Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | my password | register | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Dunkirk (2017) IMAX Digital version

   
Author Topic: Dunkirk (2017) IMAX Digital version
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4016
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-22-2017 09:26 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A thread for every format? Well ok then.

7/22/17 2:00PM
Regal Valley River 15, Eugene
Theater 9: Digital IMAX

I haven't seen an IMAX show at this theater since Interstellar. I thought Interstellar was too loud. Dunkirk was even louder, if that's possible. I regretted not having earplugs.

The movie is so immersive that it's painful to watch. But that's as Nolan intended. On that scale I have to give it a 10, but it's not for everyone.

The presentation was fine, probably as good as LieMax can be. It was pretty obvious when scenes were shot in 65mm vs something else (presumably 35mm). The 65mm Image detail & clarity stand out. Floating aspect ratio not too distracting. Interestingly, the 35mm material sometimes had "negative splices" visible at the bottom edge of the frame, reminiscent of scope film with improperly cut plates (I guess -- you tell me).

Not recommended, but also a must-see in a good theater.

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Purcell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 154
From: Van Nuys, CA
Registered: Dec 2015


 - posted 07-23-2017 01:55 AM      Profile for Tyler Purcell   Author's Homepage   Email Tyler Purcell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David, the whole movie was shot in 65mm. 5 perf vertical and 15 perf horizontal.

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4016
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-23-2017 09:57 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I stand corrected. I hadn't researched it fully before posting and my impression from seeing the movie was that some of it was not 65mm.

The aspect ratio was varying between 1.90 and 2.20 (according to the interwebs). The negative splices were visible only on the 2.20 shots. Not all of them but enough to catch my eye.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1313
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 08-02-2017 04:43 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
question - is the IMAX laser version 12-channel, the Smithsonian certainly claims it is?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2018 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.