Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Star Wars Episode 2 is DYING! (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
Author Topic: Star Wars Episode 2 is DYING!
Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 06-08-2002 09:45 AM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That huge 3rd-weekend falloff on Episode 2 tells me Fox and Lucasfilm have had to renegotiate those ironclad terms.

Here's how Reading Cinemas in Manville NJ has run Episode 2:

Weeks 1 & 2: 3 prints (2 giant houses + 1 large house)
Week 3: 2 prints (2 giant houses) -- drop 3rd print
Week 4: 2 prints (1 large house + 1 medium house)

I assume Reading will drop the 2nd print next week to accommodate product flow.

Have your theaters moved Episode 2 into smaller houses?

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-08-2002 10:31 AM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One of our prints is in our second-to-smallest house, and I think the other is in a medium house. But there's still the problem with the DLP! We have that thing for 8 weeks, and it's wasting our largest house!

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 06-08-2002 10:42 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well if you would have listened to Lucas you'd have DLP in ALL of your auditoriums and you could just e-mail Episode 2 down to a smaller house as needed. That'll teach you not to make the radical changes that Lucas suggests!

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 06-08-2002 11:43 AM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have to agree with Joe on this. Funny thing is Spiderman is still outdrawing that Star Wars POS.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-08-2002 12:19 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
We just dropped one of our Star Wars prints, but we still have all of our Spider-Man prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 06-08-2002 12:58 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The inverse square law is starting to take effect up here, too.


 |  IP: Logged

Adam Wilbert
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 590
From: Bellingham, WA, USA
Registered: Mar 2002


 - posted 06-08-2002 10:03 PM      Profile for Adam Wilbert   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Wilbert   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We're doing better for spiderman (in our smallest house) than star wars (in our largest). Hopefully we'll be able to change auditoriums next week, or at least for Scooby Doo. I'm looking forward to putting that "Ends Thursday" snipe on our roof marquee for SW! tee-hee!

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-09-2002 01:26 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Isnt there another thread somewhere that we kind of took a guess at how each would face each other? I would like to know just how we each thought the respective pictures would do?

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-09-2002 01:28 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dave,

Yep, it's in this forum. Title is "Spider-Man vs. Star Wars Episode II."

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 06-09-2002 05:16 PM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
From the Associated Press:

<<<
"Attack of the Clones" continues to slump well behind its predecessor, "Episode I The Phantom Menace," which was approaching $300 million by this point three years ago.

"Attack of the Clones" is expected to top out at a bit more than $300 million, compared to $431 million for "The Phantom Menace."

Factoring in ticket prices that are about 16 percent higher today, "Attack of the Clones" grossed less than half the $25.6 million "The Phantom Menace" did in its corresponding fourth weekend.
>>>

Hehe, sorry about that Georgie. But how could this happen when it was filmed and in some cases presented, in digital?

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 06-09-2002 07:29 PM      Profile for Chad Souder   Email Chad Souder   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Its not a real huge surprise after seeing them both. Spider-Man is the better movie, and that's what I'm hearing from customers. Plus, it's got popular songs in it, so you've got radio stations saying Spider-Man 20 times a day too.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Fermanian
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 101
From: Sainte Adele, Quebec, Canada
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 06-09-2002 07:46 PM      Profile for Tom Fermanian   Email Tom Fermanian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey gang, out of the 363 available indy screens available in Quebec that Flatly refused Georgie and His Original /$%%%$?&$" deal! (meaning Nobody played it) It seems?? that none of these guys will play this picture on a moveover basis! They had all predicted that SWep2 would crash early! Ha! they are supposed to be the small uninformed theatre operators that know nothing! Well they do know that they didn't get screwed with a bad deal!
GL seems to be their attitude!

------------------

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Konen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 981
From: Frisco, TX. (North of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-10-2002 08:58 AM      Profile for Paul Konen   Email Paul Konen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have moved 2 of our prints down to smaller houses. We also will continue to play DLP in really full houses.

Luckily for me, I get to drop the DLP in the big house in two weeks for Lilo & Stitch.

Paul.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-11-2002 10:15 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul said: "Luckily for me, I get to drop the DLP in the big house in two weeks for Lilo & Stitch."

Any word on other feature films that will be available for Digital Cinema after "Lilo & Stitch"? I recall the dry spell after "Fantasia 2000" lost its legs a few years ago.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 06-11-2002 12:25 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't know Lilo and Stich would be in DLP, but I heard the Windtalkers may be. We should loose Star Wars by the time Windtalkers comes out, but not Lilo and Stitch. We have Star Wars in DLP for 8 weeks. It originally was supposed to be 12. Good thing they were able to get out of that one!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 7 pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.