Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Back in the days of Showmanship (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Back in the days of Showmanship
Timothy Ervin
Film Handler

Posts: 84
From: Oklahoma
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-20-2005 02:18 AM      Profile for Timothy Ervin   Email Timothy Ervin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder what the business atmosphere between managers/owners and the staff was like back in the 40's, 50's, 60's and 70's? I wonder if it was more uptight, more professional? Was it a requirement for Managers to wear uniforms or business suits? Was it custom to address the Managers by their last name? What kind of problems did Managers have to endure, like shortages, inventory control, what kind of work scheduels did Managers have? I'm also curious as to the percentage of Managers/Owners who were female?

[ 03-20-2005, 03:55 AM: Message edited by: Adam Martin ]

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 03-20-2005 02:49 AM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
of teaser titles. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-20-2005 03:36 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yea, you should retitle the topic to "Back in the days of Showmanship", or such. Then,it fits what you're question is by coming across more clearly.

Actually, what you've came across with your questions, most of the large circuit DO require that they are addressed as "Mr, or Ms (and Miss, and Mrs if the title is desired..) no first names are allowed. For calling your superiors by their first name is absolutely unprofessional, due to the actual business requirements of the manager, whom is actually the businessman of the theatre. This is why he has assistant managers, supervisors, "chief of staff" supervisors - all must contain this "image" of professionalism, due that they ALL represent the manager when he is there, or not there.

Large complexes and circuits require that the theatre is run like a division in the Army: A general in command and his "chief of staff" to delegate orders. That theatre is HIS theatre.

Inventories were basically controlled by the manager himself, and only one or two people doing the counting, receiving stock, inventoring the stock into the count, watching the waste and damange, watching the orders to ensure that the stock is properly maintained from slow to busy times, stock is properly rotated for freshness, making orders during busy times like holidays and special occasions, concession counters not overly stock so that product doesn't stale out (esp. the chocolate items which age quickly due to their ingredients..)..and a whole bunch of other small tricks and systems that a manager can think of. (Why, I blurb on this part of inventory, or I've been there as a 3 time manager of a theatre, and I had inventory so well under control that it was a perfect system that I have made and succeeded in making it so....)

The majority of the managers that I've known, hate the Thurs inventory day. But as for me, since I had that system, I always looked forward to Inventory day knowing that I can breeze through that, and that's even whipping three movies together during the day while the assistant manager is running the place.

With all that curtails on Thursday I still managed to get out of that theatre before 1:00am.

If the manager had his theatre under control and a system well organized, he ususally can swing it to have two and a half days off without any worry. Doing this, his required hours being there by the company can be lower when he is organized and with a system...(and I've done that as stated above in my comment with the inventory)

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Kerchinsky
Master Film Handler

Posts: 326
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-20-2005 05:09 AM      Profile for Peter Kerchinsky   Email Peter Kerchinsky   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tim
Ah yes, the good old days of showmanship!!!
To be brief, when I started in this biz at the ripe age of 16, all employees were required to wear uniforms. Even the projectionists came to work wearing ties, which of course they removed when putting on their work aprons. We had two projectionists in the booth, a stageman, numerous ushers to take you to your seats, countless concession staff, and matrons who looked after the restrooms before and after the intermissions. The manager was always on the floor overlooking the entire operation. Only he could call the booth if there were any problems or complaints from customers.
Movies there always started on time. Sound levels were checked by one of the operators actually going into the theatre.
I could go on and one about my first theatre job, but tell you one thing, I miss it ALOT these days. Boston was a great movie town in the late 50s.

 |  IP: Logged

Timothy Ervin
Film Handler

Posts: 84
From: Oklahoma
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-20-2005 11:18 AM      Profile for Timothy Ervin   Email Timothy Ervin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Monte, the subject has been corrected. [Smile]

quote: Peter Kerchinsky was the last to post

Even the projectionists came to work wearing ties, which of course they removed when putting on their work aprons.

Peter, why was it required that a projectionist wore a 'work apron'? I have never heard of that.

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 03-20-2005 02:50 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
More like, he didn't want to get his street clothes dirty. People still dressed respectably in those days, and men wore hats. Management couldn't tell projectionists how to conduct their duties or what to wear.

Early 70s, when I came in:
Yes, it was "Mr." to the manager. Likewise, to the assistant or anyone older than you, but that was more a function of the time (or rather, the end of that era) than a house rule. As far as running the house.. remember Rodney Dangerfield in "The Projectionist"? He wasn't far from the mark.

Also, when I started in the biz, the projectionist was largely autonomous and was the sole craftsman/professional in the house. He often made more money than anyone else in the theatre by a good margin, including the manager.

 |  IP: Logged

Timothy Ervin
Film Handler

Posts: 84
From: Oklahoma
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 03-20-2005 03:01 PM      Profile for Timothy Ervin   Email Timothy Ervin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In one of the older single screens that I managed, the projection room was equipped with it's own restroom, and a fire escape. The projection room door and the room itself was "fire proof". Being only 19 at the time, I questioned this and was told that projectionist were always paid higher than even the manager because the job of projection was considered at one time 'dangerous' because of the carbon arc lamps and the threat of the film catching on fire.

I was also told that projectionists were always union members. When did unions pull out of theatres and why? I remember reading somewhere that General Cinemas was the last of the chains to have union projectionists. I am curious as to how other managers/operators/projectionists today would feel about being part of a union?

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-20-2005 03:04 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tim Reed
Also, when I started in the biz, the projectionist was largely autonomous and was the sole craftsman/professional in the house. He often made more money than anyone else in the theatre by a good margin, including the manager.

...thus the main reason of the unions - and that's ALL covered in another thread.

..and some of us, STILL to this day, manage to make more than the manager due to our skills and talents. And you don't know how many times that I went through HELL due to this because I was ABOVE the money level of the manager(s), who felt that I should be at the level of the lowly "shit-stick" employee-not worth a hill of beans.

Sometimes, one has to fight to prove his worth at times....

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 03-20-2005 05:00 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Timothy Ervin
projectionist were always paid higher than even the manager because the job of projection was considered at one time 'dangerous'
They were paid well because it was a skill that involved mastery of several disciplines. It took years to gain competence and attain journeyman status. Not burning up was a factor, certainly, but it was a craft, a profession. In the 30s, the job of projectionist held about as much prestige as being a doctor or a lawyer.

Projectionists were not all union.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-20-2005 06:09 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tim Reed
In the 30s, the job of projectionist held about as much prestige as being a doctor or a lawyer.

True, for I've heard also that in those nitrate days of two projectionists being up in the booth at all times, for fire and safety reasons. Yes, it was and still is a trade to us few. I've got books and pictures showing these booths with two operators on duty. Now, that was an operation!

I remember when I was a kid at our local theatre, which was a circuit theatre (Fox Intermountain), the manager wearing a bright red jacket with the FOX logo on the front welcoming the crowd coming in. The concessionaires were in also a maroon dress uniform with gold pinning down the sides, also with the same logo on the front. The doorman's outfit was in black with the gold pinning down the pantlegs and the ushers were in dk blue uniforms. The ushers with their "pillbox" caps seating the public as best as they knew how with the red coned flashlights, and checking auditoriums every half hour. The manager(s) was addressed as "Mr./Miss ----"

The lobby decked out in blue/gold foil wallpaper with 11x17 window cards frames in certain areas with B/W cards showing "teaser" scenes of the movies coming and movies now playing. Neon shining in beautiful arrangements in the outside foyer area.

Big old 21 inch back lit autitorium clock with the glass front advertising the local business next door, and we would watch that clock on if it's the right time when the show began. Then, the big red waterfall curtain opened up, the multi-colored foot light arrangement would turn off, the projection light hits the inner title curtain, which then opened up sideways. Never was the screen allowed to be seen "naked" - always the title curtain hid the screen. Just before "the End" would hit the screen, a curtain cue (which was located on the lower right of the picture and being made by that cuemaker device) would pop on and the title curtain would close, and by the time those words would hit the screen the waterfall curtain would descend down and on came the footlights.

Then the ushers would be there at the head of the entranceway thanking us for being here-to escort us out to the lobby. I was walking out of the theatre with my bottle of NEHI grape soda and my package of NECCO fruit flavored wafers.

..that was showmanship to the max!

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Kerchinsky
Master Film Handler

Posts: 326
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-21-2005 04:54 AM      Profile for Peter Kerchinsky   Email Peter Kerchinsky   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry but it's early morning now, but my response to the question on why we wore work aprons......they were actually aprons with tool belts attached. We always had tools readily available in case of whatever. My main "tool" was a clothespin to remove the old used up carbon that was still hot. It only lasted a week or two because it was wood.
Also, if memory serves, we always had a pair of needle nose pliers to pull out the hot aperature plate during reel changes when going into a different format.
Where I worked the trailers were run on a seperate reel, never, never spliced onto a feature head etc. Sometimes we had to move pretty fast to change the plate, lens, carbons etc. since we only ran 2 trailers in those days.
WOW, do I have it easy now or what!

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Spohn
Film Handler

Posts: 95
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Jan 2003


 - posted 03-21-2005 10:28 AM      Profile for Jim Spohn   Email Jim Spohn   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tim... At the Fox Theatre in Bakersfield, in the 50's and 60's, the manager AND the assistant manager wore tuxedos. The door-man wore grey pants with a satin stripe down the leg, a tux shirt with bow tie and a red dress jacket. The manager and assistant were ALWAYS refered to as "Mr.Winslow" and "Mr. Yates"! They ran the theatre with an "IRON-FIST". Everyone else wore some type of uniform suited for their individual job of usher, snack bar girl, ticket-taker. Projection people wore suit and tie. The main projectionist would put a frozen dinner in the lamphouse when he started the first show and just after the intermission of the second show had his dinner! Jim Spohn

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-21-2005 01:16 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Jim Spohn
The main projectionist would put a frozen dinner in the lamphouse when he started the first show and just after the intermission of the second show had his dinner! Jim Spohn

In hindsight, not a healthy thing to do, since carbon ash contained "rare earth" elements that helped light output, but weren't good to ingest or breathe in. [Eek!]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-21-2005 02:01 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Peter Kerchinsky
My main "tool" was a clothespin to remove the old used up carbon that was still hot. It only lasted a week or two because it was wood.

...and you didn't have a pair of pliers to yank out those carbons out of the clamp jaws in the lamphouse so you wouldn't have to worry about burning up clothespins?

Did you have an old coffee can to dump the rods in?

quote:
The main projectionist would put a frozen dinner in the lamphouse when he started the first show and just after the intermission of the second show had his dinner!
I've seen that one also a time or two and wondered on the "rare earth" ash concept as well. But the guys would make sure that the alum foil was kept intact over the dinner.

Those Strong Futura II's were great for cooking dinners inside.

I used to warm up a dinner on top of the lamphouse being a bit of heat on the upper surface.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Fuentes
Mmmm, Dr. Pepper!

Posts: 1168
From: Corpus Christi, TX United States
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 03-21-2005 02:06 PM      Profile for Jeremy Fuentes   Email Jeremy Fuentes   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
I used to warm up a dinner on top of the lamphouse being a bit of heat on the upper surface.
Definitely "dinner done wrong" [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.