Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Ground Level   » Paying for trailers?

   
Author Topic: Paying for trailers?
John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-25-2001 04:55 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The link that used to be here is no longer available. Joe has solved that problem...

Here's one we made earlier...


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-25-2001 06:54 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DON'T CLICK THAT LINK!!!!!!!

There are way too many pop-ups.

Instead, I have pasted the entire article below:

Studios Boo Sony's Pay for Movie Trailer Play
•  Entertainment: They worry that the strategy for ensuring a spot for 'Animal' could end a source of free ads.

By PATRICK GOLDSTEIN, Times Staff Writer

In a controversial marketing gamble, Sony Pictures quietly made a deal with four theater chains to pay for the placement of previews for upcoming films that previously were shown at no cost to studios.

The move is being criticized by executives from other major studios who worry that, at a time costs are skyrocketing everywhere in the movie business, the free advertising may be in jeopardy.

Jeff Blake, Sony's president of worldwide marketing and distribution, said he made the payments to ensure that a 60-second trailer for "The Animal," an upcoming comedy starring Rob Schneider, would play before showings of "The Mummy Returns," the biggest hit to date among releases for the summer movie season.

The studio payments covered a two-week period in early May during the theatrical launch of "The Mummy Returns." "The Animal" opens June 1. Blake refused to say how much Sony paid, but sources close to the company say the payments probably totaled as much as $100,000.

"It was a minimal amount of money, but it was well-spent," Blake said. "I don't apologize for anything we did. A picture like 'The Mummy' doesn't come along every week, and it gave us a unique opportunity to get 100% placement in many situations to expose our movie to the broadest possible audience."

The precedent of paying for exposure that had previously been free caused an uproar among rival studios.

"People are upset because this puts the industry on the beginning of a very slippery slope," said DreamWorks SKG marketing chief Terry Press. "If you do it once, why wouldn't you do it again? As soon as it happened, other exhibitors started approaching other studios to see if they would pay for trailers too."

Ten major cinema chains representing more than half the 36,000 screens in the United States are operating under bankruptcy protection.

Top marketing executives at General Cinema Theatres and AMC Entertainment Inc., two of the theater chains that received payments from Sony, could not be reached for comment.

Competition among studios for the placement of trailers is always fierce. Typically, five trailers are shown before the running of a feature film; two are given to the studio that released the movie, leaving three slots open to plug movies from other studios. The running time of each trailer is limited to 2 1/2 minutes.

So far the fight for trailer placement for summer movies has focused on "The Mummy Returns," which has made $150 million at the box office and was viewed as the premium launch pad for new releases. In the hopes of getting more trailers played before "The Mummy," a number of studios, including Sony, cut special 60-second trailers of their upcoming films.

Sony was in a bind because it had already made an arrangement with exhibitors to have its trailer for "Final Fantasy," another upcoming film, played before "The Mummy." When exhibitors balked at playing two Sony trailers, the studio opted to pay to ensure that "The Animal" preview would get blanket exposure.

"I told exhibitors that I wanted to see it played as religiously as the Los Angeles Times advertisement is played," Blake said. (Many theater chains show promotions for The Times in exchange for a discount on advertising rates in the newspaper.)
Blake said he went to great lengths to get the trailer played because "The Animal" is an important summer release for his studio.

Industry rivals believe Sony is under intense pressure to have a successful opening for the film, which was made by Revolution Studios and Adam Sandler's production company, two key movie suppliers at Sony. The pressure has been especially heavy since "Tomcats," Revolution's first Sony release, bombed at the box office in late March. Revolution is run by Joe Roth, the former chief of Walt Disney Studios whose name has surfaced regularly as a possible successor to Sony studio chief John Calley.

Blake insisted that Revolution received no special treatment. Tom Sherak, a Revolution partner, defended Blake, saying "Jeff shouldn't be criticized for finding a way to get his trailers better play. If anything, he should get a raise."

It's unclear whether Sony will get its money's worth. However, an industry audit of trailer play for May 4 through 6, the first weekend of release for "The Mummy," showed that "The Animal" was No. 6 in total trailer play, appearing on 46% of the 552 screens surveyed. It ranked far ahead of MGM's "What's the Worst That Can Happen," a film opening on the same day as "The Animal." But it ranked behind other early June releases, such as "Evolution" and "Atlantis.


 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-25-2001 07:46 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's funny...when I click on it, all I get is the page I was trying to bring to everyone's attention. No pop-ups...

Weird.

------------------
Children really brighten up your life...they never turn off lights.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-25-2001 08:32 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The first time you click on it, the pop ups appear. They no longer appear for me, either. But I just tried Netscape (not my usual browser) and the pop ups appeared.

Try deleting your cookies and cache to experience the fun and phenomenal web design that ARE pop ups!


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 05-25-2001 02:26 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Pop Ups" are a PAIN!!!

Plus, they load a handful of cookies.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-25-2001 04:51 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Isn't this "pay for play" sort of thing what got radio stations into trouble in the 1950s?

(BTW, turning off Javascript in your web browser will kill popups...)


 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-25-2001 06:33 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott-

That's what I used to think! I turned off Javascript and it got rid of a few pop-ups. But many still come to haunt me. They can do it through ASP technology (where the server does all of the scripting and just sends HTML pages to the user---lots of them) and there are other ways to do it as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-25-2001 07:47 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Also turning off Javascript can cause problems with interactive programs (like this forum) to not function properly. Better to leave it on unless you are using a text browser.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Spaeth
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1129
From: Marietta, GA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 05-28-2001 02:30 PM      Profile for Mike Spaeth   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Spaeth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why not get paid? Why should the theaters have to purchase advertising materials for a studio's film (posters, etc.)

 |  IP: Logged

Sherry Legare
Film Handler

Posts: 12
From: Thornhill, ON, Canada
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 08-30-2001 03:45 PM      Profile for Sherry Legare   Email Sherry Legare   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What happens to the little guys like us? We are a small chain with only a handful of screens. We run second-run movies and as is have to beg, borrow, and steal to get trailers because distributors fail to see the extra revenue discount theatres generate for them. No distributor is going to pay us to play their trailers.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 08-30-2001 05:44 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's right, second run houses & single screeners who only book so many movies would get shafted. It would basically be a plug for the Home Video release, or a message to take your business elsewhere to a place that shows the film featured in the trailer.

Even at my 18 plex, I like to have control over the trailers I put on the movies. If the film looks stupid, I don't run a trailer for it unless someone from management forces me to.

------------------
http://www.mullerfamilytheatres.com

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.