my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Christmas: Charlotte's Web v. Night at the Museum v. Pursuit of Happyness

Author Topic: Christmas: Charlotte's Web v. Night at the Museum v. Pursuit of Happyness Adam Fraser Master Film Handler Posts: 499 From: Houghton Lake, MI, USA Registered: Dec 2001 posted 11-20-2006 06:26 PM                        We are a single screen theatre with mainly a tourist base audience. We can only book one of these films for the Christmas season. Which would you choose, all three seem to be family friendly. Night at the Museum Pursuit of Happyness Charlotte's Web  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-20-2006 06:56 PM                        I have the same quandary. At first I thought, "Charlotte's Web," it's a no brainer. But "Happyness" seems to be really gathering steam too. I'm about to just flip a coin, I don't think any of the three would be a bad choice. The only thing that worries me about "Night at the Museum" is what happened with "Jumanji" and its sequel. Special effects-laden adventure films.....They both looked great in the trailers and then nobody went to them. The difference here of course is Ben Stiller. "Charlotte" has a G rating which could diminish the teen/adult crowd...but it has the name recognition factor going for it. I just don't know, and I hope you (we) get some good opinions here on what to do.  |  IP: Logged Eric Hooper Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 532 From: Fort Worth, TX, USA Registered: May 2003 posted 11-20-2006 07:06 PM                     I'd go with Night At The Museum.  |  IP: Logged Ross Oba Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Kailua Kona, HI Registered: Oct 2005 posted 11-21-2006 02:43 AM                     I think Night at the Museum is going to be fairly big considering Paramount moved Charlotte's Web a week earlier because Fox switched to a Wednesday opening. Night at the Museum appeals to a wider variety. You have the teens who like the comedy of Ben Stiller, the adults who are interested in history and museums, and then you have the kids who like the animals. The only downside is that it is directed by the same guy who directed the god-awful Cheaper by the Dozen movies (the new ones).  |  IP: Logged John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-21-2006 04:16 AM                     As much as I hated the CBTD movies (and #2 in particular) they did make a lot of money. Charlotte or Night...tricky...Charlotte as you say is a G so there goes most of your audience at night, but matinees may make up for that. How long do you have to play them (minimum)?  |  IP: Logged Adam Fraser Master Film Handler Posts: 499 From: Houghton Lake, MI, USA Registered: Dec 2001 posted 11-21-2006 08:39 AM                        We will be hard booked for 2-3 weeks on these, but that doesn't matter too much to us as we die after New Years Day. Our business is 75% Summer and Holiday tourists. That is one thing that I like about Night at the Museum, the tourists would have less of a chance to see it in Detroit or Saginaw because it opens 5 days later.  |  IP: Logged Matt Fields Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 545 From: Ohio, United States Registered: Jun 2005 posted 11-21-2006 10:01 AM                     2 factors to consider: Which has the cheapest film rental? Which will sell the most concessions? I think 'Night' has the widest audience and will do the best nationally, but I don't know about your town.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-21-2006 12:30 PM                        To answer the questions: All of the films will have a 2 week minimum for small towns. That's pretty much a given. (Sometimes blockbusters have a 3-week min, but that probably won't happen with these.) I think all of them will be good concession movies. They'll all attract lots of families. Film rent? Hard to say...Sony is usually pretty high-priced, I'd bet Fox would have the best price. But that varies too. Our booker is leaning toward Museum but I'm still not sure.  |  IP: Logged Mike Spaeth Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1129 From: Marietta, GA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 11-21-2006 03:04 PM                        Night At The Museum is the best choice.  |  IP: Logged Darryl Spicer Film God Posts: 3250 From: Lexington, KY, USA Registered: Dec 2000 posted 11-22-2006 03:11 AM                    I would go with Night at the Museum and pick up Pursuit of Happyness after the two or three weeks of Museum. Happyness could get some award attention for Will Smith.  |  IP: Logged Dennis Benjamin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1445 From: Denton, MD Registered: Feb 2002 posted 11-23-2006 09:41 PM                        I read a college kid's review of a screening of "Charlotte's Web". This movie is going to be H-U-G-E. It will probably be a hit at the box office and get some Oscar nods. Major $ dollars $ with this one. If you have a single screen - you may be locking it up for a while. But it really depends on your crowd. "Night at the Museum" looks freaking hilarious and it will have legs. I think "Pursuit" will be the lesser of the three. A different crowd than the other two. If it were me - depending on my terms - I'd try to get at least two of these movies in the door within the month. "Charlotte' being my first choice.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-24-2006 12:10 PM                        "Museum" seems to have the best potential for drawing a wide-ranging crowd. It is rated PG (as opposed to Charlotte's G), has a star the 18-30 crowd likes (Ben Stiller), has older stars for the old crowd (Dick Van Dyke, Mickey Rooney), is a comedy (most people like to laugh around Christmas time), has an intriguing story, and is likely to have favorable terms. I think we're going with Museum.* * = Mind subject to change in the next few minutes  |  IP: Logged John McConnel Expert Film Handler Posts: 118 From: Okmulgee, OK USA Registered: Nov 2003 posted 11-24-2006 02:14 PM                        ERAGON hasn't been mentioned. Should a 2-screen theatre put it on the list to consider?  |  IP: Logged Mike Spaeth Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1129 From: Marietta, GA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 11-24-2006 10:19 PM                        No  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-24-2006 10:57 PM                        We thought about that one too. But since it doesn't have the huge pent-up expectations a la Lord of the Rings, we decided to wait on it. That was a tough choice too because the guy who wrote the book is from Montana. One thing's for sure - no matter what happens we'll have a stellar January line-up!  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.