Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Help with projector choice (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Help with projector choice
Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 04:40 AM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

Dear All

I am hunting around for a second hand projector at present and want to get one with a cinemascope lens.

So far I have found ads for the following from one chap in Canberra;

The following has a ENN lamp (less bright)

1. Bell & Howe 1680 $125 Green model

The following have ELC globes (brighter)

2. Bell & Howe 1692 $175 (Charcoal)

3. Bell & Howe 1695 $195 Green Specialist comes with new gear & still frame

4. Hokushin Sc10 $125

5. Eiki SL1 $185 ([practically new, comes with cinemascope bracket)

6. Eiki RT1 $90

None of the above come with cinemascope lens - that will cost an extra $125 although he may have some for $80.

In addition there was an ELMO C16 for sale for $140 in the Trading Post here in Melbourne.

Which of the above would you recommend I buy and why? Essentially I am looking for a reliable 16mm projector that I want to show old films in scope on at home eg What's Up Doc and Grease. Any there any dangers or pitfalls associated with any of the above models?

Your 16mm thoughts please

Cheers Peter


 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 05:08 AM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would avoid the hell and bowell machines if possible. The Eiki's are better machines. Bell and howell's later halogen machines were good, but their earlier stuff is questionable, IMHO.

This is more of a question for Ken Layton or Scott Norwood, more up their alley

Josh


 |  IP: Logged

Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 05:15 AM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Josh

Yes I too have heard evil things about the Bell & Howe machines. I did read somewhere though that Eiki was no longer going to provide support for its machines.

I plan on using my projector for home outdoor use with an outdoor screen. The idea is to show old favourites like Whats Up Doc and Grease on hot balmy summer nights. I think it would be fun to screen movies at home, particularly if I can get the presentation ok.

The only downside of 16mm that I have seen so far is that the sound is mono but I will probably get around that by building a stereo synthethiser. They are available as kits here in Australia.

I might add I have also seen the following projector B&H on Ebay Australia but I will probably avoid that B&H as well.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1375399964

cheers Peter


 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 08-23-2002 05:56 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Peter,

Where will you get the prints once you get set up with a very good 16mm projector and a scope lens? I have heard 16mm prints are hard to find unless you can find someone who collects them. When 16mm was used a lot before video became popular, Honolulu had a film rental store where anyone can rent full lenght feature films. The Hawaii public library also had a 16mm film collection but almost all of the titles were single reel educational films. When I was still in grade school, I had a neighbor who did exactly what you are planning. He had set up a nice little booth at one end of his spacious yard and a good size 'flat' screen at the other end. All the movies he presented were flat pictures because 16mm scope prints were not yet available for home exhbition. Some of the films I remember seeing was "THE JUNGLE BOOK" with Sabu , "THE EMPEROR JONES" with Paul Robson and "THE SALT OF THE EARTH". The sound was played back through a very ancient speaker and because stereo sound was not too common even in theatres, the sound was not bad. I sure wish I lived near you because I love to watch movies in an open air setting during the summer like I did when Mr. Minnor put on his picture show for all of his neighbors many years ago.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-23-2002 06:29 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'd go with the newer machines if possible, for parts availability reasons. Avoid B&H (or any other brand) "autoload" machines at all costs. Unless something has changed very recently, Eiki continues to sell 16mm projectors, so parts availability shouldn't be an issue. On the other hand, Eikis tend to be less-than-forgiving with damaged film, so that may be an issue if your prints are warped, shrunken, etc.

Are those prices in US dollars or Australian dollars? They seem very high for US currency. You should be able to get a great portable machine for about $100.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 08:00 AM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks everyone for your help

I have some good news - I have made my decision! The following is what I have settled on.

I'm sending a cheque off tomorrow for the following

- 1 x Eiki SL1 (about 1983-83) projector, practically new, ELC globe (24v 250 watts) including scope bracket
- 1 x cinemascope anomorphic lens $80
- postage $32

After reviewing everyone's feedback I decided to give the Bell & Howes a miss. I didn't think it worth the risk. The Eiki SL1 was more expensive but did come with the scope bracket, was somewhat newer and had the 250 watt globe. The RT1 and Hokishan had 200 watt globes. Like all projectionists I just want more grunt!

Hopefully this time next week my new projector will have arrived and I can start to have some fun.

Claude, we have a number of distributors in Australia that supply films on 16mm, namely Roadshow Non-theatrical, 16mm Australia, Ronin Films etc. I don't anticipate that finding films to rent will be a problem. Some distributors like 16mm Australia can be a bit pricey however. Someone said to me that I could rent 16mm films from Roadshow Non-theatrical for as little as $25. I'm also told that newer films are now provided letterboxed so I won't need my anormorphic lens for these. Yes, it will be fun to project films for my family and friends. I might even show some French films for memebers of my the French class I attend.

Scott, the SL1 was manufactured about 1983-84 so of the projectors I listed , it is one of the newer ones. Having the brighter bulb and scope bracket is also helpful and worth the extra money in my opinion. By the way the prices are all in Australian dollars so halve them to get the $US equivalent.

Thanks everyone for your help. Now I just have to work out a way to fit a 2000w bulb to my new projector (more light, more light...)

It will be interesting to see how, picture quality-wise, the 16mm projected image stacks up against digital.

cheers Peter

ps I have looked at some photos of the SL1 but can't work out where I plug in my computer yet.








 |  IP: Logged

Joe Beres
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 606
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 09:33 AM      Profile for Joe Beres   Email Joe Beres   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter, I think you made the right choice. I have used many Eiki projectors and find them to be among the most reliable. The scope bracket is nice too, and that will usually run $45 US on top of the cost of a projector. I assume the prices you listed were in Australian Dollars? If so, you didn't get too bad a deal at all. Have fun!

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Taylor
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 601
From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 10:44 AM      Profile for Jeff Taylor   Email Jeff Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a large 16mm collection, so I'll throw in my opinion. The Eiki is a good choice (I have several), and if you really get hooked look into their EX series xenon machines. They come in 350 and 550 watts, and remember that "xenon watts" generate far more lumens than incandescent. For example, the ELC lamp in your machine is 250 watts and generates about 650 lumens from with the standard three-bladed shutter, or about 850 with a two-bladed shutter (easy conversion and well worth the $8 (US) cost of the shutter). The current 350 watt xenon model is rated at 2000 lumens, and the 550 watt at 2500 lumens, and the lamps last 1000-2000 hours without a sweat. Scott is right on parts availability, but beware that even Eiki is rumored to be ready to exit the US 16mm market, with parts availability to be determined. In case nobody mentioned it, the Hokushin SC210 is also a lovely machine--I have 4 in the attic, but IMHO the unique Eiki scope bracket is such a convenience I'd pick it over anything else. Eiki scope lenses are actually made by Kowa, so don't pay extra for one with the Eiki name on the barrel.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 08-23-2002 12:31 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I do not recall anyone mentioning it but were they any prints released in 16mm with a Dolby A or SR soundtrack? If there were, how was the sound quality compared to the 35mm version?

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Taylor
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 601
From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 12:50 PM      Profile for Jeff Taylor   Email Jeff Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Supposedly Dolby worked on an improved sound reader for the venerable Eastman 25 series machines some years ago when AMC was experimenting with 16mm in some of their smaller houses. I BELIEVE that 50 screens or so were ultimately equipped. I can't tell you what kind of encoding was used, but supposedly the project was abandoned when labs found it difficult to strike prints with sufficiently exact registration to maintain theatrical quality image steadiness with that much magnification. Ultimately the project was dropped and ICECO liquidated the projectors. There's some material on the subject on Film Center.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 08-23-2002 05:33 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was Dolby A and the sound system for that "Project HQ" was designed by Kintek. It was not a problem for some of the labs to print better registered prints, but when Stanley Durwood (of AMC Theatres) died, the remaining upper level executives just didn't want to f**k with 16mm and dropped the program altogether and sold everything to Steve Krams at International Cinema.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-23-2002 10:20 PM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

Hi again

Cheque was sent today so all I have to do is sit back and wait for the courier to arrive.

I find it interesting though that super-8 has better sound quality than 16mm yet 16mm has the superior visual quality. As I understand it 16mm had an optical audio mono track and super-8 magnetic stereo. Odd that a poorer quality visual medium would have superior sound.

Naturally having now sorted out which projector to buy I need something to show on it. I've been advised to get an old reel of 16mm and play around with the projector a bit before mashing up one of Roadshow's prints. Seems like a good idea. Perhaps readers could list some of the common mistakes that newbies make with 16mm and how not to mash up your film on your first attempt. I'm sure, notwithstanding the experience of everyone on this forum, that you have some horror stories about things you did to prints when first starting out.

Also at some stage I would not mind getting a used print of 'Grease' on 16mm. I have hunted around on the internet but no-one seems to be selling any. What coudl I expect to pay for a used print of that film?

Interestingly one print I did come across of Grease was in super-8
format
http://netfora.com/films.html

It is for sale for 25 pounds which seems quite good value. My father-in law owns a super-8 projector which I could show it on. I have a couple of questions about super-8.

1. For home use does super-8 give good visual quality? What size image can you project with a reasonable picture? How would it stack up against dvd or video?

2. The super-8 print for sale is wide screen but not scope. I don't quite understand what is meant by widescreen. I understand scope to mean using an anomorphic lens to stretch the picture wider. Would a widescreen print be letterboxed or have the ends of the picture cut off?

cheers Peter


 |  IP: Logged

Josh Jones
Redhat

Posts: 1207
From: Plano, TX
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 08-24-2002 01:13 AM      Profile for Josh Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Josh Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DTS has developed a system for 16mm which just replaces the analog track with timecode. Results I heard were quite good. The only thing really limiting 16mm sound is the track size. the film grain makes the track very noisy if a stereo reader system is utilized, which is why it was never really developed.

If i was going to buy a good 16mm machine, I would look for an Eastman 25 or possibly the television version, the 285. Those machine are the catalac of 16mm machines, or at least the were. Plus they use geneva movements.

Josh

------------------
"Film is made of silver, video is made of rust"
'nuf said


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-24-2002 04:35 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I've always liked the Eiki line of 16mm projectors. I have had the least amount of trouble with them and never, ever had a film get scratched on one of them nor jam. (Maybe I'm just lucky, but them's the facts.)

Regarding Super 8, you can blow it up a whole lot easier in a short throw situation than 16mm. Just TRY and find a short focal length lens for a 16mm projector of the kind of quality available in Super 8mm machines at any kind of comparable price. Also, there are many models of Super 8mm machines in which you can put an arc lamp in. I've done it to Eumig S926, Elmo ST-600, ST-1200, and GS-1200 models, but certainly this can be accomodated into other models depending on their design. If you really want to do it right, get yourself a Beaulieu 708EL Pro and drill out the back of the lamp cover, then get you an external xenon lamphouse and go to town! So long as you have a whole lot of forced air for cooling and a heat shield, you'll be just fine. I've put a 2000 watt lamphouse behind my Beaulieu before!

While I'm thinking about it, have you ever compared the actual image size of a 16mm frame to a Super 8mm frame? Remember that the 16mm perforations are quite large, as is the mono optical soundtrack. The difference is really not all that much. Plus you can buy brand new prints from Derann films in the UK (as well as other vendors) for around $300 US. Why be stuck paying top dollar for old used library and airline prints of 16mm movies, mostly in 1.33 aspect ratio and all of them in optical mono when you can get brand new prints of recent full length feature films?

Also, Super 8 prints can be re-recorded for much higher fidelity than the labs provide. If you use FilmGuard on them, there will not be any dropouts in the tracks and as such you will be able to encode with dbx noise reduction for damn near cd quality (better than 35mm optical tracks).

Now if you're REALLY serious about wanting some incredible sound from Super 8mm, you can simply record the timecode signal onto the magnetic track 2. Then of course record a mono mix-down of the audio on track 1. This way you can output the signal into a dts player for full 6 channel digital sound WITH A BACKUP AUDIO SIGNAL!


 |  IP: Logged

Bernard Tonks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Cranleigh, Surrey, England
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-24-2002 07:29 AM      Profile for Bernard Tonks   Email Bernard Tonks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter wrote,
quote:
Naturally having now sorted out which projector to buy I need something to show on it. I've been advised to get an old reel of 16mm and play around with the projector a bit before mashing up one of Roadshow's prints.

I would invest in a good 2nd hand 16mm Tape Film Splicer, acetate cement splicing is a thing of the past, and won't join polyester stock anyway. A bench type Rewinder is a must, and a couple of new spare spools.

Most 16mm prints found damaged on receipt is because they are rarely checked properly before despatch, if at all! Be a professional projectionist, and always carefully examine all splices. Damaged perforations can be difficult to detect on 16mm, best method IMO is to lightly grip the perforation side between finger and thumb, by which nature you will not harm the picture area. I would also clean each reel gently with a large Selvyt, changing to a clean part of the cloth say 3 or 4 times during a 1600’ spool. Practice makes perfect, and you will have the satisfaction and guarantee of a trouble free show every time. You also do not want to be held responsible for someone else’s carelessness, report all serious faults.

That’s some of the procedures I did for my 16mm home cinema many years ago. The kitchen became the projection box showing through an optical glass porthole into the living room with a throw of 25’ onto a solid 12’ masked screen with three adjustable ratios, for academy, wide, & scope. The projector was an RCA Hollywood which I converted to 24 volt 250 watt QI lighting, and long running 5000’ reels. I even had an aperture plate made for 1.85 machined within a set of gate runners. Picture and sound was magnificent at that time, so don’t be put off just having mono! I was most fortunate to get my films free with trade contacts. Always two features we held most shows on Friday nights, great great fun! I think it is safe to reveal now that I run “The Battle Of Britain” 5 days before the world premiere at the Dominion Theatre.

I’m sure you will get as much enjoyment with your projector. But be careful Peter, you could finish up like me and run a full-time cinema for 25 years.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.