Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film-Yak   » Digital Cameras (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Digital Cameras
Andrew McCrea
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 645
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-30-2001 06:52 PM      Profile for Andrew McCrea   Author's Homepage   Email Andrew McCrea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is the current lowest price for a digital camera and where can it be bought?

------------------
Andrew McCrea

"I'm Not Bad, I'm Just Drawn That Way!" - Jessica Rabbit

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-30-2001 07:53 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lowest price or cheapest isn't usualy the best mesure of a camera or any toy for that matter.

I use a Kodak DC280 Zoom to great effect. They are down in the $399 range now. Kodak has a newer 3 megapixel camera that I lust after (DC480 Zoom) and Sony has a very nice, very small 3 megapixel camera that I like (DSC-P1).

But I have heard you can get a digital camera for free just by signing up for a magazine subscription. But would I use it? I think not!

Check out www.cnet.com for comparisons and prices.


 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-30-2001 07:55 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
A word of caution: You get what you pay for.

I spent a pretty penny for mine (Olympus D-300L), but I've dropped it off of a theater roof in 1998 and it is still in use today. Of course, my heart isn't the same.

(Who the hell wanted that grand opening picture of the parking lot anyway?)


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-31-2001 01:12 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Get the Casio that Brad Miller, Tom Barnes and Jeff Skallan all have. It only costs $1000 US, but I'm sure your parents will be willing to buy it for you.

If you get too cheap, you might as well just draw the picture you want to take with your mouse on the computer!

I hear it takes 25 days for US checks to clear in Canada. True?

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-31-2001 06:49 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here is a link to information about the Kodak digital cameras:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/digital/cameras/DCSGateway.jhtml

Here are some other links about using digital photography:
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/consumer/digitalBridge/

Here is a link to Kodak's interactive Digital Learning Center to learn about digital technology:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/digital/dlc/

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew McCrea
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 645
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-31-2001 08:57 AM      Profile for Andrew McCrea   Author's Homepage   Email Andrew McCrea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanx...

But i'd rather get a scanner, now!

------------------
Andrew McCrea

"I'm Not Bad, I'm Just Drawn That Way!" - Jessica Rabbit

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-31-2001 04:48 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a older Kodak DC150

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-31-2001 05:20 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So I go on the website that John has linked and discover that not only will Kodak give $100 off on a new DC4800 but that they will give me $200 trade in value on my old DC2800.

So I ordered up a new DC4800.

Boy am I glad I bought Kodak.

Of course I didn't really need to spend another $300 just to take web smaps. So far I will have spent $1,000 on this Digital Photo hobby.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 03-31-2001 06:49 PM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have a Sony MAVICA with the 3.5in floppy disks. While it's great for road trips and long terms away from home... it ABSOLUTELY sucks in low light situations. I bought the thing to save money on my theatre photos that I take EVERYWHERE I go, but what I didn't stop to think about is how well it would take a picture of the inside of an auditorium.

In most cases... even with florescent cleaning lights on, it still sucks. But it's GREAT for outside pics during the day.

-Scott

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 03-31-2001 06:53 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Andrew, you really do get what you pay for. Don't even consider anything less than 3.3 megapixels. The Casio QV-3000EX I have takes the most "film like" digital pics of anything I've seen to date. Pricing has come down on it and it can now be had for about $900. If I was reviewing it as a regular item here on the site, I would give it a solid A rating. I'll bet Joe would rate it similarly. Most digital cameras out there would be rated in the "this blows" category. They just have a video look to them. Joe's Epson digital camera takes pretty good pictures too and up until the Casio came along I thought it was the best out there.


 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 04-01-2001 01:16 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heartland America (a mail order company) has a miniature pen-sized camera for $79 (item number S4-99841) or a regular sized digital camera also for $79 (item number S4-9770). Call 1-800-229-2901 or www.heartlandamerica.com

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-01-2001 04:14 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My first question is, "What do you want to do with this camera?"
If you are just going to take pics of friends and family and post them to the internet then you don't need a whole lot of camera. If you are going to print pictures out and just share them with friends, you need a better camera but you still don't need a super-duper camera. If you are planning to use the camera for "professional" work or if you want high quality pictures for a "serious hobby" then you need to get the better cameras.

The camera that I have has two resolution modes:
640 X 480 (For internet pics, etc.)
1152 X 864 (For better quality)

It has a couple different levels of JPEG compression for a total of four different "quality" settings.
This is about all I'll need for the forseeable future. IF I find that I need a better camera I can always buy a better one but for $200 I think I'm doing OK.

What I suggest you MUST get is a camera that has removable storage media. (ie: "Digital Film")
The cameras that have to be connected up to the computer via some kind of "serial cable" are just the PITS! If you get the "digital film" you can remove the memory card and plug it into a reader that is connected to the computer. This gives you two benefits:

You can keep shooting with the camera while you are downloading your first batch of shots.
You have virtually unlimited capacity to store pictures.
Caveat: This assumes you buy more "digital film". (It's not too expensive though... about $50 per.)

There is one brand of camera that I know of that can be had for about $100 but it only has one resolution mode (640 X 480 I think.) If you just want a camera to "play" with and maybe post pics to the 'net, then this is the one that I suggest for you. (Unless you want to spend more $$ to get a better camera.)

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 04-06-2001 12:07 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's a digital camera to meet Joe's need for the ultimate in digital image quality:
Kodak 16 Megapixel Digital Camera

The camera back uses a 4080 x 4080 pixel sensor, with 12-bit color capture, and 16-bit RGB processed file output.
------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 04-06-2001 12:13 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Ooooooooh. I want one! Dare I even ask, how much?

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Price
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1714
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-06-2001 12:55 PM      Profile for Ian Price   Email Ian Price   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, first you got to buy one of these:

Then you have to buy a bunch of lenses.

Then you can buy the Kodak Digital Back. I'm guessing the total cost to somewhere North of $10,000.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.