my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Bowling Out? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Bowling Out? Mitchell Cope Master Film Handler Posts: 256 From: Overland Park, KS, United States Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-24-2003 06:36 AM                     Do you think there will be a theater owner backlash against Michael Moore and his film "Bowling For Columbine"? The Dixie Chicks lost radio playtime for being controversial as we went to war. Will the same fate come to Michael? (In keeping with Brad's rules, no political comments here.)  |  IP: Logged Nicholas Roznovsky Expert Film Handler Posts: 156 From: College Station, TX, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-24-2003 12:01 PM                        I think for the most part, Bowling For Columbine has played itself out in most of the major markets across the country. While there will be the usual post-Oscar bounce, I don't think there will be any concerted backlash against the film. This film has already had to overcome two big stigmas with a lot of people: it's title (most Americans do judge a film by its title!) and the sometimes sickeningly gruesome subject matter. I think Michael Moore's views were pretty much evident before the Oscars. Anyone who's seen any of his previous stuff should know which end of the spectrum he lands on. I don't see why theater owners should drop a film just because the director has a big mouth. Of course, I'm sure that someone will get a wild hair and go picket a movie theater somewhere. There's always somebody who does. And, of course, the local theater will be labeled as "Anti-American". I hate small town like that. I had members of a local church sending me "prayergrams" praying for my soul when our theater showed XXX . They didn't even bother to find out what the movie was about! They just assumed that it was a porn film and decided that I was a minion of Satan. I still have some of them framed in my office, just as a reminder of what I'm dealing with. My opinion is that moviegoers should get to decide what they should watch, not a couple of people raising a fuss in the community. If we gave in to the community "leaders", I'd be showing A VeggieTales Movie, Pollyana, and The Apple Dumpling Gang 365 days a year.  |  IP: Logged Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-24-2003 02:05 PM                        quote: I think for the most part, Bowling For Columbine has played itself out in most of the major markets across the country. That is true, but look at the statistics.... league bowling is seriously down all over the country. Damn evil gun nuts!  |  IP: Logged Gunnar Johansson Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Gothenburg, Sweden Registered: Mar 2003 posted 03-24-2003 03:42 PM                        No offence but it might affect american theatres, but it might actually play even better in some foreign countries. Sweden is usually very pro-american, and just because of that there´s sometimes a "back-lash" movement were this film fits right in. Missed the Awards live (on between 2.30-6.30 am) but some swedish news showed part of it, calling it a scandal. On the whole I agree with Nicholas, but it might look different outside of the States... My two cents //Gunnar  |  IP: Logged Steve Kraus Film God Posts: 4094 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: May 2000 posted 03-24-2003 03:52 PM                    We blow a lot of smoke about free speech in this country but as soon as someone (like the Dixie Chicks) expresses a free opinion they are ready to put them out of work. What a bunch of hypocrites. No, it's not a governmental action but when it's big business thwarting your ability to make a living then it might as well be.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-24-2003 04:07 PM                        As a businessman you do not have an obligation to provide a free forum for your opponent to espouse their own political agenda. That's just silly. It has nothing to do with stifling free speech. Michael Moore or anyone else in showbiz can write an op-ed piece for the New York Times if they want to exercise their right to free speech. Or get on the Bill O'Reilly show on Fox. Or just tell the media in general "Hey, I'm available and willing to talk" and I'm sure the paparazzi will fawn all over them to get the story.  |  IP: Logged Mike Olpin Chop Chop! Posts: 1852 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Jan 2002 posted 03-24-2003 04:12 PM                     I dont think that any backlash against Mr. Moore's film from theatre owners. If the film seels well, you keep it. However, if the film-goers choose to backlash, than the film wont continue its run for long. Basicly if the film sells, keep it! If it doesnt, remove it.  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 03-24-2003 04:46 PM                        quote: As a businessman you do not have an obligation to provide a free forum for your opponent to espouse their own political agenda. True, but they can certainly sneak in under the guise of commercial entertainment. One good example is "On Deadly Ground", the 1997 Steven Segal film. After the usual show as a martial arts master, he proceeds to "stand at a podium to deliver a long lecture about the dangers of big oil companies ruining the environment and pleading for an alternative source of energy". It wasn't that great a film to begin with, but that sermon at the end made you feel like you'd just paid $7 bucks to watch him preach... a feeling not totally unlike having paid the same bucks to watch commercials!  |  IP: Logged Michael Gonzalez Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 790 From: Grand Island , NE USA Registered: Sep 2000 posted 03-24-2003 09:59 PM                     The Dixie Chicks and Michael Moore have the constitional right to say what ever they want. Consquently, any one else has to constitional right to disagree with what they said by not going to see Moore's movie (or even protest where they are playing) or by not playing the Dixie Chicks music or in some cases steamrolling their CDs. It cuts both ways. So there may be an attendence realted backlash to Moore's comments but I also agree at this point that the movie has pretty much ran it's course.  |  IP: Logged Rachel Craven Madam Moderator Posts: 2190 From: Pensacola, FL Registered: Dec 2000 posted 03-24-2003 10:15 PM                     Well, I can now comment on this as our work day has gone by. We have a Bowling for Columbine 9:45pm show running which did very well last week. This week we have it running at the same time and 4 people showed up. Although it was a slow night we have not had less then 15 people in there since we brought it back (We had it before and then brought it back because it was up for an oscar). Apparently there is some sort of backlash amongst our customers.  |  IP: Logged Mark J. Marshall Film God Posts: 3188 From: New Castle, DE, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 03-25-2003 02:27 PM                    quote: as soon as someone (like the Dixie Chicks) expresses a free opinion they are ready to put them out of work. Who's "they"?  |  IP: Logged John Pytlak Film God Posts: 9987 From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922 Registered: Jan 2000 posted 03-25-2003 02:43 PM                        Please move the "Dixie Chicks" discussion to the Political Arena forum.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 03-26-2003 10:53 AM                        Moore's Rant could end up having a positive effect. Let's face it, the documentary Oscar winner very rarely gets a major theatrical release anyway, and some people who heard Moore sounding off on the podium might be intrigued as to what the film which put him there is like. This was certainly the case when Crash came out - the local religous fanatics and elements of the press and radio ran a campaign to ban it where I was working at the time. The result was full houses for what would otherwise have been an obscure Canadian art movie. Many customers walked out a reel or two after the start: the older ones out of disgust, the younger ones out of boredom.  |  IP: Logged Charles Everett Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1470 From: New Jersey Registered: May 2001 posted 03-26-2003 12:48 PM                     Nicholas is correct: Bowling for Columbine has played out most everywhere. The AMC Empire and Landmark Sunshine in NYC are the only first-run theaters near me still showing it. In this case it might have more to do with product flow than politics. Spirited Away is being re-released to cash in on its own Oscar. Laurel Canyon and Bend It Like Beckham have their national arthouse break Friday.  |  IP: Logged Michael Gonzalez Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 790 From: Grand Island , NE USA Registered: Sep 2000 posted 03-26-2003 01:10 PM                     We have had Chicago in one of our smallest houses for the past couple of weeks, however, I am moving it to one of our larger houses this weekend just in case.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.