|
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Scene missing...
|
|
|
|
|
Chris DeGour
Film Handler
Posts: 3
From: San Jose, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2006
|
posted 01-10-2006 12:16 PM
Ok, I just needed to know that before I said anything. Don't want to talk without knowing the full facts.
I work there. We noticed this post awhile ago (Yeah, we actually DO care ;p) and started working on seeing what the heck was going on.
We've had four prints move through the building, a Promo print, a damaged(replaced before you saw the film) print, and the two prints we were playing up to Friday. We confirmed that this scene was in both the promo and damaged prints. After reading that it was near the reelchange, I went up to check if maybe one of my booth folk had done something really stupid, but couldn't find any evidence of it.
So, I did what I had to, and sat through the first twenty min of each print to verify the scene's on there. I can tell you that it is, in fact on there, on both prints. There is no extra splicing done to perhaps show a person cutting then replacing the scene, so it's kind of a big mystery. I tell you right now, I haven't seen the movie, and probably won't, so my knowledge of the scene I mentioned above comes straight from watching it on these prints.
This isn't a company line or anything, in fact, I'm probably counter-policy talking anyway, lol, but I want to clear up confusion.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999
|
posted 01-24-2006 09:04 AM
And it even happens at Sundance...
From the Los Angeles Times.
SUNDANCE FILM FESTIVAL
Satire turns mystery: Where's the sex scene?
A 12-second hookup scene starring Katie Holmes was missing from the satirical political comedy "Thank You for Smoking" at a weekend screening.
By John Horn
Times Staff Writer
January 24, 2006
PARK CITY, Utah -- The Sundance Film Festival is all about discovery, but what filmmaker Jason Reitman found out during a screening of "Thank You for Smoking" was unusual even by Sundance standards: The Katie Holmes sex scene in his movie had vanished.
During a packed screening of his satirical political comedy on Saturday night, Reitman and his team were stunned to see that the 12-second hookup between a journalist played by Holmes and a tobacco lobbyist played by Aaron Eckhart had been snipped from the print.
"We were sitting there in shock," Reitman said Monday. "And I turned to other people who had worked on the film, and we were completely confused. But the audience didn't seem to notice or care." When the film was shown the next morning, the encounter was still missing.
Reitman was quick to tell the audiences what they had missed. The news solicited loud moans, but Reitman stopped short of acting out the racy, but hardly explicit, scene.
A couple of theories seemed possible. Had an enterprising operative from US Weekly sneaked into the Eccles Center projection booth and stolen the footage for an exclusive? Did Tom Cruise exert all of his Hollywood muscle to preserve the honor of his pregnant girlfriend? Or maybe conservative Utah activists felt Sundance's decadence had sunk so low, they took matters into their own hands.
The correct answer was not quite as provocative.
Reitman says that when the "Thank You for Smoking" print was assembled in Los Angeles, the scene — which comes at the end of the second reel but is preceded by a brief blackout — had been accidentally sliced off when the reels were spliced together.
The film, which is adapted from Christopher Buckley's novel, premiered at last year's Toronto International Film Festival and was sold to Fox Searchlight in a bidding war and is showing as a Sundance premiere; the movie opens in theaters March 17.
Still, Reitman found some humor — and potential box-office business — in the deletion.
"There were a couple of thousand people who saw the film at Sundance without the Katie Holmes sex scene," Reitman said. "I implore all of them to now go back and see the movie with the Katie Holmes sex scene."
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rick Hunter
Master Film Handler
Posts: 452
From: Melbourne, Australia
Registered: Feb 2003
|
posted 02-28-2006 07:25 PM
Now is seems 'The projector did it"...
'New news' today
AFP article dated 1/3/2006
quote:
'Smoking' sex scene not cut by Cruise
9:59 AM March 1
Director Jason Reitman says a projection error - not Tom Cruise - was responsible for a missing Katie Holmes sex scene during a screening of her upcoming movie, Thank You for Smoking, at the Sundance Film Festival.
"I was sitting there in the theatre, the scene was missing, and my immediate thought was, 'Oh my God, Fox cut the scene out of my movie,"' Reitman told AP Radio in an interview.
"And then I realised, 'No, if it's at the end of the reel, the projector probably just accidentally cut it out."'
Some blamed Cruise, Holmes' fiance, speculating that he had pressured Reitman, son of Ghost Busters director Ivan Reitman, to remove the scene.
"That's a fun story. I'd read that story. The problem is that it's not true," Reitman said.
"The problem with 'projection error' is that it's the truth but it sounds like a lie. It sounds an awful lot like 'wardrobe malfunction."'
"Wardrobe malfunction" was the term used to explain what happened when Justin Timberlake revealed Janet Jackson's right breast during the halftime show of the 2004 Super Bowl.
Holmes, 27, and Cruise, 43, have been engaged since June. They announced her pregnancy in October.
Aaron Eckhart stars with Holmes, Maria Bello, William H Macy and Sam Elliott in Thank You for Smoking, adapted from Christopher Buckley's satiric novel about a tobacco-industry spin doctor.
Reitman said more people probably know about his movie because the scene went missing.
"The most likely reason that they would have heard of it is because of the sex scene," he said.
The filmmaker also said Holmes' sex scene is as tame as anything you'd see on the Disney Channel.
Thank You for Smoking - with the sex scene - is slated for limited release in the US on March 17
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[sex]](graemlins/sex.gif)
inwhich I have never seen the beginning or ending to any of the ones I have, nor do I know what the plot line is....I watched the movie and it was just "ok".....With Heath Ledger mumbling through the whole movie, I am surpised people weren't complaining about the sound, sounding muffled. The only other movie I can think of that "should" have had scenes missing is King Kong.....It would have been really funny if you mixed up King Kong with Brokeback...You would have Jake Gyllenhaal telling King Kong...."I wish I knew how to quit you." Now....that's a movie...... ![[thumbsup]](graemlins/thumbsup.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
Darn those freakin' Brenkerts! 
Printer-friendly view of this topic