my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » U S film industry unions or associations. (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: U S film industry unions or associations. John Spooner Expert Film Handler Posts: 186 From: South Australia, Australia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 01-23-2003 11:32 AM                     Dear U S colleagues. I am one of the seemingly few Australian projectionists on this forum and would take this opportunity to ask yourselves what unions or professional associations cover projectionists and cinema industry workers in the U S? In Australia we are covered by the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance, which covers print/electronic media journalists and workers, actors and performers(equity) and amusement industry workers such as live theatre employees, cinema industry workers and outdoor workers such as theme parks and suchlike. Secondly at the end of most credits , there is a symbol of a film spool and the letters "iatse". What does this mean and what actually is this organization? Best wishes to all my fellow colleagues everywhere. John Spooner. Adelaide. South Australia, Australia. "skunk@bigbutton.com.au"  |  IP: Logged Joe Beres Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 606 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 01-23-2003 11:39 AM                     I.A.T.S.E. stands for The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees. From their website:" The IATSE is the labor union representing technicians, artisans and craftspersons in the entertainment industry, including live theatre, film and television production, and trade shows."  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 01-23-2003 11:50 AM                       The IA was over, when they took projectionists out of their official name. When the union gives up on ya...  |  IP: Logged Gerard S. Cohen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 975 From: Forest Hills, NY, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 01-23-2003 01:42 PM                     Joe & Tim: It's "International Alliance of Theatrical AND Stage employees." (International covers Canada, the US, Puerto Rico, Guam, and various Carribbean and Pacific Islands.) The term "Projectionists" is still part of the title of locals which consist of projectionists, viz.: LOCAL 306 PROJECTIONISTS, although as newer crafts have been added in the film and video editing fields, their titles are often added. Where a local in a geographical area has a mixture of crafts (lighting, stage hands, camera operators, editors, makeup, costume and hairdressing , for example , the term "Projectionists" may not appear. In the IATSE directory, these locals are listed as "Mixed." In film centers like New York and Los Angeles, there are enough members for each craft to have its own local, such as "IATSE Local 644, Camera Operators."  |  IP: Logged Joe Beres Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 606 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 01-23-2003 02:19 PM                     Gerard, I got my information directly from the IA website. I checked because I couldn't remember if it was alliance or association. Here is what is directly next to the I.A.T.S.E. logo on the header of thier Home Page: The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employes, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, Its Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 01-23-2003 05:47 PM                    That's the more recent incarnation of the name. For a long time it was the "International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture Machine Operators of the United States and Canada." Just so you know, John, besides IATSE as a shortened acronym for the full name, many will simply shorten it to "the I. A." or pronounce the partial acronym as a word: "eye-AHT-see"  |  IP: Logged Gerard S. Cohen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 975 From: Forest Hills, NY, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 01-23-2003 06:51 PM                     Joe & Steve: Thanks for updating me. I stand corrected. Everything changes. My 1996 IATSE union card reads "MOTION PICTURE PROJECTIONS,[sic] OPERATORS AND VIDEO TECHNICIANS AND ALLIED CRAFTS...Local Union 306 of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States and Canada. Affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, Congress of Industrial Organizations and Canadian Labour Congress." I dare say the 2003 title may be even longer, as I believe the IATSE has had some success organizing the ground floor personnel. My projectionist license was issued by the New York City Department of Gas, Water Supply and Electricity. That became something like like General Administration, before becoming The NYC Department of Consumer Affairs. What once was supervised by technical people is now mostly a license revenue collecting agency. John: In the US, besides unions, there are the motion picture Societies, which seek and disseminate to their members knowledge and standards of their technical crafts. Such is the A.S.C., the American Society of Cinematographers, the A.S.E. (editors), the S.M.P.T.E. (Society of Motion Picture & Television Engineers,) etc. Similar groups exist in the U.K. and elsewhere. There are also fraternal "clubs" which belong to the major national or international ones, such as the Masonic Projectionists Square Clubs, found in major cities. To the above one must add the Show West, Show East, Drink Nite, Seafood Dinners, and cross-country caravans to visit theatres and screening rooms where work and lurk the members of Film-tech.  |  IP: Logged Aaron Sisemore Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day! Posts: 3061 From: Rockwall TX USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 01-23-2003 06:58 PM                     Secondly at the end of most credits , there is a symbol of a film spool and the letters "iatse". What does this mean and what actually is this organization? The logo for IATSE is actually a five-pointed star-type device, not a film spool. The 'film spool' emblem is actually the logo for the Motion Picture Association Of America and its presence in a film's credits signifies that the film was submitted to the MPAA's ratings board. There should also be a serial number adjacent to the logo as well. -Aaron  |  IP: Logged Paul Mayer Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under! Posts: 3836 From: Albuquerque, NM Registered: Feb 2000 posted 01-23-2003 09:20 PM                        Another union would be NABET--National Association of Broadcast Employees and Technicians. Starting in the late '80s NABET agressively pursued contracts for film technicians as well as television. Several theatrical films made during that time had the NABET bug in the credits instead of the IA bug. Haven't seen the NABET bug anywhere lately though. Even after the name change, I think IATSE still holds the distinction of having the longest name of any union in the AFL-CIO. Since the IA reorganization and name change in 1995, the formerly separate IATSE cameraman locals (644 in NY, 659 in LA, 666 in Chicago) were combined into one "national local"--Local 600. Consolidation of other crafts occurred at about the same time--in LA my dad's Local 776 (editors and tape operators) merged with Local 695 (sound) and Local 165 (studio projectionists) and others to become Local 700, the Motion Picture Editors Guild. Some other craft guilds, unions, and professional associations in the North American motion picture and television industry: SOC - Society of Operating Cameramen CAS - Cinema Audio Society SBE - Society of Broadcast Engineers WGA - Writers Guild of America DGA - Directors Guild of America MPSE - Motion Picture Sound Editors IBEW - International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers AMPAS - Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences--the "Oscar" folks There's lots of others...  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 01-23-2003 11:17 PM                       Gerard, et.al., as Steve noted, I was referring to when they removed "Moving Picture Machine Operators" from the official name of the union. That was there almost from the beginning. When it was removed, it signified the death knell for projectionists. After all, the IA had failed miserably to protect the craft years prior. The precedent of scabs running booths alongside card-carrying members should never have been allowed. In recent years, IA reps from the International seemed to be more on the side of management; assuming submissive postures and pushing locals to accept, without question, "take it or leave it" offers. No help in negotiation, just a "Sorry, you're on your own" attitude, as they threw you to the wolves. I will remember that. However, I've been pleased to know some of the Canadian locals have been very successful in creating and maintaining projectionist contracts -- no thanks to the International, I'm sure.  |  IP: Logged John Spooner Expert Film Handler Posts: 186 From: South Australia, Australia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 01-24-2003 12:31 PM                     Dear colleagues. Thank you sincerely for all your replies and disscussion re my enquiry concerning unions and associations. I particularly noted the professional undercurrent of concern and disappointment that the union had let the projectionists down to their disadvantage and the integrity of our profession. As a matter of interest, the address of our Australian association is "www.alliance.org.au" As a matter of interest also, some of the politics disscussed occurred here also a while back. Finally, and a new topic, are projectionist,s licenses required in the U S , or were they done away with as happened here in South Australia. We had the highest degree of professional excellence in presentation in Australia when trade licences were required in this state, since they were scrapped the whole thing went the way we expected, straight down. What is the experience over there. Regards. John Spooner, Adelaide, South Australia. "skunk@bigbutton.com.au"  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 01-25-2003 12:17 PM                       John, the state of Massachusetts here in the US still requires projectionist licenses. I think New York City does, too, but I'm not certain about that. In Massachusetts, however, it's really only another means of income for the government. Paying for the license and exam is only a formality as the test questions and answers are widely distributed. It's useless as a regulation device.  |  IP: Logged Barry Martin Expert Film Handler Posts: 203 From: Newington, CT USA Registered: Jul 2002 posted 01-25-2003 02:33 PM                        You said it Tim, that was one of the most ridiculous tests I ever took. Mostly having to do with ventilation and space between equipment/walls I felt like I was testing to be a building inspector of sorts. I wouldn't have minded all that information if there was still a test involving threading a machine properly and safe handling of Xenon bulbs/large electrical loads. My worst thought is that some kid is going to be doing something wrong when a chain hires them and "trains" them, they get hurt and knocked unconcious, think about how long it might take for someone to notice and come upstairs to check. Even a properly trained person, there were little steps in my booth, what if I fell down them? Heart attack? There were some shifts when I didn't need to say a word to the "floorstaff" or come down for anything. And I see I'm in a bit of a morbid mood today....  |  IP: Logged Ron Lacheur Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 650 From: British Columbia, Canada Registered: Feb 2002 posted 01-25-2003 03:51 PM                     Tim, I don't know about the other provinces, but in BC the IA still exists but in less than good conditions. Most of the big theatre chains don't want nothing to do with them. In the mean time, one chain is offering a real shitty wage. This may have changed since the last I heard ( April 2002 ) but one union projectionist strongly recommended that I didn't waste my time joining the union.  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 01-25-2003 04:54 PM                    Tim wrote: The precedent of scabs running booths alongside card-carrying members should never have been allowed. I don't know about that. I can see that that is a realistic solution. With the coming of xenon, platters, and automation it is true that a highly skilled person is not needed simply to lace up each show and push the button. But the experience and skills of a career (possibly but not necessarily union) projectionist are needed to take care of the little problems that come up, do minor repairs, make sure shows are built properly, and make sure that the semi skilled operators know what they are doing and do it with a sense of showmanship. When management is bent on slashing costs and the "new" (for thirty years now...) technology makes them think that they can just hire anyone at minimum wage to run the booth then the idea of a highly skilled and well compensated professional to act as a head projectionist is one way of preserving a certain number of good jobs.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.