Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » GANG TAPES Blacklisted? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: GANG TAPES Blacklisted?
James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-08-2002 09:47 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
HERE

I know Aint It Cool News isnt exactly the most trustworthy outlet for information, but has anyone heard anything from their chains about this?

------------------
Find me online
AOL: Dexter Caldwell
yahoo!: dexter_caldwell

"It is the opinion of the entire staff the Dexter is criminally insane."


 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 08-09-2002 09:28 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sounds like the kind of movie that just wouldn't have widespread appeal to do enough business. That's probably the real reason theatre chains don't want it.

------------------
"Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk!" - Homer Simpson

 |  IP: Logged

Tim Reed
Better Projection Pays

Posts: 5246
From: Northampton, PA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 08-09-2002 10:38 PM      Profile for Tim Reed   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
>>Everyone connected to the film wants to see it in theatres. Lion’s Gate wants to open it wide (yes, wide). So what’s the problem?<<

Of course they do. Judging from the "review", it sounds like its main problem is that no one can care about the characters.


 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 08-10-2002 12:05 AM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's one small step backward for film production, one giant step forward (out of the trash heap) for exhibition. My guess is that the chains are not as much worried about violence as the are about alienating the majority of their customers by putting this garbage on their screens. There's nothing positive about it and it's certainly not entertainment. Even the review (apparently written by one who has little command of the English language as he constantly resorts to using foul expletives) was both disgusting and depressing.

Bob
The Old Showman

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-10-2002 10:10 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Absolutely correct -- the chains don't shy away from violence if they think they can sell it. The mistake that a subculture makes is that they assume everyone else is concerned about their microcosum; in reality, most of the rest of the world really is not. The choice the exhibitors have made here would seem to be based on the all too powerful bottom line: they don't think this picture will sell. Period. No more, no less and surely there is no "conspiricy" to prevent it from being shown. What's worse, this thing was probably shot on video and not film, so it may look as bad as the content sounds. Personally, I would rather stare at cloths tumbling in a washing machine than watch anything resembling the bottom of the barrel quality of THE BLARE WITCH PROJECT.

Those who are offended by not being able to see this Lion's Gate offering in a theatre will just have hold on to their banger headband colors and wait for it to come to hood (er, I mean home) video. No doubt there it will find its nitch market of all those likeminded "hood" folk that enjoy this brand of "reality" and make Lions Gate some money to boot.

Frank

PS -- If this offends the "reviewer," I suppose I will now need to look over my shoulder to see if I am going to get "capped," as he put it.

 |  IP: Logged

John Daily
Film Handler

Posts: 45
From: Upstate, NY, USA
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 08-11-2002 09:50 AM      Profile for John Daily     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wouldn't say I'm looking forward to this exactly, but I will make it a point to go wherever I need to in order to see this.
Blair Witch used this as a gimmick; for Gang Tapes this seems to be the best way to make personal (to those of us comfy behind our keyboards) a way of life that we can't comprehend. It is ugly, but people live this way, and that fascinates me. It's like self-genocide, and I don't understand it. I may never, but I feel the need to at least try.
For the record, all people fascinate me. I enjoyed Titanic not because of the lame ficitonal romance, but because it got me into a year-long obsession to learn as much as I could about every documented passenger on board that ship.

Gang Tapes seems to me, to be not exactly exploitation (if it did, I'd most certainly be agreeing with the rest of you). It would have been easy to just have these guys ad-lib throughout the whole film ala Blair Witch, but Adam Ripp took the time to have them 'translate' a written script into their vernacular, where he could have just tossed in a bunch of "Yos" and "40s" and called it good enough. Also, it is not just about senseless violence. This is a coming of age story. It's easy to write off an entire subculture, but what about the true innocents who have to survive within it? What about the young children who grow up with it because it's all they've been exposed to? In this movie, we see both sides, loving relationships within this subculture as well as the chaos. This is, by all accounts from those who have seen the film, as close as I'm going to get to understanding short of moving to Compton.
Or Baltimore's Western.
Or Syracuse's East side.
Or...(pick your own metro area here).


 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-12-2002 01:50 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well put, John, but I was not putting the film down, well, maybe I was bemoaning the fact that it was filmed on video -- my exerience so far with that method of getting something on the screen has been quite negative -- if you film it in video, then it should be presented on video -- that's what public access cable, PBS and direct-to-DVD are for. When I go into a cinema, there is a certain expectation of a level of quality that offerings like BLAIR WITCH or CHELSEA WALLS simply don't meet.

My point was simply that there is no "conspiracy" to prevent this particular film from playing in theatres. Why would anyone expect the chains to play a title that is obviously far off main-stream demographics? Hell, they won't EVER play anything but the top ten grossing pictures of the moment; they won't play foreign films unless they are one of the very few that move into that top grossing magic circle. For the most part, they won't even play indepentent titles. Lion's Gate is smart to play this in art houses which have been the mainstay of just such off-center titles. It is the kind of film that I would run in my theatre. I just don't see what all the moaning is about. Most independents market and play their films this way; the economic reality simply is that small films just don't get picked up by chains unless the distrib decides that he wants to spend 3 million on an ad campaign and see if he can get his unknow stars booked on all the morning talk shows. Short of that, forget about chains being interested, unless it's off season and there is no new product and LG wants to practically give it away. This is a business and it has some harsh realities.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 08-12-2002 01:57 PM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I notice that Lion's Gate does not have enough confidence in this project to four wall (pay the theatre a flat rate to run it), as many other independant films have to do to get a theatrical run. I guess they do not think that it will make back the cost of the auditorium rental.

/Mitchell

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 08-12-2002 02:48 PM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lions Gate doesn't need to four-wall for anything -- it's a minimajor just like Miramax. LG releases niche product (Lovely & Amazing, The Wash) plus the occasional mainstream title (Frailty).

Artisan had Gang Tapes and then dropped it, probably for cause: In a lot of small towns police vigilantes and/or religious zealots might want to shut down a theater showing anything they do not like.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 08-12-2002 04:43 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SOMEBODY has to try to preserve decent morals in this country Charles. In the last several decades I have seen far too many exhibitors partner (either willingly or through coercion) with a degenerating production industry to pump garbage into our communities in their quest to create appetites (with some success) for that type of film and in the process contribute greatly to the decline of the moral standards on which this country was founded and doing it all in the name of "freedom of expression". Well, those who object to films like "Gang Tapes" have the same right to "freedom of expression" and it says alot when those who support the exhibition of such films attempt to demean those who object. If "Tapes" had been made to inform the public of a lifestyle for the sake of asking for help it would be a different matter. But it is obvious it was made for its shock value and to feed the afforementioned appetites.

Bob
The Old Showman


 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-13-2002 08:42 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bob,

I appreciate your concern for the morals of the country, but I don't think that judging whether a film meets your standard of morality without first actually seeing it furthers your argument, especially when you make claims that "it is obvious it was made for its shock value...." Sorry, but there is no way for you to make this assumption from reading a review. There is nothing obvious about it, especially since the reviewer can hardly be considered capable of articulating or even understanding the intentions of the director, give the "review" he has written.

There are many serious films, books and even paintings that touch on subjects that are might be personally unpleasant, but reveal part of human nature that we might not approve, yet they remain great works of art. Their validity isn't negated because of the subject matter, and many times it is exactly because of the treatment of the subject matter, as distastful as it may be, makes them important, enduring classics. Even the Bible is rife with stories that focus on aspects of man's immoral behavior. While it sheds light on this behavior, it certainly doesn't advocate it nor does the fact that you can read about adultery, murder, theft of birthrights, infidelity, fornication, etc. in the Bible, make the book "immoral." And in a pluralistic society, one man's immorality very often is another's inspiration. Personally, I find it immoral that certain segments of our society focus only on sexuality as the kingpin of what makes something moral or immoral, yet you rarely hear any complaints from this group about the unrelenting violence that is so pervasive in the media. Hence the old put-down of the MPAA rating system, "Show someone gently caressing a nipple and the film gets an X; show someone cutting the nipple off with a chainsaw, it gets an R."

Suffice to say, the subject of this post was why the film was not picked up by the major chains. There are economic reasons for that that don't seem very mysterious and IMO don't constitute any conspiracy or blacklisting, just the normal economic pressures of the marketplace. As far as the content of the film and the way that content is portrayed, I contend before anyone can go off making moral judgments about it, they need to have seen it first.

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 08-14-2002 09:31 AM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I will simply never buy the arguement that a movie, any movie (or album, book, or whatever art form you choose) will contribute to moral decline. I grew up watching plenty of G.I. Joe, I Spit on your Grave, Saving Private Ryan, Omen, Faces of Death, Jenna Loves Rocco, or whatever else one cares to list as being inappropriate to children. I have never been in a fight, been in jail (except on a tour during a criminology class I was taking), drank heavily, fantasized about doing things with little boys, or whatever. I think people who have the opinion that movies hurt morals are pointing the blame in the wrong direction, away from the parents where it belongs. Desensitization is another issue, however, and I do believe I have been desensitized to a lot of violence, sex, drug use, etc. It doesn't make me want to do them, it just makes me care a little less when I see it happen.

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 08-15-2002 03:20 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for your reply Frank. Perhaps a better choice of words would have been "seems to have been made for it's shock value". However, having been in the exhibition field for more than 25 years I have seen enough of all types of films to have formed an opinion on the information the "reviewer" gave. Garbage is garbage and I don't have to eat it to know it's garbage.

Bob
The Old Showman

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-15-2002 07:10 PM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
But sometimes you can find some pretty neat stuff in the garbage...


=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 08-16-2002 10:22 AM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gang Tapes is being released by indie distributor Urbanworld Films. Pic opened 8/14 in LA and opens 8/21 in NYC.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.