Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » NYC bans cell phones at movies (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: NYC bans cell phones at movies
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 02-13-2003 03:37 AM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's the link: http://www.msnbc.com/news/872092.asp?0cv=CB20

This should be interesting. I wonder how they plan to enforce this... [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-13-2003 07:33 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At the very least, a law like this will better allow theatres to take action against patrons that thoughtlessly annoy others talking on their cell phones during a movie, or by not turning off the ringer. New York state has been pretty agressive in ticketing drivers holding cell phones while driving, and I suspect NYC will support theatres in enforcing this law against the more obnoxious cellu-louts. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-13-2003 08:21 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with the sentiment, but do we really need a law for this? Unlike the issue of using a phone while driving an automobile, I can't think of any obvious public health or safety issue that would justify this. Sure, it annoys other people, but so does talking and crunching popcorn too loudly.

If we are going to pass laws to punish people who have bad manners, then why stop with cell phones? Let's start fining women who wear white shoes before Easter or after Labor Day! [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-13-2003 08:27 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't really think the police will waste valuable time patrolling theatres looking for violators. But if a theatre has to deal with an unruly patron who refuses to comply with not using their cell phone, it does give them a means of prosecution.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Gonzalez
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 790
From: Grand Island , NE USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-13-2003 03:11 PM      Profile for Michael Gonzalez   Email Michael Gonzalez   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder if a law like this would then allow the theaters to use cell phone jamming technology? If it is illegal for people to have cell phones in the theaters with them, than a theater can't get in trouble for jamming phones that are not supose to be there in the first place. It makes for an interesting legal argument anyway.

 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 02-13-2003 07:01 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The law takes effect next month, and while it includes a penalty of a $50 fine, proponents expect it to be self-policing, in that
having the law sanctions the public's desire to be free from annoyance. There's no expectation of any significant expense for enforcement.
In my neighborhood almost every dog owner picks up after his pet,
and I never heard of anyone here being cited for failure to observe that law since it was passed. So may it be with the new
cell-phone usage law!
The law applies to stage presentations and movies, but exempts athletic stadiums.

 |  IP: Logged

Nate Lehrke
Master Film Handler

Posts: 396
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 02-13-2003 11:34 PM      Profile for Nate Lehrke   Email Nate Lehrke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think that this whole thing is a squander of lawmaker's time. I don't see any proper ways to enforce it & can't envision wasting the "the system's" time to give someone a ticket for it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jack Ondracek
Film God

Posts: 2348
From: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 02-13-2003 11:59 PM      Profile for Jack Ondracek   Author's Homepage   Email Jack Ondracek   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I wonder if a law like this would then allow the theaters to use cell phone jamming technology? If it is illegal for people to have cell phones in the theaters with them, than a theater can't get in trouble for jamming phones that are not supose to be there in the first place.
...An interesting thought. What I wonder is how this got past the cell phone lobby. They've been pretty aggressive in the 'states, and have been a big part of why we're one of the few (only?) countries where you can only use passive methods of cell phone "jamming".

On the other hand though, New York's mayor did veto it, and the city council had to override it... so maybe the Cell phone industry was putting the pressure on him.

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 02-14-2003 02:44 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cell phone jamming would contravene federal regulations, which a municipal government can't overrule. So nope, no jamming for you! [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 02-14-2003 05:18 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
NYC has become the so-called "quality of life" issue city. Trouble is, the government picks and chooses what is and what is not a "quality of life" issue. Evidently not repairing roads that have become pothole-laden obstacle courses ISN'T a quality of life issue (more like a quality of your axel) but arresting guys who want to clean your windshield IS. Having garbage flying all over the streets ISN'T a quality of life issue, but making cab drivers say "Have a Nice Day" IS. But I digress.

There is no question that police aren't going to patrol theatres (although this might not be a bad idea) looking for cell phone violators, but as Gerard mentions, it is more of a self-policing thing. People are more apt to be conscious of an action that is "illegal." Scott asks if we need a law for this. Well, while I was sitting in front of a woman who was describing in detail all the action of the entire film THE MATRIX to a friend on her cell phone, I sure would have liked to have a such a law to back up my...."Hey lady, will you get off the freakin phone and watch the damn movie?!"

As for jamming cell phone signals, that's still an FCC no-no, but the FCC can easily change its regulatory mind, especially if more states make it illegal. Then there is passive blocking, which isn't illegal -- material that, as I understand it, can be added to building materials and even to paint (wasn't that discussed on this forum some time back?) that can prevent cell signals from getting into the auditorium.

The theatre would probably have to post that information, that cell phones will not work in the theatre proper, to avoid liability from, say, doctors or other emergency personnel who rely on cell phones and would be sitting there in a "treated" theatre, not realizing that they couldn't be reached by the outside world.

Whatever did we do before cell phones? You would think we came out of the womb with these things attached to the side of our heads.

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Gracia L. Babbidge
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 709
From: Bowdoin, Maine
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 02-14-2003 05:23 AM      Profile for Gracia L. Babbidge   Author's Homepage   Email Gracia L. Babbidge   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott -tsk tsk tsk!

The 'no white shoes after Labor Day & before Easter' fashion rule is now not only out-moded, but also non-existant!

...

On another note about bad manners / rule-breaking…
One thing that really gets my goat is driving down the highway at night, ahead of someone who leaves less than two car lengths between my back bumber and their front bumper, and decides that leaving their "brights" on is the thing to do! [Mad]
And they never seem to take notice of me indicating my annoyance with the ever-useful hand gesture-> [fu] [evil]

Maybe I'd be less aggravated over such boneheaded things if my [eyes] weren't so amazingly sensitive to light, but it can't be helped. [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Loy
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 156

Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 02-14-2003 09:50 AM      Profile for Randy Loy   Email Randy Loy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
About a month ago my wife and I saw "Catch Me If You Can" at a local Loews Cineplex theatre. Prior to the feature they ran the customary coming attractions and policy trailers, among which the hi-lite was a cell phone policy trailer that we think was put out by Cingular Wireless. It was funny but also gets the point across.

The trailer starts with a shot of a movie auditorium, from the perspective of looking from back to front toward the screen. The movie is in progress and you suddenly hear the annoying sound of a cell phone ringing. A guy in the front row answers his cell phone loudly, then launches into a chatty conversation. Suddenly he is catapulted out of his seat and slams into the screen before sliding down onto the floor below seat level. The on-screen audience then cheers as text copy appears saying something to the effect of, "Cell Phone Ejector Seats. Coming Soon To Theatres Everywhere!" The live audience in our auditorium also laughed and cheered!

Has anybody else seen this trailer? It does a good job of pointing out how annoying cell phones are in movie theatres, while still maintaining a sense of humor about the issue.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 02-14-2003 10:23 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There was an incident in Edinburgh just after Christmas in the 'no mobile 'phones' area of a restaurant. A yobbish executive type was screaming away into his, finished his conversation and got up to go to the loo. When he returned, he noticed that his mobile 'phone had disappeared from the table. A few minutes later the chef appeared and presented him with the 'phone - deep fried in batter with a salad garnish! [Big Grin]

I would love to do something similar with people who ignore the 'no mobile 'phones' carriage on trains, namely chuck the offending 'phones out of the window while travelling at 120mph. Even better; chuck out their owners, too.

This rule is so widely ignored that the only way you could enforce it is either to employ policemen whose only job is to arrest offenders (and frankly, I'd prefer them to be catching murderers and drug dealers), or a technical solution, i.e. legalise the use of signal blockers. I wish they would do the latter and that blockers would be widely installed in mobile-free areas of restaurants, trains and cinemas.

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Gonzalez
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 790
From: Grand Island , NE USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 02-14-2003 11:19 AM      Profile for Michael Gonzalez   Email Michael Gonzalez   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Your missing the point. It may be a FCC violation to jam cell phones, but the point of my legal argument is that if it is illegal to have a cell phone in a theater (or at least have it on), then a theater's management could not get into trouble for having a jammer because legally there should be no signals to jam. In essance all a theater would be doing is enforcing the law. This is what we call a legal loophole. It is an unintended benefit for theaters when such a law is passed.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-14-2003 11:59 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Gracia,

Just slow down. Don't decrease your speed quickly and don't hit the brake, just ease off the gas a touch. I always find it amusing how long people will actually ride your bumper before they realize just how slow they are going. I've gotten down to 35MPH before on a 60MPH single lane highway with no car anywhere in sight before they woke up from their driving coma and passed.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.