Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Ebert and Roeper review the theatre operations (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Ebert and Roeper review the theatre operations
Scott Madsen
Film Handler

Posts: 58

Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 03-08-2002 12:27 PM      Profile for Scott Madsen   Email Scott Madsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is from Boxoffice.Com, written from Showest by Francesa Dinglasan. Anyway, I thought it was interesting as it seems to talk about many things that are talked about in this forum..

O riginally we came here to criticize trailers," renowned film critic Roger Ebert told delegates attending the Wednesday afternoon event at ShoWest, "but the studios wouldn't give us [any] trailers."

A safe decision, it would seem, on the part of Hollywood. After all, while the trademark thumbs-up from the pair can mean extra box-office bucks for a given film, a much dreaded thumbs-down from the reviewers, most famous for their television program "At the Movies With Roger Ebert and Richard Roeper," can equally result in a notable downturn in interest for a particular release.

What Ebert and Roeper said they would offer instead to convention attendees were their opinions and suggestions as to the elements necessary to create the ideal moviegoing experience, or as Roeper phrased it, what would go into the "Ebert and Roeper multiplex."

"Sometimes it's disheartening that the worse thing about the experience is the [actual] movie," said Ebert.

I ronically, though the afternoon's proceedings had been dubbed "Ten Things We Love About the Movie Theatre," Ebert and Roeper's sharp wit and cutting remarks were more appropriate to a list of "Things We Hate About the Cinema." However, that same criticism that had been so feared by the studios was so engagingly and humorously delivered that many exhibitors in the audience felt the event to be the highlight of the entire convention.

Roeper's first targets were the lighting and climate control of theatre auditoriums. He noted that sometimes auditorium lighting had not been dimmed enough, interfering with the audience's ability to see the onscreen picture, while the air conditioning always seemed to be cranked to its coldest setting. "We're not slabs of meat," he joked.

For Ebert, the disappearance of the nation's movie palaces and glorious single-screeners is one of the major tragedies of today's exhibition business. "Save the really big screen," he urged ShoWest delegates. Noting that he understood that the lack of business driven to a theatre with just one auditorium was a major factor in their demise, he underscored the true pleasure of viewing a film on an immense screen. "Around the country, really big screens are being lost," he remarked.

Also on the two critics' list of changes to be made in an ideal world was the idea of senior staff members always being present at a theatre. "I would like to see a higher level of staff, in terms of managers that are there," said Roeper. "On a serious note, if someone in a theatre's acting up, it would be nice if someone [with a level of authority] was there...so that you don't have to act as your own cop."

Ebert added that an experienced or senior-level employee would also be more likely to understand problems that sometimes arise regarding the quality of screen presentation. "I get letters complaining about the boom mic [being visible during a film screening]," he said. "It would be nice if [staff members] who know what 'framing' means are onsite."

A dditionally, Ebert took the very unique stance of advising theatre operators, "I'm going to ask you not to rush headlong into digital cinema." As the first voice in a long time at any exhibition convention to come out supporting celluloid over digital projection, he stated, "Hollywood has not spent one dime studying...how digital images enter the human mind."

"There's a theory that people enter a hypnotic state when watching video," he explained. "It gives a different experience [than watching film]....When you replace celluloid, you may be giving [movie patrons] an experience that they didn't know they'd be getting."

Quite passionate about the issue, Ebert said that when the inevitable conversion to digital took place, people were "going to lose celluloid magic." What people would get instead, he insisted, were images that would be "cold, but technically perfect."

Other suggestions proposed by the two critics included ensuring that the projection bulb is turned up, as "diminishing it does not preserve the life of the bulb"; bringing back Saturday morning "kiddie shows," which Ebert believes "will get kids into a moviegoing habit in a good way"; and dedicating a few auditoriums in a multiscreener to art or specialty fare, or as Roeper described it, to put "the word 'mutli' into multiplex." "The same [major Hollywood release] plays over and over again [on different screens in the same theatre]," he observed. "We envisioned and hoped that there would be space for films like 'Memento.'"

Additional recommendations were implementing a "no kids policy" because, noted Roeper, "Sometimes parents can't be trusted not to bring kids" to films inappropriate for them to watch, and offering a healthier variety of concessions. "Is it possible to sell anything at the refreshment stand that won't kill?" asked Ebert.

Widely applauded by ShoWest delegates was Ebert's vocal abhorrence of cellular phones and his plea for "cell phone blocking" in theatre auditoriums.

Conventioneer enthusiasm for Ebert's suggestion, however, seems more theoretical than practical, as evinced by the countless Nokia and Motorola chimes that continue to ring at ShoWest events.


 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 03-08-2002 01:57 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How come these guys never came to any theaters I worked at??

 |  IP: Logged

Steven Pickles
Film Handler

Posts: 81
From: Gainesville, FL, USA
Registered: Mar 2001


 - posted 03-08-2002 05:22 PM      Profile for Steven Pickles   Email Steven Pickles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw Roger Ebert talking about this very article on CNN Headline News the other evening. Some of things I agree with, for example, the availability of management and staff that understand what is going on. As for the "no kids policy," well, I think its a good idea but there will always be the parents who will disregard or be upset with the rule (other threads have dealt with this, so I won't go into how or why). The healthier concession idea fascinates me. I'm sure there are good reasons why salad is not sold at a movie house—probably because it wouldn't sell enough to make it more profitable than soda or candy? I invite responses, but I when I think of a movie going experience, the last thing I'm concerned about is what I'm going to (or not) eat based on the health of the food. It seems a bit odd, but I could be wrong.

 |  IP: Logged

Tristan Lane
Master Film Handler

Posts: 444
From: Nampa, Idaho
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-08-2002 10:36 PM      Profile for Tristan Lane   Email Tristan Lane   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 

I feel somewhat reassured that cinema could improve when a respected and well known critic talks about presentation quality these days. Hopefully corporate theater companies will concentrate on improving the movie-going experience rather than trying to fill their deep pockets at the sake of the customers. Maybe it is wishful thinking. Long live the independent theaters!!!

Tristan

 |  IP: Logged

Steven Pickles
Film Handler

Posts: 81
From: Gainesville, FL, USA
Registered: Mar 2001


 - posted 03-08-2002 11:30 PM      Profile for Steven Pickles   Email Steven Pickles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tristan,

I don't think that just because Roger Ebert says there are things wrong with the presentation at a lot of theatres that there will be a huge change in the way companies do business. I do not feel reassured in the least as the companies know their operators are not properly trained and that there are problems in the booth. I don't mean to be a downer, but I just don't see Mr. Ebert causing much of a change at all.

 |  IP: Logged

Tristan Lane
Master Film Handler

Posts: 444
From: Nampa, Idaho
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-08-2002 11:45 PM      Profile for Tristan Lane   Email Tristan Lane   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess I am just trying to stay optomistic

-Tristan

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-09-2002 04:34 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well you may be right about Mr. Eggbert not causing much change, after all, he has never influenced a directors course of action from film to film. But I like the salad idea. I hate the stuff, but back many yar ago when I was climbing the corporate ladder at little ceasers, we introduced salads to our lineup. The stuff is relatively cheap to make, and store cold all day. they only took a minute to make if you ran out, so you didnt have to make so much that you had to throw it out at the end of the day.

I think offering healthy alternatives would be bold and daring, but there was a time when offering coffee and cheesecake were the same daring move, but now it is becoming commonplace.

Thats my opinion, and im sticking to it, because I spilled my coke on the floor and my feet are stuck. Damn Utah Jazz losing to the Knicks of all teams. I mean really, couldnt the damn usher figure out what row 13 means? I said row 13 is where my coke spilled, and she mopped row 12. Did she not see me? I waved, I yelled, and still, she mopped a dry floor, leaving me in my own liquid sticky coke mess. ANd the jazz LOST.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Pauley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 173
From: Huntington, WV, USA
Registered: Jun 2000


 - posted 03-10-2002 11:11 AM      Profile for Greg Pauley   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Pauley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw Mr. Ebert walking thru Paris Casino and he didn't appear to have been eating to many salads lately!


 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 03-10-2002 11:53 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My sister was in Chicago, saw Mr. Ebert coming out of a restaurant. She said he looked shorter and, um, slightly more portly than he does on TV.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-11-2002 05:11 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On the issue of light levels in the auditorium, I would like to invite Mr. Ebert to try making his way out of one when it is filled with smoke, and then ask him if he still thinks the lights are too bright.

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-11-2002 02:21 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I can side with mr eggbert on the lighting, IF he is referring to total darkenss in the theaters vs. not dimming the lights far enough so you arent able to have a hair count on the balding guy ten rows in front of you.

I have been to many theaters where they dim the lights just enough to give the impression that they darkened the theater, but you can still see the liver spots on an old mans hands from twenty feet away. I want to see the movie.

It can be totally disorienting to have a pitch black theater while watching a movie, in fact in can be painful to many movie goers. Aisle lighting is not nearly enough, and if it is too high, you can land an airplane in there.

Many movie theaters keep it pitch black in order to not have to worry about having bright enough bulbs running, or having a clean screen.

I always kept my light up JUST BARELY, only enough to let you see that YES there are seats and YES there is a way out. BUT NEVER bright enough to see if the person you are sitting next to is wearing clothes or not.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 03-11-2002 02:37 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So if I go to your theatre, I can strip mid-show and no one would notice?

Kickass!!

 |  IP: Logged

Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 03-11-2002 07:10 PM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've been to theaters where they had lights on the side walls and on the ceiling, but the ceiling lights stayed partway on during the movie! They should be completely OFF; the side lights if properly installed can be turned up bright enough for safety without interfering with the screen or being distracting. A certain theatre I worked at had the side lights almost completely off while the ceiling lights were blaring; I tried explaining what they should do but nobody seemed to understand what the hell I was talking about!

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-11-2002 10:28 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am sure most studio's would listen if he gave the thumbs down to a film after it was reviewed in a comercial plex with the regretable standards many provided rather than in the stae of the art facility Mr Kraus provides because the presentation so distorted the films intent

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-13-2002 03:01 AM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually james, we had to throw someone out of Final Fantasy for taking his clothes off and masturbating mid movie.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.