Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » 20th Century Fox enters the 21st Century (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: 20th Century Fox enters the 21st Century
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-22-2013 02:03 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is actually kind-of old news but I don't see it anywhere on F-T...

...but, before you get too excited...

...Note the final paragraph (Update!)

Fox Announces Name Change

quote:
News Corp Announces Another New Overall Name - 21st Century Fox
by Alex Billington
April 16, 2013
Source: Deadline

It's time to take things into the 21st Century. I was wondering when this would happen! It has been revealed in an official internal email written by News Corporation owner Rupert Murdoch that movie studio 20th Century Fox will finally get an updated name change to 21st Century Fox. This will properly represent the fact that we now live in the 21st century, even though Fox was originally founded in 1935 by the merger of Fox Films and 20th Century Pictures, Inc. during the 20th Century. We expect a formal announcement at CinemaCon this week, along with a new logo (the one above is a CG creation) but this is big industry news.

One of the wealthiest persons on this planet, News Corp owner Rupert Murdoch, wrote a lengthy email to the staff of News Corporation this week announcing the new name. The full memo (detailing their history) can be read on Deadline, but we've included a few of the better excerpts below regrading the name change.

It's with great enthusiasm that I share with you today's news that we've chosen a new name for the media and entertainment company that will be formed as part of the proposed separation of News Corporation.

After much exploration, and valuable input from our executive team, we've chosen the name 21st Century Fox to take us into the future. 21st Century Fox is a name that draws upon the rich creative heritage of Twentieth Century Fox, while also speaking to the innovation and dynamism that must define each of our businesses through the 21st Century. Our new name is inspired by the very first company we acquired nearly thirty years ago as our initial foray into the awe-inspiring world of entertainment.

Together, as 21st Century Fox, we have the creative magic, innovation and global footprint required to wow consumers around the world — every day. We haven't forgotten our roots in the entertainment world, and the legacy we inherited and built will guide us as we drive forward towards what is undoubtedly a future of even greater heights throughout this 21st Century and beyond. I can't wait to get started.


While the name "20th Century Fox" and the logo that accompanies it (and the music!) are very iconic, I've been wondering if they would ever update that name to be more current considering we entered the "21st Century" thirteen years ago. Now it's finally time, and Murdoch has decided to roll up the name change with his "proposed separation of News Corporation". For moviegoers, that doesn't mean much besides that he's retitling everything in film/TV to 21st Century Fox, similar to the way the company exists now (producing and distributing movies and TV content), but now they're ready "to take us into the future." Is this a big response to my claim that "Hollywood is behind the times"? Either way, it's very interesting news to report.

Update! There is an important quote in Murdoch's memo regarding names that states: "Both studios [TV & film] will maintain the name Twentieth Century Fox in recognition of their rich histories and strong connections with audiences across the globe." So, the movie studio itself is not being retitled, but the entire division of News Corp where the film & TV divisions are, will exist under the bigger name "21st Century Fox". This seems like it's making things a lot more confusing than helping, but that's what his memo states.

From Deadline -- No Name Change for 20th Century-Fox

quote:
No Name Change For 20th Century Fox
By NIKKI FINKE, Editor in Chief | Tuesday April 16, 2013 @ 3:26pm PDT

Forget that News Corp is renaming its new separate media and entertainment business 21st Century Fox to take it into the future. 20th Century Fox is sticking to its past. ”The film studio is not changing names or logo,” a 20th Century Fox movie exec tells me today. Another tells me that the TV studios also are keeping the 20th Century Fox name. Why? Because the studios studied the situation and discovered that the name is one of the most recognizable in the world and has “real value” and “positive association” to the public, particularly overseas. (I hear that’s why the parent company is leveraging that name.) “It’s an 80-year-old brand that stands for something and means something to people,” the studio decided. Executives tell me the studio would have changed its moniker at the millennium. “But it’s long since lost the connection to the century. It’s a brand. It’s something that has lasted. The other company is brand new and begins in the 21st century.” I’m told that Rupert Murdoch and his Big Media corporation had “no issue” with 20th Century Fox retaining its name. I personally think that the film/TV studios simply didn’t want to pay to change all that perfectly good letterhead stationery. Meanwhile, Futurama keeps calling the studio ’30th Century Fox’.


 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 07-22-2013 02:32 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This would have been so stupid and killed their brand.

Glad to see them sticking around the 20th century.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 07-22-2013 03:12 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There was already a 21st Century film company. IIRC it was headed up by Menachem Golan, half of the Golan-Globus team that headed up Canon Films -famous for churning out a lot of B-movie fare and killing the Christopher Reeve version of the Superman franchise.

If 20th Century Fox was going to change names, they should have transitioned to "Fox Films" or something like that before the turn of the century. With it being 2013, they're a little over 13 years late on making a change. Good or bad, I think it's best they stick with the "20th" thing in their brand. Besides, it would look too weird to see inconsistency in the brand between catalog titles like Die Hard and Star Wars versus newer movies coming out with a "21st" variant of the brand.

 |  IP: Logged

Jock Blakley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 218
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Oct 2011


 - posted 07-22-2013 07:39 PM      Profile for Jock Blakley   Email Jock Blakley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
They could stick the dash back in and go back to Twentieth Century-
Fox Film Corporation.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 07-22-2013 09:02 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I vaguely remember seeing some movies around the turn of the century that said "Fox 2000 Pictures". I think the fanfare and spotlight thing was the same as usual, but the text afterward said "Fox 2000 Pictures Presents"

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-24-2013 04:50 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I remember an old Buggs Bunny cartoon in which the studio was named 20th century SOX. Someone asked Buggs what happens in the year 2000? Buggs respons "they change their sox". That is a lot better than what that putz Murdach came up with, not to mention 13 years TOO LATE.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 07-24-2013 05:03 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When I first see the 20th Century Fox logo, my first thought is still "Star Wars". In my mind those two are forever linked.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 07-24-2013 05:19 PM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it's the most iconic and enduring of all the old logos. Neat if you think about the fact that most of these studios are or are turning 100. Something warm and fuzzy about it hitting my movie geek nerve.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Claude S. Ayakawa
Film God

Posts: 2738
From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 07-24-2013 06:16 PM      Profile for Claude S. Ayakawa   Author's Homepage   Email Claude S. Ayakawa   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Of all the studio logos and fanfares, 20th Century Fox has always been my favorite especially with the CinemaScope extension.

-Claude

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-24-2013 06:23 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'll forever associate it with The Cannonball Run

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 07-24-2013 06:27 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
21st Century Fox is just the new name of News Corporation minus the publishing business, which is now called "News Corp". It sure is one confusing mess...

The later one is slowly going down the drain (Free News on the Internet and the media scandals in the UK are doing their part) so it's been isolated from the stuff that still has a future.

 |  IP: Logged

Jock Blakley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 218
From: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Registered: Oct 2011


 - posted 07-25-2013 02:00 AM      Profile for Jock Blakley   Email Jock Blakley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Claude S. Ayakawa
Of all the studio logos and fanfares, 20th Century Fox has always been my favorite especially with the CinemaScope extension.
One of these days they might even send it out at the same level as the feature, rather than at about one-third as loud.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-25-2013 02:42 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree. Many of the studio logos are too soft. Universal's needs more bass, I think. But Fox is the weakest. Too bad because it's the coolest.

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 07-26-2013 03:11 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, the Fox Fanfare tune is weak on a lot of newer movies. It sure wasn't weak on the front of Die Hard. It kicked it hard for that movie.
[thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 07-26-2013 03:32 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I really don't get it. These outfits are in the business of visual effects and sound but they don't apply that to their intros.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.