Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » 3D Showtimes for Gravity

   
Author Topic: 3D Showtimes for Gravity
Michael Kurtzke
Film Handler

Posts: 45
From: Ashburn, VA, USA
Registered: Feb 2013


 - posted 09-22-2013 06:31 PM      Profile for Michael Kurtzke   Email Michael Kurtzke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just got this e-mail sent to me from my booker:

quote:
GRAVITY - WB 3D/2D Policy Guidelines:

If you are showing one print WB recommends 1 matinee or twilight show in 2D and the rest in 3D

Where you have two prints WB recommends 1 matinee or twilight show and 1 evening show in 2D

Where an exhibitor has 3 prints WB recommends all but 1 evening show on one print to play in 2D with the other 2 prints playing exclusively in 3D.

I feel like the only way I could do a full run in 2D is if I got a 35mm print!

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-22-2013 06:43 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Based on the 3-D trailer I had seen many times in RealD and IMAX, 3-D is the only way I intend to see this movie. GRAVITY was shot in native 3-D and not post converted like almost all the recent films have been.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Kurtzke
Film Handler

Posts: 45
From: Ashburn, VA, USA
Registered: Feb 2013


 - posted 09-22-2013 08:05 PM      Profile for Michael Kurtzke   Email Michael Kurtzke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's nice to hear that it was actually shot in 3D! It's a nice change of pace from a lot of the other '3D' movies that came out this past year.

I just feel like limiting your 2D showtimes to one or two [We are getting two prints] is odd. Especially since it's only 90 mins, we could easily do six shows a day per print. That would round out to be 10 3D showtimes and two 2D showtimes.

The major problem I have with 3D is that I have Sony Projectors *Shudders*. Their 3D lenses are HORRIBLE! I've got a Sony R-515 on a 35ft silver screen and two Sony R-320's on 42ft silver screens. With the maximum light output of the 515 [w/3D lens] of 1350 watts on a 35ft 3D screen, It's amazingly dim. Also 2.1kW on 42 ft screens isn't much better.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 09-22-2013 09:29 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From the reviews I've heard so far, it seems like Gravity is a movie where 3D really enhances the movie. I'll reserve judgment until I've seen it, but this does happen on occasion.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-23-2013 12:35 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Michael, the key word is recommends.

 |  IP: Logged

Shawn M. Martin
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 175
From: Arlington, VA, USA
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 09-23-2013 10:30 AM      Profile for Shawn M. Martin     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This actually was post converted.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-23-2013 10:54 AM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I stand corrected on GRAVITY being shot in native 3-D. Based on how fantastic the 3-D looked in the film's trailer, I just assumed it was shot in the native process. After checking my source, I learned GRAVITY was indeed post converted. Despite the fact that the movie will be in post converted 3-D, that is the way I intend to see it.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-23-2013 11:27 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This movie is probably going to be in that category where the 3D really adds to the experience. I hope it's a big hit. Recommendations or not though I think we'll probably just stick to the same 3D/2D schedule we have been, now that people are used to it.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 09-24-2013 03:40 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With all the CGI in the average movie nowadays and especially in Sci-Fi movies, does it really matter if it was "filmed in 3D" or post-converted?

Look at Avatar for example, anyone boasting that this flick was shot in 3D and therefore looks superior is obviously joking or doesn't have a clue, about 95% of that movie comes right off a huge 3D render-street.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-06-2013 05:48 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Also, TITANIC's 3Difying proves that if it's done well it can be awesome.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 10-06-2013 07:07 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The 3-D post production of JURASSIC PARK was also fantastic especially in IMAX.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew Thomas
Master Film Handler

Posts: 273
From: Pearland, TX, USA
Registered: Jun 2012


 - posted 10-07-2013 10:49 AM      Profile for Andrew Thomas   Email Andrew Thomas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The vast majority of Gravity is CG. Pretty much the only thing not CG were the actors faces. To refer to it as "post converted" 3D is pretty silly.

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 10-07-2013 11:10 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm pretty 'neutral' when it comes to 3D.
But I saw this flick back in August, and it's one of the few films
I've actually recommending my friends see in 3D & not 2D.
(Friends tell me the IMAX version is good too)

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-07-2013 02:03 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I watched Gravity in 2D on a really large screen (one of Harkins Theaters' "Cine Capris" screens), but with Dolby Atmos sound. 3D and Atmos would have been a great combination, but no theater in Oklahoma offers that. Atmos blows away what IMAX can do with its goofy "laser aligned" sound systems. The Gravity mix in Atmos is one of the best surround mixes I've ever heard. I think it tops any list for aggressive use of dialog in the surround field.

I'd like to see Gravity again. If I watch it again in a theater I might see it in 3D.

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 10-07-2013 05:21 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Both of Honolulu's large screen theatres , Regal's Dole Cannery with their IMAX and Consolidated's Ward 16 with Tittan XC and Dolby Atmos has scheduled all of their shows in 3-D. Hooray! On top of that they have two separate smaller theatres showing the movie on a continuous basis in both 3-D and 2-D

I am planning to see the movie tomorrow at the Dole Cannery in IMAX 3-D because all of the favorable revues have praised the format's presentation. unlike Bobby, I like IMAX sound. and although Dolby Atmos might have a better mix, I do not like the Ward' with their stupid reserve seating where they tell you where to sit. They did this the last time when they made me sit directly next to a couple in seats off to the side when they were plenty of great vacant seats in the auditorium .The Ward's 3-D is Dolby and I personally prefer RealD and IMAX 3-D.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.