The Lion in Winter" (1968), "Goodbye, Mr. Chips" (1969), "The Ruling Class" (1972), "The Stunt Man" (1980) and "My Favorite Year" (1982). Othe previous honorary recipients include D.W. Griffith, Bob Hope (twice), Gene Kelly, Jean Renoir, Alex North, Federico Fellini, Chuck Jones and Sidney Poitier. Copyright 2003 Reuters.  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 01-29-2003 05:05 PM                        Why did George Scott refuse to accept the Award? I vaguely remember Brando didn`t want it because he wanted to protest against something, was it the bad treatment of ethnic minorities?  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 01-29-2003 05:49 PM                     If I recall right, George C. Scott refused his Best Actor Oscar for "Patton" because he didn't feel acting was any kind of contest. It is an expressive artform and not a sport.  |  IP: Logged William Leland III Master Film Handler Posts: 336 From: Charleston, SC, Registered: Aug 2002 posted 01-29-2003 07:48 PM                        Also George C. Scott didn't like Patton. He didn't believe what Patton believed (Patton believed very heavlily in recantion). I think George C. Scott thought Patton was a war nutt. He realized that it was a great script and could help his career so he did the role.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.