Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » UK cinemas pull "Blue Story" after riots take place at screenings (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: UK cinemas pull "Blue Story" after riots take place at screenings
Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-24-2019 08:09 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Daily Mail
SECOND cinema chain bans gang film Blue Story after 100-strong machete brawl broke out in front of terrified families queuing for Frozen 2 - as director defends BBC-funded movie as 'about love not violence'

A second cinema chain has banned Blue Story from all its cinemas after a mass brawl in Birmingham last night - as the director defends his BBC-funded movie as 'about love not violence.'

Showcase Cinemas has followed Vue by axing screenings of the gangster film.

Families were at the Nechells multiplex in Star City for the first opening Saturday of Frozen II when the machete-wielding gang turned up.

People were evacuated as Vue cinema managers closed the venue.

Five teenagers, including a 13-year-old girl, have been arrested by police after they swooped at around 5.30pm. They also seized two machetes and a knife from a nearby roundabout.

A senior police chief said today the disorder 'may be the worst thing' the responding officers had seen.

Blue Story director Andrew Onwubolu, known as Rapman, has said the gang film is about 'love not violence', after seven police officers were injured in a disturbance at a screening.

He said on Instagram: 'Sending love to all those involved in yesterday's violence at Star City in Birmingham.

'It's truly unfortunate that a small group of people can ruin things for everybody. Bluestory is a film about love not violence.

'There were also a few incidents earlier this year with the release of The Joker, it's always unfortunate, but I hope that the blame is placed with the individuals and not an indictment of the film itself.

'I pray that we can all learn to live with love and treat each other with tolerance and respect.'

He addressed Vue's decision to no longer show the film, captioning the post: '£Bluestorymovie playing in all major cinema chains except @vue.'

Actor Micheal Ward, who plays Marco in Blue Story and starred in Netflix gang series Top Boy, reposted the statement onto his own social media account.

BBC Films described the film as an 'outstanding, critically acclaimed debut feature which powerfully depicts the futility of gang violence.

'It's an important film from one of the UK's most exciting new filmmakers which we're proud to be part of.'

The film's distributor, Paramount Pictures, said it was 'saddened' by events at Star City, but that it thinks Blue Story is 'an important film' that has had 'incredibly positive reaction and fantastic reviews'.

A spokesman for Showcase Cinemas said: 'The safety of our guests is of the utmost importance.

'Due to the recent incidents tied to screenings of the film 'Blue Story', after careful consideration with the film's distributor, Showcase Cinemas has immediately removed the film from our all of our participating cinemas.'

According to Birmingham Live, the message from Vue said: 'We regret that we will no longer be screening the film Blue Story at any of our venues.

'Should you have a booking for this film, please say cancellation when prompted and a member of our team will be with you shortly to assist you with your booking.'

A spokesman added: 'We can confirm a decision was made to remove the film.

'The safety and welfare of our customers and staff is always our first priority.'

Blue Story is a tragic tale of a friendship between Timmy and Marco, two young boys from warring postcodes in London who become friends but get caught up in gang violence.

Pockets of fighting erupted in a 100-strong crowd at the cinema after a 'group of people arrived with machetes'.

Police officers were assaulted as they descended on the scene armed with guard dogs.

They had tasers, but police said they were not used.

Shocking footage shows young women appearing to push each other as officers try to get control of the situation.

Flashing blue lights are also seen as a group of at least eight officers stands on the pavement outside in front of a large crowd.

West Midlands Police said they would be making further arrests on Sunday or Monday.

Chief Superintendent Steve Graham said the force used by officers was 'proportionate', adding the disorder took 90 minutes to break up because police were not 'heavy-handed'.

A dispersal order was issued to the group of about 100 people.

Mr Graham said it was 'concerning' that some of those involved were so young.

Addressing the safety of people in Birmingham, Mr Graham said: 'Incidents of the scale of disorder we saw last night are rare, not just at Star City but also across the city and the broader West Midlands.

'So if anyone is feeling unsafe I can understand in the immediate wake of that why they might do.

'However Star City is still a safe place to go, Birmingham is still a safe place to go and it's really important that our communities and families feel safe to come out and enjoy themselves.'

A 13-year-old girl, a girl and a boy, both aged 14, and a 19-year-old man were held on suspicion of assaulting police.

A 14-year-old boy was arrested on suspicion of obstructing police.

Asked if he was concerned about the ages of those involved, Mr Graham said: 'It is concerning, there's no point pretending otherwise.

'That's why we've got plans in place, starting from first thing on Monday morning, where we'll be sending neighbourhood policing officers into schools around Birmingham to try and find out why.

'We know that Birmingham isn't unusual in this. Let's not pretend that knife crime or violence in the under 25s is rare or is just isolated around Birmingham.

'There are no short-term fixes to this, so we're prepared and we're in this for the long run and we're going to work with schools and other partners to prevent youth violence becoming an increasing problem.'

Asked where the incident ranked compared with other reports of disorder, Mr Graham said: 'It's always hard to gauge these sorts of things - but what I will say is incidents like last night are rare.

'As for some officers who were there last night, it may be the worst thing they have ever seen.'

One witness said 'a young boy was crying on the floor with his mother' as a number of young people started fighting.

Rachael Allison said: 'The police told everyone to leave the cinema as they held Taser guns in their hands and started to bring in guard dogs.

'I spoke to a policeman who told me it is unclear whether the kids had weapons and also stated when kids fight they bring their group of friends.'

Another witness described it as 'one of the scariest moments of [her] life', as she queued to watch the new Frozen film with her daughter.

Choleigh McGuire said: 'Armed police come, Tasers come, all of the people that were fighting ran off into the cinema, hiding. I am shaking.'

A woman, who claims she was at the cinema with her sister and niece on social media, said she was evacuated by police with tasers and dogs.

'Horrendous being in that situation when it's just you but when you're with children, your family, absolutely terrifying', she said.

'Sickening to have to be evacuated by police with tasers and dogs when all you wanted to do was watch Frozen.'

Another woman told the Mirror: 'That's probably one of the scariest moments of my life.

'Me and my daughter were in a queue to watch frozen, loads of little kids there, all dressed up and everything, then these girls jumped on another girl and loads of these kids just started fighting.

'Armed police came with Tasers. All the people that were fighting run off into the cinema. There's about 15 to 20 police cars. I'm shaking.

'The police were very aggressive there was lots of little kids there.'

On Sunday morning, there were 50-minute waits for refunds for cancelled tickets.

A former Birmingham cinema manager has said the film's distributor should consider pulling Blue Story out of all of the city's cinemas in the wake of the fight last night.

Blue Story, a 15-rated film which came out on Friday, is a London gangland drama about two boys from different postcodes.

The 91-minute film was directed by Andrew Onwubolu aka rap artist Rapman.

Cineworld Broad Street and Odeon Broadway Plaza have also been screening the film but neither has said whether that will change.

Former city cinema manager Michael Mclean said: 'If I was still running a cinema in Birmingham, I would personally make the call to London asking my bosses to pull this film - and the distributor should consider pulling it out of the city, too.

'At the very least, only show it in daytime.

'Cinema staff have an obligation to try to do the right thing (whenever any incident arises).

'But they are not paid to deal with this kind of situation and if I was a manager I would not want to put them at risk - never mind families who just want to see Frozen II.

'Young children should not be seeing this sort of behaviour in cinemas.'

Blue Story was given a 15 certificate by the BBFC which included the following ratings info: 'Very strong language, strong violence, threat, sex, drug misuse.'

It said the film was 'a drama in which a friendship between two boys is jeopardised by gang violence' and that it has 'passed the work uncut.'

The BBFC added there was infrequent use of very strong language ('c') as well as strong language ('f') and other terms.

As for the violence, the BBFC said there were 'shootings and stabbings, with resultant bloody detail. It is implied that two men hold a victim's arm, while a third attacker breaks it with a stamp.'

Recalling his own fears about trouble in his cinema a decade ago, Mr Mclean said he had such doubts about Penny Woolcock's film 1Day (2009) putting his staff at risk that he advised various cinemas across the city not to screen it.

The film explored rivalry in Birmingham and Mr Mclean had understood some real life gang members had been paid to be 'advisors'.

'I called our London office and told them what I thought the risks were,' he said.

'I also rang round all of the city cinemas and, in the end, nobody showed it.

''I knew what could happen if anyone did.

'The night it opened in Wolverhampton, there was a stabbing.

'If I was told I had to a show a film where I thought there was potential for trouble (inside the cinema) I would increase security at the door and only let in peoole who I thought would not be a problem.'

Mr Mclean saw Blue Story on November 15 during an Unlimited screening at Cineworld Broad Street a week before its release.

'The film is about gangland violence in London where two friends end up on rival sides and hunting each other down in a bid to kill the other,' said Mr Mclean.

'It is better made and with better performances than I expected, but I generally don't like that kind of film.

'Though not as violent as Joker, I felt that Blue Story glorified the violence and that there was no redemption - just when we have a massive crime situation going on across the country and in Birmingham city centre.

'Having been in made in London along streets where I have walked, it seemed too close to home, to me.

'I am surprised that something like this has happened at Vue Star City in one sense, but if there has been violence associated with this film then I am also not surprised.'

Mr Mclean added: 'I can remember two previous massive incidents years ago at Star City including one when the cinema had to be shut down then.'

Although some screens have been mothballed, the complex was Britain's biggest cinema with 30 screens.

Warner Village opened it on July 21, 2000, when director Wolfgang Petersen and stars George Clooney and Mark Wahlberg briefly flew in for the premiere of The Perfect Storm.

The site was later taken over by Vue Cinemas which launched a multiplex price war in May, 2018 when tickets bought on site were reduced to £4.99.

In May this year, an inquest jury recorded a verdict of accidental death after father-of-one Ateeq Rafiq, 24, died of a catastrophic brain injury after his head became wedged in an automatic footrest at the Vue Multiplex.

Mr Rafiq and his wife Ayesha Sardar went to the complex at 4.30pm on March 9, 2017, and had been sitting in Gold Class seats, screen 17.

Leading film magazine Empire said of the film: 'It's well told with a worthwhile, if not especially revolutionary message - gang wars are not worth dying for, and you don't have to follow the cycle.'

International magazine Sight & Sound said Blue Story offered 'Sobering scenes from the postcode wars* it's confident work that crucially doesn't condescend to the youth audience best placed to receive its sobering pacifist message.'

Industry magazine Screendaily.com said: 'There's something about Blue Story which is infectious. It might catch on. There's a message in here, and if only the target audience shows up, Rapman's job will have been done.

'Meanwhile, he seems destined for bigger things.'

Blue Story is a tragic tale of a friendship between Timmy and Marco, two young boys from opposing postcodes.

Timmy, a shy, smart, naive and timid young boy from Deptford, goes to school in Peckham where he strikes up a friendship with Marco, a charismatic, streetwise kid from the local area.

Although from warring postcodes, the two quickly form a firm friendship until it is tested and they wind up on rival sides of a street war.

Blue Story depicts elements of Rapman's own personal experiences and aspects of his childhood.

The messages he aims to send through his works are positive ones, aimed at inspiring kids from difficult backgrounds to turn away from local gangs.

Yikes. With the benefit of hindsight, it probably wasn't the best idea to have this movie playing in the same theaters alongside Frozen 2, but I can't remember any film attracting that sort of violence when I was working in British cinemas.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Hall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: London, UK
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 11-25-2019 02:26 AM      Profile for Peter Hall   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Hall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi Leo - lots of coverage in the press here on this. Not quite as violent incident but years ago in NZ, we had protests at the premiere venue for Life of Brian, culminating in quick set cement being poured in the venues toilets and closing the theatre. Own goal for the protestors, the film was moved to an adjacent theatre with twice the seats and the generated publicity ensured that the place was full.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 11-25-2019 04:39 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Yikes. With the benefit of hindsight, it probably wasn't the best idea to have this movie playing in the same theaters alongside Frozen 2, but I can't remember any film attracting that sort of violence when I was working in British cinemas.
Even in hindsight I'd say... WTF?

It's obvious that different movies attract a different type of clientele, I've noticed "rowdy crowds" more often at horror movies and some specific kinds of violent movies.

But still, do we now need to treat movies like soccer matches?!

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-25-2019 05:52 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is the type of controversial film that would best be left to a direct-to-Netflix or some other streaming outlet and just forego public cinemas altogether. If gangs and hoodlums want to chop each other up with machetes in their own homes...let them have at it.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-25-2019 07:58 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The impression I get from the article is that no-one had any idea that it would be that controversial until the gang bangers with machetes showed up.

I remember that occasionally we'd get a controversial arthouse movie that would attract a few protesters (e.g. the David Cronenberg Crash), but I can't ever remember a theatrical release movie being the focus of gang activity.

The Life of Brian was a bit before my time, though I do remember reading a story quite recently (as in, within the last two or three years) about the final city council lifting its ban on the pic, about 35 years after the release. Dozens of councils banned the movie from playing in their cities and counties when it first came out (which of course meant more business for cinemas in the ones that let it play).

 |  IP: Logged

Allan Young
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 125
From: EGHAM, Surrey UK
Registered: Jun 2011


 - posted 11-25-2019 09:55 AM      Profile for Allan Young   Email Allan Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
The Life of Brian was a bit before my time, though I do remember reading a story quite recently (as in, within the last two or three years) about the final city council lifting its ban on the pic, about 35 years after the release.
There's the rather wonderful story about the woman who played Judith in Life of Brian going on to become mayor of Aberystwyth in Wales. She was able to overturn the town's 30-year-old ban on the film and organised a charity screening attended by Michael Palin and Terry Jones.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 11-26-2019 06:08 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Leo Enticknap
The impression I get from the article is that no-one had any idea that it would be that controversial until the gang bangers with machetes showed up.
Judging from the trailer, it's obviously a pretty violent movie, but not unlike we've seen before. I've seen quite a few British-made movies that contained ample of violence, why this particular movie drew such a crowd beats me.

quote: Leo Enticknap
I remember that occasionally we'd get a controversial arthouse movie that would attract a few protesters (e.g. the David Cronenberg Crash), but I can't ever remember a theatrical release movie being the focus of gang activity.
Yeah, it's something many of us might have experienced at one point. My argument always was: A cinema shows movies, it doesn't make them. It would be more biased to not show particular movies, because you don't like them, for whatever reason.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-26-2019 10:58 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Marcel Birgelen
Judging from the trailer, it's obviously a pretty violent movie, but not unlike we've seen before.
The British gangster movie has a very long history, arguably beginning in the late 1940s with films such as They Made Me a Fugitive and Brighton Rock, which depicted the organized crime that sprung up in the immediate aftermath of WWII, when there were a lot of demobbed soldiers and surplus firearms floating around, looking for something to do with themselves. That, plus strict rationing of luxury goods that persisted well into the '50s, created the perfect environment for such activity. However, although these movies were condemned by highbrow critics and the political establishment for their violence, I have never heard of such a movie causing this sort behavior in and around cinemas; either then, or in the 70 years since.

quote: Marcel Birgelen
It would be more biased to not show particular movies, because you don't like them, for whatever reason.
Your priority has to be your customers, surely. If the presence of a given movie in your building puts your customers at risk of violent assault, then IMHO it's a no brainer to keep it out. Cinema staff are not law enforcement officers.

My problem is not with movies that are controversial, and widely publicized as such. All the infamous ones that got the Mary Whitehouse brigade worked up when I was working in UK cinemas in the '90s - Man Bites Dog, Reservoir Dogs, Crash, Romance, etc., were well known to be infamous before they played the first frame, anywhere. So anyone who went to one of those and then complained that they were offended by the sex and/or violence was like someone who climbs into the lion's enclosure at a zoo and then complains at the prospect of being eaten.

More problematic are those films that were badly or dishonestly marketed, giving potential viewers a misleading impression of what was in them. The example that sticks in my mind most of all was Wilde - the posters and trailers gave the impression that it was a Merchant & Ivory-style heritage costume pic, of the sort that goes down well with the 65-plus crowd. So when the buggery scene arrived, dozens were coming out and demanding refunds, some of them visibly upset. There was absolutely no warning in any of the marketing materials that this film contained images that stopped a hair's breadth short of hard core porn. In the aftermath of that, the manager of the cinema I was working at the time started a policy whereby all staff working the opening day were required to attend a preview, either late night the previous night or first thing that morning. The only exception was if the print didn't arrive in time. This was a good idea, and enabled us to catch, and forewarn customers, of potentially problematic movies afterwards. Of course KDM Nazism likely means that doing this would be impossible now.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 11-26-2019 11:14 AM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually you're still (theoretically) required to do a QC screening of the movies that you play. I rarely did that with film (unless it was a really messed up print and I wanted to test it after fixing it) but I always pre-screen the dcp's unless the key or the movie doesn't arrive in time. Which is actually a fairly rare occurrence. The last time that I had to press play and pray was one of the Hunger Games movies, so it's been a while.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 11-26-2019 12:52 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The KDM game becomes extra special when you deal with special screenings. Indie film distributors first KDM experiments... film festivals, closed group pre-screenings, etc... I've had several "press-play-to-pray" moments over the last years. [Smile]

In some cases, I'd to play the Blu-Ray version instead of the DCP... In many cases, I'd already created a backup DCP, but I remember one case where someone actually got out to the shop to buy the actual Blu-Ray... To be fair, we had a broken hard disk then, not a KDM problem.

quote: Leo Enticknap
Your priority has to be your customers, surely. If the presence of a given movie in your building puts your customers at risk of violent assault, then IMHO it's a no brainer to keep it out. Cinema staff are not law enforcement officers.
Sure, the safety of your customers is always top priority, but when did you last hear about a potential problem with playing some high-violence action flick and Disney's latest family movie in the same multiplex? Isn't the entire idea of a multiplex that I do have a broad choice of movies to go to?

You know, when Manchester United plays against Galatasaray, it's probably best not to have the Frozen Musical playing in the theater across the street from the stadium at the same time, but you can easily base that judgement on a broad, well documented history of international hooliganism... But like you mentioned yourself, you can't remember anything similar ever happening at a movie theater.

quote: Leo Enticknap
More problematic are those films that were badly or dishonestly marketed, giving potential viewers a misleading impression of what was in them. The example that sticks in my mind most of all was Wilde - the posters and trailers gave the impression that it was a Merchant & Ivory-style heritage costume pic, of the sort that goes down well with the 65-plus crowd.
Well, yes... I agree, mostly. Those "bait & switch" movies usually have the tendency to anger your crowd. "That was an ingenious twist" is something you'll probably never hear...

Still, regarding that particular movie, if it would've been a scene between a woman and a man doing the [sex] , I guess almost nobody would've stormed out of the auditorium back then and asked for their money back. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Androes
Film Handler

Posts: 34
From: seattle, washington, united states
Registered: Aug 2015


 - posted 11-26-2019 12:58 PM      Profile for Tim Androes   Email Tim Androes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Two movies that incited issues that come to mind are The Warriors (1979) and Poetic Justice (1993).

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-27-2019 12:14 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Cox
Actually you're still (theoretically) required to do a QC screening of the movies that you play.
Frank, is that a contractual thing or just good operating practice?

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 11-27-2019 04:53 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There used to be a paper included in the box along with the CRU drive. It was a form to fill out. "I have done a QC screening of this feature. Signature. Print name of projectionist. Date. Time" You were expected to fill that out and fax it back to Technicolor, so the whole thing looked pretty mandatory to me.

That form stopped being sent out some time ago, so now as far as I know you're not required to do a QC screening but it's still encouraged as a good practice.

I do a qc screening of all of my movies but I get the impression that I'm now in a minority. Which is unfortunate.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 11-27-2019 05:43 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To clarify, before the Wilde debacle, I (or one of my co-workers) would always do a QC screening ahead of the first public show, if the print arrived in time. It usually did for mainstream Hollywood titles, but often didn't for foreign/arthouse prints crossing over directly from another cinema. Annoyingly, it was those prints that were usually the problematic ones. However, after Wilde, it wasn't just a projectionist who previewed the print, but everyone who would be working front-of-house on the opening day, as well. Before then, managers, box office staff and ushers only went to the midnight or early morning QC screenings if they were working the that day anyways and were interested in the film.

The thinking was that if the person who sells you the tickets has actually seen the movie themselves, they will be able to give a better informed answer if a customer asks if there is any, shall we say, challenging material in it, etc. etc. Another one I remember from those days was Intimate Relations, which shocked a few customers with its incest theme. But this was a real arthouse film that didn't attract anything like the same crowds as Wilde, so the number of complaints was proportionately lower. It was the same problem, though - no clue in the trailers or posters as to what the movie actually dealt with.

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 11-28-2019 04:22 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
uh, the title might be a clue...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.