Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » "How She Move" - Does this title piss anyone else off? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: "How She Move" - Does this title piss anyone else off?
Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-11-2008 09:26 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For some reason, any time I see this stupid movie title printed anywhere, it pisses me off. I just want to ship the trailers and posters and everything else back to the studio with a message that says, "Hey, Jackasses...," (ironically yet not surprisingly, the studio is Paramount), "...you need to fix this, then send it back to me."

Now I know the studio didn't name the movie. Well maybe they did. Or maybe they had some say, or made the suggestion.

Maybe it's actually not grammatically incorrect. Maybe I'm missing something. Or maybe it's just cool to be wrong.

Maybe I'm turning into an old fart.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-11-2008 10:03 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The only titles that piss me off are ones that have the word "movie" in the title. Scary Movie, Date Movie, A Goofy Movie, etc. Movies with "Movie" in the title tend to suck.

I also don't like titles where the entire joke of the movie is in the title. Like "Balls of Fury." You knew that movie was going to suck just by reading the title.

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-11-2008 12:06 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If we do not wish to look like total trash to the rest of the world, we should at least learn to use our own language correctly. "How She Moves". Let's face it, the rest of the world already hates us for our arrogance, let's not let them think we are unbelievable stupid as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Mundell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 120
From: Silver Spring, MD, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-11-2008 12:07 PM      Profile for Tom Mundell   Author's Homepage   Email Tom Mundell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The titles that annoy me the most are the ones that for no readily apparent reason need to be advertised by their ridiculous abbreviation (like ID4 for Independence Day). But yeah, I'd agree there has to have been a better title than How She Move!

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Funderburg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 814
From: Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-11-2008 12:20 PM      Profile for Ron Funderburg   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Funderburg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since the movie is about the manner in which the girl moves her body and not the move she makes in her life the title is most certainly not grammatically correct. However, the film does have a move of location in it as well. Perhaps a better title so we can piss the most of us off would be "How She Move: Another Dumb Dance Movie".

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-11-2008 01:55 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well I know nothing about this movie but looking at the stills on imdb.com, it's quite obvious the title is, shall we say, "ebonics inspired." If they changed it to "How She Moves," it loses all hipness, edginess, and street-ness.

Remember the movie "I'm Gonna Git You Sucka?" If they'd changed it to "I'm Going to Get You, You Fool" it would have done even less business than it did.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 01-11-2008 02:12 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
but there is a point here....would you remember the title How She Moves in a few years or How She Move. Basically you will remember the How She Move title because it was so stupid in the spelling. It did it's job.

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Mehocic
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 804
From: New Castle, PA, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-11-2008 03:16 PM      Profile for Aaron Mehocic   Email Aaron Mehocic   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, I too am irritated by titles like this. I'm also irritated when the letter Z is substituted in place of the letter S, the number 4 is used in place of the word "for" (2 for "to" included), and other transgressions against the King's English.

I'm also pissed when people abbreviate phrases into acronyms such as IMHO, FWIW, LOL, and BRB.

Its texting and internet chat that makes us stupid. But what really causes me to flip out is when somebody in conversation calls my beloved state of Pennsylvania "PA" [fu] [puke]

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Funderburg
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 814
From: Chickasha, Oklahoma, USA
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-11-2008 03:26 PM      Profile for Ron Funderburg   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Funderburg   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Aaron Mehocic actually I do use the letter z in place of s often in certain words and sometimes the other way round. This is due to the fact I read what my wife writes and it rubs off she is from England by way of Australia. Which is to say she was born in England spent a good deal of youth there and migrated to Australia. For just so you understand my meaning in this country we do not use Kings English sir it is American English which is a far cry from the Kings English my wife actually does use!

Oh and she finds our use of the word color instead of colour to be a oh so silly!

 |  IP: Logged

James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006


 - posted 01-11-2008 03:28 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I may be part of the problem: I can't just muster up any indignation over grammar or spelling anymore. Some of my fellow citizens get irate over the mispronounciation of "Lubbock". That does not annoy me. (It rhymes with "Buttock", if your are curious.)

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 01-12-2008 02:11 AM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It doesn't piss me off - it's just an example of the Hip Hop idiom of American English. The title will do what it's supposed to do - reach it's target audience.

People who get angered by such things are old and mentally enfeebled and silly and need to be sent to a home. [evil]

Now back to watching my Wild in the Streets, Logan's Run, The Ballad of Narayama triple feature.

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 01-12-2008 08:58 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tom Mundell
The titles that annoy me the most are the ones that for no readily apparent reason need to be advertised by their ridiculous abbreviation (like ID4 for Independence Day).
I believe the reason that Independence Day picked up the "ID4" nickname was due to legal concerns about the title "Independence Day". The line in the "President's" speech about today is our Independence Day was put there due to the same concerns.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 01-12-2008 10:42 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Paul Mayer
People who get angered by such things are old and mentally enfeebled and silly and need to be sent to a home.
Wow, I guess that explains it.

Thanks, Paul! [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-12-2008 01:09 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Lyle Romer
I believe the reason that Independence Day picked up the "ID4" nickname was due to legal concerns about the title "Independence Day". The line in the "President's" speech about today is our Independence Day was put there due to the same concerns.
WHere do you get that information? What legal concerns? The ID4 was created just to give the picture a cool sounding nickname. We have KFC, BK and etc for the same reason.

I always thought ID4 was totally stupid because there is no "4" in the title. But I guess "ID" sounded even stupider.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 01-12-2008 02:09 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Blakesley
The only titles that piss me off are ones that have the word "movie" in the title. Scary Movie, Date Movie, A Goofy Movie, etc. Movies with "Movie" in the title tend to suck.
They should make one called "Pornographic Movie"...an actual porn flick done in the same satire style.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.