Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Zack and Miri pulled from Utah theatres (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Zack and Miri pulled from Utah theatres
Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 10-31-2008 08:21 AM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Zack and Miri get the can in Utah
quote:
If you're looking forward to seeing Seth Rogen and Elizabeth Banks in director Kevin Smith's new R-rated comedy "Zack and Miri Make a Porno" this weekend and you live in Salt Lake City, you might be out of luck. Utah Jazz and Megaplex Theaters owner Larry Miller has refused to book the film. The chain's spokesman Cal Gunderson expressed concerns about the film with The New York Post, citing the film's "graphic nudity and graphic sex" and that it was "too close to an NC-17."
The company's standards seem a little odd considering that the chain had no problems screening ultra-violent fare like "Saw V," which features beheadings and explicit self-mutilation. When asked why Megaplex Theaters did not object to the gory horror sequel, Gunderson had no comment.
Furthermore, the company's decision might make sense if "Zack and Miri Make a Porno" were in fact pornographic. Instead, Kevin Smith's surprisingly tame and sentimental movie has a few flashes of nudity, a handful of love scenes played mostly for laughs, and a whole lot of foul language. In fact, the film's raunchiness level is comparable to that of "The 40-Year-Old Virgin", "Knocked Up" and "Sex Drive," all of which screened at Megaplex theaters.
It has been a difficult road for Kevin Smith's film, but it is not the first time he has encountered resistance to his frank and bawdy sense of humor. His first film "Clerks" was originally rated NC-17 for language, and his religious comedy "Dogma" sparked protests from Catholic groups. For "Zack and Miri," he again was forced to appeal an NC-17 rating with the MPAA, a teaser trailer had to be removed from his website, and the battle over the poster resulted in a design where the stars only appear as stick figures.
So what's the problem with this movie? The word "Porno" in the title. Aside from Larry Miller's theater chain, fifteen newspapers along with several TV stations and billboard owners have been refusing to promote the flick across the country because of that word. As Philadelphia deputy mayor Rina Cutler said in a phone interview with The Wall Street Journal, "If they want to call the movie 'Zack and Miri,' that's fine, but Zack and Miri cannot make a porno on my bus shelters."
This isn't the first time Miller's company caused controversy by banning a movie. In early 2006, Miller pulled Oscar-nominated movie "Brokeback Mountain" from the screens when he learned that the film was a gay love story between two cowboys. He later stated that he regretted that decision.
As a footnote to this story, this past weekend an audience full of children and pre-teens expecting to see the G-rated "High School Musical 3" at one of Miller's theaters in South Jordan, UT were surprised when the beginning of the R-rated "Sex Drive," which features nudity and swearing, was shown accidentally. But at least they didn't see Seth Rogen in his underwear.
"Zack and Miri Make a Porno" opens everywhere (almost) on Friday.


I personally like how this idiot says that he later regretted not playing "Brokeback Mountain". He only said this because of how huge of a hit it was. These are the type of people I would love to shoot, but then again thats just me.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-31-2008 09:08 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has he even watched the film?

Also, the article confuses the "banning" of the film (which is not happening) with the fact that the theatre owner simply chose not to book it (which is what happened). He probably didn't choose to book "Birth of a Nation" this week, either, but that doesn't mean that it has been banned.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 10-31-2008 09:20 AM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Has anyone even watched the film?
Obviously Kurt has [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-31-2008 09:27 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw a lot of this movie last night and it should be pulled for being boring rather than any nudity or sex... which really isn't that graphic. There is a bit of full frontal, but I wouldn't say it is excessive or anything. There are a bunch of shots of fake boobies, but fake/augmented boobies are wholly un-erotic.

It is not surprising that Utah has banned this. They are Utah, after all... a completely worthless state. Things like porn are scary to the primitive people who live there.

 |  IP: Logged

Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 10-31-2008 09:28 AM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well the first thing they do is state that they are not booking it. He really is banning the film from his theatres by not booking it.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Enos
Film God

Posts: 2081
From: Richmond, Virginia, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 10-31-2008 09:46 AM      Profile for Bill Enos   Email Bill Enos   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe the title is too long for the marquee.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 10-31-2008 09:58 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Years ago; the preachers wanted "Best Little Whorehouse" banned based on the word that is up on the marquee. WHORE and PORNO both have 5 letters!

Perhaps that is the connection!! Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 10-31-2008 10:01 AM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Slow news day or what?

quote: Joe Redifer
It is not surprising that Utah has banned this. They are Utah, after all... a completely worthless state. Things like porn are scary to the primitive people who live there.

I don't even know where to begin. [Roll Eyes]

For those who live in the areas served by Larry H. Miller's theatres, here's a quick list of places where you can see this movie today.

AMC Loews Layton Hills 9
Cinemark Tinseltown, Layton
5 Star Cinemas, Magna
Broadway Center Theatre, Salt Lake City
Carmike 12, West Jordan
Century 16, Salt Lake City
Century 16, Sandy Union Heights
Cinemark 24, West Jordan
Redstone 8 Cinemas, Park City
Carmike Wynnsong 12, Provo
Cinemark 12, American Fork
Cinemark 16, Provo
Cinemark Tinseltown 14, Ogden

So, for all those poeple who want to see an ugly guy and a dumb girl "make a porno," buen provecho.

[sleep]

 |  IP: Logged

Galen Murphy-Fahlgren
Master Film Handler

Posts: 405
From: Canton, MI, USA
Registered: Oct 2007


 - posted 10-31-2008 10:19 AM      Profile for Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Email Galen Murphy-Fahlgren   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If I did bookings, I would get this movie just for the grand potential for marquees when it goes to a split screen after the second week. Reminds me of when we split The Strangers and Sex and the City at my old theater...

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 10-31-2008 02:33 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree, Scott. Nothing is being banned.

When did people gain the right to see a movie at the theatre down the street again? I thought private businesses could still decide what products they wanted to offer. I guess I should want to shoot the bar owner near my house since he doesn't have High Life on tap.

 |  IP: Logged

Kurt Zupin
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 989
From: Maricopa, Arizona
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 10-31-2008 11:06 PM      Profile for Kurt Zupin   Email Kurt Zupin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Its not being banned in Utah, but it is being banned in Larry Millers theatres. Of course the guy/girl who wrote the article is going to make it sound like its being banned in all of Utah. Story sells better when you say Utah then "In Megaplex theatres"

quote: Greg Anderson
So, for all those poeple who want to see an ugly guy and a dumb girl "make a porno," buen provecho.

Where to begin?! [Razz]

This is a romantic comedy, there is nothing wrong with this movie at all. I would say that there are scenes in Striptease that are almost as bad as some of the scenes in this. Greg if you don't want to see it then by all means you do not have to check it out [puke] Last time I checked seeing a naked woman didn't turn Bundy into a killer!

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Schindler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1039
From: Oak Park, IL, USA
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 10-31-2008 11:55 PM      Profile for Mike Schindler   Email Mike Schindler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Greg Anderson
So, for all those poeple who want to see an ugly guy and a dumb girl "make a porno," buen provecho.
Actually, Elizabeth Banks is quite smart. She graduated magna cum laude from the University of Pennsylvania.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-01-2008 12:07 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Heh heh... "cum" laude... She was born for this movie. Actually, she is damn fine for a 40 year old.

 |  IP: Logged

Shane Cooper
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 232
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 11-01-2008 02:21 AM      Profile for Shane Cooper   Email Shane Cooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think your slightly off there...

She is fine for a 34-year-old!

Maybe you mean't the 40-Year-Old Virgin...I'm gonna put my bike in it!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 11-01-2008 02:27 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I swear the article I read in the newspaper said she was 40 (or at least 39). Oh well, that's what I get for being completely illiterate!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.