my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Butter vs. Butterfat.

Author Topic: Butter vs. Butterfat. Scott D. Neff Theatre Dork Posts: 919 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Oct 1999 posted 01-11-2005 12:47 AM                        I really should know the answer to this, but why does Odell's specify that it's butterFAT? Is there really a difference?  |  IP: Logged Kyle McEachern Expert Film Handler Posts: 165 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Feb 2004 posted 01-11-2005 03:53 AM                 I have no proof that this is the case, but the way that it was explained to me when I was first hired at an establishment that used such a product was that the butterfat was the result of melting butter, letting it congeal, and using only the "fat" part of it (whatever was solidified at the top? I forget)...and the reason was that it a)enhanced the flavor more and b)lasted significantly longer. I could be totally wrong, but that's how it was explained to me.  |  IP: Logged Scott D. Neff Theatre Dork Posts: 919 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Oct 1999 posted 01-11-2005 05:05 PM                        Yeah -- but I remember how they explained projection to you at said establishment.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-11-2005 05:41 PM                        If you buy butter at a store, a good chunk of it is paraffin (wax) which keeps it in shape, even unrefrigerated. Odells has none of that in it, it's just pure butterfat. Interesting tid-bit: We used to use Odell's butterfat, but we got a free sample gallon of SuperKist 2 at a convention, so we decided to try it out one weekend. We didn't get one single complaint, in fact we got several compliments about our "better" butter. So needless to say, we switched to SuperKist permanently at about 1/4 the cost of the butterfat. To this day, we constantly get compliments about our great popcorn and have never had a complaint about the topping.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-11-2005 07:57 PM                     SuperKist 2 is indeed the best butter substitute. I still prefer Odell's real though. Steve  |  IP: Logged Scott D. Neff Theatre Dork Posts: 919 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Oct 1999 posted 01-11-2005 10:08 PM                        When I started in 1994 we used Promise at the theatres I worked for. And I liked it, it wasn't bad at all. I couldn't understand why all our customers were so uppity about whether it was real or not. Then I went to work for Century and they have Odell's butterfat and DAMN did I realize what a fool I'd been for ever wishing butter-flavored topping on the world. I love da reel butter. Although now if ever I help I customer I have to bite my tongue from asking "Would you like butter flavoring on that?"  |  IP: Logged Dean Kollet Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 591 From: Florida State University Registered: Jul 2003 posted 01-11-2005 10:11 PM                     is SuperKist 2 a lot healthier?  |  IP: Logged Wayne Keyser Master Film Handler Posts: 272 From: Arlington, Virginia, USA Registered: May 2004 posted 01-11-2005 10:42 PM                     "If you buy butter at a store, a good chunk of it is paraffin (wax)" - Sorry, but no. Natural butter as bought at the store contains butterfat plus assorted milk solids and proteins - it is the latter which are fairly perishable (but which also lend some complexity to the flavor). Melting the butter and skimming the nonfat portions makes "clarified butter" (in American chef's terms) or "ghee" (if you're from India) and improves its shelf life. Probably, the vendor is looking at three factors: the improved shelf stability, the opportunity to sell the removed milkfat solids elsewhere, and the inability of most McDonald's-trained palates to notice the difference. Nonetheless, you surprise me - I thought no butter at all was sold to top theater popcorn - the only toppings I heard of were coconut-oil "golden topping" and that sort of straight-to-the-artery-walls artificially flavored stuff.  |  IP: Logged Anslem Rayburn Master Film Handler Posts: 476 From: Yuma, AZ, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 01-11-2005 11:51 PM                     I was under the impression that water was removed as well, which is why popcorn doesn't shrivel up as it does when you pour regular melted butter over it.  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-11-2005 11:58 PM                     I wonder if you had two butter pumps, one with REAL (clarified) butter and one with the standard "lubricant" whether you could charge people extra for the "good stuff"? I suppose keeping inventory on two items and keeping two butter pumps clean then being sure people actually PAY for the "upgrade" would make it not worth it. But, still, I wonder.  |  IP: Logged Scott D. Neff Theatre Dork Posts: 919 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Oct 1999 posted 01-12-2005 02:44 AM                        Apparently Blumenfeld Theatres of San Francisco, used to charge $0.50 for extra butter on their popcorn because they used the real butter. This was during the time when nobody else was using real butter, so people were willing to pay. Now of course Blumenfeld isn't charging for butter because they have no more theatres.  |  IP: Logged Brian D. Whitish Expert Film Handler Posts: 103 From: Seattle, WA, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 01-12-2005 02:06 PM                     At Landmark Theatres we use Odells butter and dont charge extra for it. But when I worked for a company that didnt use real butter we used superkist2 and it was okay. Ive also used Whirl, which is a Proctor Gamble product, and it was pretty good too. Dont know if that is still available.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 01-12-2005 10:58 PM                        I seem to vaguely recall Edwards charging extra for real butter, but that was a LONG time ago, like in the 60s or early 70s when they were still very small. Or am I imagining this?  |  IP: Logged Aaron Sisemore Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day! Posts: 3061 From: Rockwall TX USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 01-13-2005 12:50 AM                     I recall as a kid that the drive-ins around here also charged extra for buttered popcorn, and even had special 'buttered popcorn' containers for it... -Aaron  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.