Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Faster direction?

   
Author Topic: Faster direction?
Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-02-2001 07:37 AM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi all

I recently saw 'Les Visiteurs II" on video and thought it a very ordinary sequel. My question though revolves around one feature of this film which I have also seen duplicated in Moulin Rouge.

Director Jean-Marie Poire insisted on pulverising the audience's senses with shot after shot after shot in quick succession all the way through the film. Baz Luhrmann did the same thing in Moulin Rouge although to be fair at least he slowed down the pace towards the end of the film.

I can understand moments of pacy direction in times when particular action scenes are being shot. I think the logic is that one uses many camera shots to visually keep the audience informed about what is happening and to add excitement. I can't understand the logic of using such pacy direction (arguably overkill in terms of the number of camera shots used) all the way through the film.

Is this technique an attempt to appeal to younger generations who perhaps have become used to faster imagery due to video games? Have others noticed some directors overusing camera shots recently?

cheers Peter


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 07-02-2001 09:54 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Styles" come and go. Many of the "hot" filmmakers today got their start making television commercials, where some "razzle dazzle" is often needed to keep the viewer from changing channels. Many also come from a music video background. Other threads have discussed the use of handheld (not even a Steadicam) cameras, as popularized by television shows like NYPD Blue. The style can be very appropriate for some films, but is very distracting in others. IMHO, fast cuts and shaky camerawork are more tolerable on a small TV screen than on a large movie screen.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-02-2001 12:02 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I prefer to call it "fast editing" but obviously the director had a say in it. I don't mind it as long as it doesn't last too long. Don't get me wrong, I hate slow editing as well!

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-03-2001 04:06 AM      Profile for Peter Berrett   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Berrett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

I think I've found out why.

Have a look at this article
http://www.screenwritersutopia.com/pros/preston/preston_03.html

I found the following quote interesting.

"Michael said that fast editing is usually required in commercials aimed at younger viewers because they have a regrettably short attention span"

Fast editing may work for younger viewers but for me (age 36) it is just disconcerting!

Fast editing. Just say No!

cheers Peter

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.