Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Source for Hi- Rez Movie Poster artwork. (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Source for Hi- Rez Movie Poster artwork.
James Waite
Film Handler

Posts: 52
From: London ON Canada
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 11-05-2013 04:29 PM      Profile for James Waite   Author's Homepage   Email James Waite   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We make our own poster each week to go up around campus. The artwork easily found on most websites is usually 300 DPI which looks okay but can look fuzzy when printed.

Does anyone know of a reliable place to get artwork in higher resolution?

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 11-05-2013 09:16 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The highest resolution I have ever found online consistently is MoviePosterDB.com. It is a pay site in that you will need to buy credits and each download will cost you credits. You can buy 100 credits for 5.00 euro, and most downloads are 2 credits.
MoviePosterDB.com

Just out of curiosity, what size are you printing? Are you trying to print at the full one-sheet size of 27"x40"? If you're trying to print smaller than 27" x 40", you can scale down to achieve a higher resolution. For example, 27" x 40" at 300 dpi would be the same as 13.5" x 20" at 600 dpi.

Obviously this won't matter if the original image/scan wasn't high enough resolution to capture all of the detail.

I'm guessing that if you're prints are looking fuzzy, you're taking a smaller image and making it larger. For example, I downloaded a one-sheet for Gravity from the above site and it is 3386x5000 pixels - which equals 250 dpi at 13.5" x 20". But if you were to stretch that up to 27" x 40", it would be a 125 dpi image. But at 250 dpi, it's probably going to look pretty good, depending on the printer you're using.

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 11-06-2013 06:10 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In germany, all distributors operate press sites for trailers, set-photos, and other PR related stuff. As a cinema, you can apply for login to use that material for your own advertizing.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Barry Floyd
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1079
From: Lebanon, Tennessee, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 11-06-2013 08:09 AM      Profile for Barry Floyd   Author's Homepage   Email Barry Floyd   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I get all of our poster artwork for our website at www.impawards.com

Most of the time they will have both a standard resolution and a higher resolution of each poster available.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank B. McLaughlin
Film Handler

Posts: 76
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Dec 2011


 - posted 11-06-2013 08:44 AM      Profile for Frank B. McLaughlin   Author's Homepage   Email Frank B. McLaughlin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would think that with the resolution of these posters one might convert one sheet displays to electronic devices.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-06-2013 10:05 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some places are already using electronic one sheet displays. I'm sure the day is coming when printed one sheets will be a thing of the past and all of exhibition will have to spend thousands of dollars to digitize their display cases… and the studios will pay for the big cinemas to convert.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-06-2013 12:02 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the movie studios actually intend to distribute electronic versions of movie posters and allow theaters to make prints from those files they ought to be sending PDF files rather than dopey JPEG images. Of course, I don't think the studios want any end users making prints in the first place.

Even if you had a 27" X 41" one sheet image with a native 300ppi resolution (which would come out to 8100 X 12300 pixels) the type, logos, etc. in the image would still look soft when printed. In high quality print production elements like type, vector-based logos, etc. are rendered at resolutions beyond 2000ppi.

The PDF format can contain pixel-based and vector-based artwork. PDF/X is used in professional pre-press. A 27" X 41" one sheet in PDF could feature all the credits, 3D format logos, sound format logos, etc. all in vector form. They would print razor sharp no matter low large or small the poster was scaled. One would have more control over how the photographic imagery was embedded. And it wouldn't necessarily need to be 300ppi. I think 300ppi is overkill for photographic content on a movie poster (levels of 233ppi or 200ppi would be enough for continouous tone methods and 150ppi would be sufficient for any halftone process). Essentially the file wouldn't have to be so bloated.

Another issue is how those poster images would be used. A flattened one sheet image in JPEG isn't going to be very flexible. It's not like you can scale or reposition any of the many elements in the image to fit different sizes or shapes of displays -like re-purposing that vertical one sheet image to fit the long horizontal opening of an auditorium label sign.

quote: Mike Blakesley
I'm sure the day is coming when printed one sheets will be a thing of the past and all of exhibition will have to spend thousands of dollars to digitize their display cases… and the studios will pay for the big cinemas to convert.
I'm a little skeptical about that. On one hand, LED-based displays are growing more common at ticket booths and for overhead auditorium label signs. I can certainly see them replacing all the little horizontal "mylar" signs.

HDTV monitors can be rotated into "portrait" orientation. Their 16:9 aspect ratio isn't all that different from the 1.52:1 aspect ratio of a 27" X 41" one sheet. There are numerous multimedia kiosk systems available that can drive images and video to multiple HD displays. Still, there is the matter of cost. Lighted one sheet cases cost less than HD monitors in a kiosk system. Theater customers are very accustomed to seeing the printed one sheets. So I don't know if a theater would actually gain anything by shifting to an electronic display of a poster versus a much sharper, printed version.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Orsak
Film Handler

Posts: 45
From: Hallettsville, TX USA
Registered: Sep 2007


 - posted 11-06-2013 01:05 PM      Profile for Richard Orsak   Email Richard Orsak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What companies are offering "electronic" displays for posters or multimedia trailer content to be displayed on a monitor? I believe at one chain I saw the poster being displayed on a monitor, and the trailer playing on the bottom?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-06-2013 01:40 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
Theater customers are very accustomed to seeing the printed one sheets. So I don't know if a theater would actually gain anything by shifting to an electronic display of a poster versus a much sharper, printed version.
Are you kidding? Even just having a single screen, I can think of a lot of great possibilities it would open up for us:

- Ability to change out posters instantly
- Ability to display different posters at different times of day
- Ability to use display "cases" for other than movie information if necessary
- Not having to keep a closet full of posters
- Not having a ton of old posters to throw away
- Posters would always look great, as opposed to the way they look when one flourescent bulb gets burned out, or when they get faded in outside cases
- All posters would be lit
- Ability to program a display to cycle between various different posters
- Not having to bother with ordering posters (assuming they would be delivered via a TrailMix-like service)
- Not having to worry about poster availability

While I love a good-looking printed one-sheet as much as anyone, I really don't think the average movie poster observer gives two hoots if a poster is printed on a sheet of paper or not. Some adjustments might be required to make the credit-block at the bottom readable, but I don't see any other big problems outside of the cost of all those monitors and the related connectivity...two things that are dropping fast.

I think it'll happen eventually. Our booker told me the same thing. Just the amount of printing, paper and shipping cost that would be saved over the long haul is enough to convince the pencil pushers at the studios to go for it.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Ribbens
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 118
From: Los Angeles
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 11-06-2013 01:52 PM      Profile for Scott Ribbens   Email Scott Ribbens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Richard Orsak
What companies are offering "electronic" displays for posters or multimedia trailer content to be displayed on a monitor? I believe at one chain I saw the poster being displayed on a monitor, and the trailer playing on the bottom?

That was most likely "TrailerVision" From Cinema Scene: http://www.cinemascenemarketing.com/

Did the display look something like this? (First picture on the left): http://www.cinemascenemarketing.com/media/

More info: http://www.cinemascenemarketing.com/media/media/trailervision-digital.html

(No, I do not work for them. [Big Grin] )

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 11-07-2013 02:25 AM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You don't need to use a subscription service for displaying digital content. Many TVs now have USB ports and can be set to play the USB files as a slide show. Otherwise you can use a mediatank device, like a Popcorn Hour box, to play over HDMI to a TV. And it doesn't take a huge amount of programming knowledge to create a system which will run box office and auditorium signs - and the programming and server tools are free (PHP, MySQL, Apache, etc).

You can even download HD trailers from YouTube for use in a lobby display.

When you start adding up what you're paying for things like auditorium and box office signs, these digital systems can pay for themselves within a couple years. You could even use these options for snack bar menus to eliminate the need for menu strips.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-07-2013 12:44 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
While I love a good-looking printed one-sheet as much as anyone, I really don't think the average movie poster observer gives two hoots if a poster is printed on a sheet of paper or not.
Lots of people still like big photo prints as opposed to merely looking at photos on a computer screen or TV screen. If they were happy looking at only electronic versions of photos we wouldn't need any cameras that recorded more than a couple million pixels.

The trade-offs are pretty noticeable from a printed poster to a reduced resolution version shown on a rotated 1080p monitor. You're right about the credits at the bottom. Those thin, ultra condensed typefaces commonly used on one sheets can get pretty faint or fuzzy when reduced to fit the pixel count of a computer screen or TV screen. Small logos in the credits block can end up looking like illegible clumps of pixels.

I've dealt with similar issues in billboard ads. Billboards in high traffic locations are going electronic simply because the images can be changed every 8 seconds or so and bring in more income. But there's a huge tradeoff in resolution. You can't show anywhere near the level of detail on a LED billboard that you can on a static printed billboard. Color control is even an issue (lots of subtle highlight and shadow details can get blown out or crushed on a LED display if brightness isn't properly adjusted).

quote: Justin Hamaker
You don't need to use a subscription service for displaying digital content. Many TVs now have USB ports and can be set to play the USB files as a slide show.
This is true, but most people don't have the resources needed (time, talent, creative software, technical know how) to create their own content for a HDTV monitor, particularly one rotated into vertical orientation to use as a electronic poster case. A turn-key "kiosk" system of networked monitors, a multimedia playback server and supply legally acquired/licensed content removes all the end user work that would be required in a "DIY" setup.

quote: Justin Hamaker
When you start adding up what you're paying for things like auditorium and box office signs, these digital systems can pay for themselves within a couple years. You could even use these options for snack bar menus to eliminate the need for menu strips.
Electronic signs aren't cost free. Hardware can and does malfunction or break. It takes time/money to create the content for the electronic displays.

I have seen a few fast food restaurants install a wall of flat panel monitors and use them to display the food menu along with other animated/video content. The tricky thing is the system and content playing on the system has to be carefully designed. All of the content on those fast food restaurant menus is being generated by the company's advertising department or the ad agency working for them. That stuff isn't getting created on the individual restaurant level. The local guys don't have access to all the creative "assets" (product photos, graphics objects, logos, unique fonts, brand guidelines, etc.) to be able to do the job right even if one of the employees had a good computer and Adobe Creative Cloud subscription.

And that's really where I see a big problem with trying to use a flat screen TV to replace the printed mylar strip signs that slide into auditorium entry signs or changeable slots in the box office. I only see text-based LED signs replacing those things at a lot of theaters, not TV screens.

In a DIY situation where is the end user going to get the individual assets to create the proper sign for the TV screen? He can't just use a flat JPEG of the movie poster one sheet. I strongly doubt any movie studio or production company would give just anyone full access to the individual assets it has for promoting a movie. Studio marketing departments are pretty anal retentive when it comes to consistency of branding in a movie's promotion. They have all kinds of rules on how things are supposed to look in order to make ads uniformly consistent in every type of advertising medium. Out of would-be amateur graphic designers many don't get that or give a damn about it. Hence, they're not to be trusted in making their own home-brewed ads of the movie.

Every once in awhile I'll look at movie poster art on Google Images. I'm usually looking for some kind of detail, like if any movie posters have a Dolby Atmos logo on them (very few do). Some movies will have a fair amount of fan generated poster art. It's usually pretty easy to tell the difference between the fan generated art versus the stuff that came from the studio.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 11-07-2013 04:34 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bobby Henderson
I have seen a few fast food restaurants install a wall of flat panel monitors and use them to display the food menu along with other animated/video content.
And that is a huge gripe I have with the fast food industry. These stupid moving, changing, circulating menu boards, combined with the 47 "combos" that they all seem to be pushing now, have made ordering way too complicated. JUST LIST THE FREAKING PRODUCTS, ALL RIGHT? I'LL ORDER WHAT I WANT!

ME: I'd like a 3-piece chicken dinner, original recipe.
Kid: If you order the #8 combo it comes with 2 sides, or the #16 combo comes with a side and a drink, or you could get the #39 combo, that comes with an extra piece of chicken of your choice plus dessert, and a drink is a quarter extra for all of them except #16, which already includes a drink.

OK rant over, back to griping about movie posters. I've quite often had to print a onesheet myself when a "real" one wasn't available. My printer does 13x19 sheets. Nobody has ever come in saying "Man, I sure wish you had a full-sized one-sheet...the resolution on that one sucks!

I think the biggest job of a one-sheet is to inform the passerby what the movie is like, not dazzle them with its quality of print.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 11-07-2013 07:55 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
And that is a huge gripe I have with the fast food industry. These stupid moving, changing, circulating menu boards, combined with the 47 "combos" that they all seem to be pushing now, have made ordering way too complicated. JUST LIST THE FREAKING PRODUCTS, ALL RIGHT? I'LL ORDER WHAT I WANT!
I also especially hate those TFT panels with rotating menu items... No matter where, at a movie theater, fast food restaurant. It's totally fine that you put some animated content in there, but keep options and price info steady and do not shuffle them around while I'm reading them...

Regarding movie posters... I would really love to see some improvements in E-ink technology: better colors, bright white background and bigger surfaces. Also, E-ink displays should be cheaper to produce than big LCD/TFT/Plasma screens and do only require a minimal amount of power. I've already seen E-ink based price tags at local supermarkets and retailers. They're programmed using some kind of RFID programmer and do not require any power to retain the information on screen.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 11-08-2013 11:48 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
And that is a huge gripe I have with the fast food industry. These stupid moving, changing, circulating menu boards, combined with the 47 "combos" that they all seem to be pushing now, have made ordering way too complicated. JUST LIST THE FREAKING PRODUCTS, ALL RIGHT? I'LL ORDER WHAT I WANT!
That could be one reason why In N Out Burger has become so popular (aside from the fact its burgers taste great and are priced very competitively). The In N Out menu is very simple and old fashioned in appearance. The burger chain has a "secret menu" for its fan base (basically it's just different ways to customize burgers, fries and shakes sold there).

Animated content is the norm for any flat panel TV set trying to act like a sign. Why spend all that extra money on a video monitor if it's only going to be used to show static imagery? A standard sign cabinet internally lit with fluorescent lamps or white LEDs is going to be a lot cheaper to buy, operate, maintain and replace.

An independent theater operator, especially one who has any staff members that know how to use graphics and video editing software, can use flat panel HDTV monitors however he likes. But if theater chains adopt HDTV monitors as replacements for movie poster cases it's a guarantee they would be showing a lot more than mere, static posters. They would be showing a lot of stuff instead of movie posters.

I can image a theater multiplex box office featuring all its movie titles and show times displayed on a wall of flat panel HDTV monitors. I also foresee much, if not all, of that video wall being consumed by movie trailers, food ads and other stuff. It would turn into a chore for customers to see what time a certain movie is playing and in what projection/sound format. They would have to wait for all the other animated crap to finish so they could get another glipse of the show times. I suppose the box office person could suggest customers download their smart phone app to check show times and even buy tickets. With so much of the ticket purchasing going online I wouldn't be surprised to see box offices disappear from movie theaters. Just show up at the door, insert the credit/debit card that was used to order tickets online into a kiosk machine, the tickets spit out automatically.

There's lots of signs that are meant only to be static. Brand equity is built best by keeping that brand visible 100% of the time, be it a business name or movie title. I don't see retail businesses replacing their signs with color LED boards and only flashing their brand name once in awhile between other ads. The brand stays visible and they install an LED board under the sign.

quote: Marcel Birgelen
Regarding movie posters... I would really love to see some improvements in E-ink technology: better colors, bright white background and bigger surfaces.
E-ink technology still has a ways to go before it can take off in popularity. If costs of OLED production could ever come down from the stratosphere it might have a better shot since OLED displays can be backlit and produce very vibrant colors and contrast while maintaining a very thin form factor.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.