Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Booking Favoritism (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Booking Favoritism
Brent Mahaney
Film Handler

Posts: 43
From: Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 08-24-2003 06:38 PM      Profile for Brent Mahaney     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Are there any managers in competitive markets who find that certain studios favor one chain over another?

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 08-24-2003 07:04 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
yes I have seen this before. At one time there was a twin that was right down the street from an 8 screen then a 10 screen. Tht theater did not run films by buena vista or warner bros.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 08-25-2003 11:30 AM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That may be more a matter of the relationship between the individual studio and the theatre's owner. Both of those companies are notorious for tough business practices, Either one will put an owner on a very short financial leash for very little reason, and then pretty much leave him there... high advances, cashiers check, short pay, etc.

Disney is most likely to make a sale if they can make a buck... but they are tough negotiators when it comes to percentages.

Warners is a curious outfit. They'll be the company that seems to defy logic, when it comes to whether a booking might be good for both parties. They have a strange policy in the West, at least in some markets, of holding a title for something like 6 weeks after it leaves the first & sub-run houses, before making it available to discounters.

If an owner was to find studios that can be toughest to deal with, those two would be right up there. It just might be that the owner would rather not deal with it... or maybe he's been taken off service by those studios.

Favoritism isn't a word I'd use since, aside from the possible legalities involved, these things can usually be worked out with the right approach & contacts.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Spaeth
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1129
From: Marietta, GA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-25-2003 01:30 PM      Profile for Mike Spaeth   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Spaeth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One needs to look at the "potential gross" of the involved theatres. Obviously if one theatre has a higher potential gross they will be more likely to play that house. To do this, compare similar-grossing pictures that play to the same demographic. Also, if it's large chain vs. smaller chain ... the larger chain will tend to get better product because they have more to bargain with.

 |  IP: Logged

Kevin Wale
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 167
From: Guymon, OK USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 08-25-2003 02:53 PM      Profile for Kevin Wale   Email Kevin Wale   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have no experience in a market where there is competition and I'm not the booker at our theatre, but I have noticed in our case especially that the size of our town has quite a bit to do with it sometimes.

Marci X has 10 prints available in Oklahoma. Well, we are not one of them being only a 10,000 population town. Being an 8 plex doesn't seem to help in such situations.

Maybe the following is because we don't really have any competition but it always seems to me that we are having to figure out ways to get rid of a film more than we are having to beg for a print. Jeff at Paramount cracks me up... he is forever calling asking to hold a print one more week. LOL. He is definately one that seems to just bend over backwards for us. He's always friendly and always seems to do the best he can to be fair.

Which brings me to what maybe is a different while similar reason for the situations sparking this topic. Maybe some markets are having less a problem with the studio and a problem with thier particular area. Since Disney is closing in Dallas, I truly believe that is why we can't get Open Range even though Kevin Costner lived in this town for a period of time and there are more Costner's in this town than you could ever count. I mean, when the booking agent is out of a job in a week, how hard is he going to try and get a theater a print compared to last year? And I don't say that as to attack his character, he likely has a lot on his mind. I doubt very seriously that it is malicious or careless, but more likely just a case of preoccupation. Who doesn't suffer from that from time to time?

The times I do end up speaking to the film companies, most of them always seem to want thier product out there. Is it lack of competition, area agents, or the repore the owners have built up with these companies?

Perhaps the answer is all of the above.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 08-25-2003 06:40 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
That may be more a matter of the relationship between the individual studio and the theatre's owner. Both of those companies are notorious for tough business practices, Either one will put an owner on a very short financial leash for very little reason, and then pretty much leave him there... high advances, cashiers check, short pay, etc.

In the case of the twin at the time, It is now defunct, it was owned by loews. I tend to believe it was as Mike stated. The othere theaters, the 8 screen was first then the 10 came later, are Cinemarks. All other features at the time that were played there alternated with the other Cinemark on the other side of town. Loews had another theater over there that would share movies with that location so if Cinemark played at that location the film played at the twin unless it was booked up then it played at the other cinemarks.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-25-2003 06:44 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I used to fill in at an AMC (ex-GCC) theatre which was in the same zone as a very successful (but dumpy) National Amusements theatre. Invariably, they would get all product from Universal, Paramount (not surprisingly), MGM, UA, and New Line. We didn't even show trailers for films from those distributors. On the other hand, we got most of the 20th Century Fox/Fox Searchlight and Warner Bros. product.

I never understood exactly why this situation worked as it did, but both theatres seemed happy enough with the arrangrment.

 |  IP: Logged

Jason Burroughs
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 654
From: Allen, TX
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-26-2003 11:17 AM      Profile for Jason Burroughs   Email Jason Burroughs   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In Dallas anyways, it seemed that if there was a GCC in any particular zone they almost always got the Universal pictures.

This was pretty much a rule, but there were a few exceptions.

 |  IP: Logged

Andrew McCrea
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 645
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-26-2003 12:08 PM      Profile for Andrew McCrea   Author's Homepage   Email Andrew McCrea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, I hear about this all the time from Americans, and I see only Americans have posted, so how does the Canadian market work?

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 08-26-2003 08:54 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
.. we can't get Open Range...
Open range opened sort of "medium-wide", so a lot of theatres missed on it. There was alo some question as to how it would open, so some conservative bookers might have taken a pass.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Spaeth
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1129
From: Marietta, GA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-26-2003 09:24 PM      Profile for Mike Spaeth   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Spaeth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kevin:

Hang tight ... as prints come off-screen ... you will be able to open one. I was trying to open it here this week (and I'm in Atlanta metro) ... but there are no prints available. When hey come off I will open it ... just tell your customers to be patient ... that's the way the industry works.

 |  IP: Logged

Kevin Wale
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 167
From: Guymon, OK USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 08-26-2003 10:05 PM      Profile for Kevin Wale   Email Kevin Wale   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh man... they can get hostile sometimes. LOL

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-26-2003 10:10 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm sure there are cases of "favoritism" in some markets. However, I think the really big problem is distributors and their branch office personnel are not familiar with the actual theaters in which they are booking prints. And their data is notoriously out of date.

I've seen this big time in Lawton, OK. Through the 1990s a number of theaters have opened and closed. For a long time Carmike only had the Showcase Twin and Video Triple, both built between the late 1960's and early 1970's. Litchfield opened the Cache 8 theater in the early 1980s. In 1994, Carmike opened their Carmike 8 site on the west side of town. The Showcase Twin closed down (bldg converted to a Blockbuster Video) and the Video Triple went 2nd run. Yet it took over 6 months and some loud complaints on my part and that of management to get any DTS prints booked at the Carmike 8. Folks were still booking as if they were doing it for the Video Triple (that theater closed down years ago and the building now houses a hardware supply store).

In 1996, the Carmike 8 nearly lost out on "Independence Day". Fox was all set to book that one at the Cache 8 theater in spite of how the allocation agreement flip-flop was supposed to go. I personally got hold of some people at Fox's office in Dallas. Apparently they did not realize Carmike had a new 8-plex in Lawton with 2 THX certified screens equipped with DTS. After that, I wondered if I hadn't made some noise about that one if Carmike would have missed out on all those "Star Wars" releases.

I think a big part of the problem is distributors just look at seating numbers per auditorium and use that to make bookings. The Cache 8 theater I despised for years had by far the largest seating capacities in the area. A couple of their screens had over 400 seats. It didn't matter that the sound and picture was atrocious. I guess when the distributors actually checked attendance numbers at that theater and compared them to the competition they changed things up. Now that old 8 plex is going 2nd run.

I think the distributors and booking offices need something akin to CinemaTour to make choices and keep the data up to date.

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 08-26-2003 11:17 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wouldn't call it favouritism, they just like some theatres better than others. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Ky Boyd
Hey I'm #23

Posts: 314
From: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-03-2003 02:11 AM      Profile for Ky Boyd   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wouldn't call it favoritism, but in some markets Paramount, for example, has a customer in that market and typically sells all of their film to that customer. Usually this has some historical basis. However, it isn't an un-bendable rule. For instance we operate an 5 screen arthouse and our competitor operates a 14 screen plex and a 6 screen move over house. In January, after a great deal of effort, our booker convinced Paramount to sell The Hours to us rather than placing it at the 14 plex, where all of Paramount's mainstream product typically goes (We typically get everything from Paramount Classics, but that's a different and pretty autonomous division). Ultimately Paramount agreed and later admitted to our booker that it was the right decision. The caveat was that since we took The Hours we also had to be prepared to take Paramount's next picture (whose title escapes me at the moment) if our competitor refused to play it as a means of protesting selling The Hours to us. For us it was an acceptable risk and we didn't end up having to take the second picture plus we had a very nice run on The Hours. The important thing about the deal was that we were willing to take that second film. Now, the next time Paramount has a quality film like The Hours we might not have to fight so hard and so long to get it. Tenaciousness does have its rewards. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.