Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Hail, Caesar!

   
Author Topic: Hail, Caesar!
Aaron Garman
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: Toledo, OH USA
Registered: Mar 2003


 - posted 02-05-2016 11:19 AM      Profile for Aaron Garman   Email Aaron Garman   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you love the movies, this is the movie for you. A hilarious take on a day in the life of running a movie studio during the golden age. Expertly written and cast, I had a terrific time.

And the cinematography is mesmerizing. Roger Deakins is at the top of his game here.

AJG

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 02-05-2016 01:20 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
and it's going out in 4K DCP - AMC Mazza here I come! the movie looks like a hoot...

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 02-05-2016 04:40 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: AMC Council Bluffs 17, Council Bluffs, IA
AUDITORIUM: 6
PRESENTATION: AMC Recline-O-Vision, Something Something Digital
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: None [Cool]
RATING: Three stars (out of four)

THE PLOT: An actor is kidnapped, America's Sweetheart is unmarried and pregnant, and a cowboy is miscast. Wackiness ensues.

As loaded as this movie is, there is a clear standout star, and it's Josh Brolin. His Eddie Mannix is the guy tasked with keeping his actors in check and keeping the studio running. Everyone else is part of the paintbrush, even if Clooney steals every scene he's in (as absurd as that sounds).

The sets and cinematography are a wonder. Easter eggs are everywhere. Standout scenes include a religious discussion, Scarlett Johansson's water sequence (which looks like something straight out of a Wes Anderson feature), and the Navy musical scene, the funniest thing in the movie.

And yet...I wouldn't put this on the list of the Coen Brother's best efforts. And I'm not sure why.

Still, well worth the bother. I would even encourage multiple viewings. You're certain to catch little nuances you missed the first time.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank B. McLaughlin
Film Handler

Posts: 76
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Dec 2011


 - posted 02-06-2016 06:56 AM      Profile for Frank B. McLaughlin   Author's Homepage   Email Frank B. McLaughlin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, it is not the best from the Cohens - BUT well worth watching.

The only problem - could find but one 4K presentation: Alamo Drafthouse.

Finding 4K in anywhere in Denver is a challenge.

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Russell
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 142
From: Aurora, USA
Registered: Aug 2015


 - posted 02-06-2016 04:33 PM      Profile for Matt Russell     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although I'm not a huge fan of the Coen brothers, I already knew that they could pull off a good comedy so I was glad that Hail, Caesar! was lots of fun to watch. The plot basically revolves around an "everyman" studio fixer having to juggle between looking over multiple film productions, publicity, bad habits, and now his biggest star, who gets kidnapped by a group of classy gents named "The Future" (and there's a lot of funny stuff that the Coen's use with this group). Josh Brolin (who plays the studio fixer, Eddie Mannix) does a wonderful job and so does George Clooney as the moronic star of the "film" Hail, Caesar!, but I thought the real breakout was Alden Ehrenreich, as a star who's known for his stereotypical roles as a cowboy, and the film does a great job showing how the character struggles with adapting to making films of other genres. For actors who got such promotion in the marketing, Scarlett Johansson and Jonah Hill go heavily underused in a side story, and while I understand that there's already so much going on in the film, I wish they took more time to developed these characters. Channing Tatum has a delightful scene as an actor preforming in a musical, but until the end, he doesn't do very much as well. Tilda Swinton, however, was very good (albeit brief) role as a pair of twin gossip writers. So overall, Hail, Caesar! is more of Eddie Mannix's movie, and that ain't a bad thing at all, but I wish the film also focused more on the actors' stories as well, but overall, I thought it was a very well-made film with lots to enjoy about (and the cinematography did a really good job at showcasing that 50s Hollywood feeling).
Film: 3 out of 4 stars
Presentation: 4 out of 4 stars

 |  IP: Logged

Carol May
Film Handler

Posts: 48
From: los angeles, ca, usa
Registered: Nov 2006


 - posted 02-06-2016 05:08 PM      Profile for Carol May   Email Carol May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw a noon show at The Grove (Pacific Theaters). There were maybe 40 people there. Or 30.

It was the usual Coen brothers absurdity, I couldn't really tell you what it was about, but I liked it. It's definitely aimed at movie buffs, lots of inside jokes. The costumes and set decoration are beautiful, the color is very saturated. It all feels post-war, except at the screening of the cowboy movie, would it have been 1.66? Small detail.

I'd certainly recommend it to anyone who posts to this site.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-08-2016 04:41 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Cowboy Movie (whatever they called it) starts out with a VistaVision title card, so yes, it would be in 1:66 or a ratio close to that.

The movie plays fast and loose with dates, so you just have to think of it as Generic Fifties.

The actual movie screams to be shot in 3-strip Technicolor. I don't know how it looked in 4k, but 2k is just not saturated enough. The Cohen's gave up on film one film too soon.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 02-24-2016 07:31 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the movie in 4K on a Sony projector and colors & sharpness were astounding - and it was shot in Kodak 35mm film stock to boot!

as to the movie itself, it was bit too patchworky and not really sure what the point was, but enjoyable - I loved the dance sequence.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Monohan
Master Film Handler

Posts: 379
From: San Francisco CA USA
Registered: May 2014


 - posted 02-26-2016 10:45 AM      Profile for Terry Monohan   Email Terry Monohan   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I enjoyed this new film and It looked great on the huge curved XD screen at the Cinemark 9 in downtown SF. The movie was a little slow in spots but the different use of screen sizes played out well on the huge curved screen. The stereo surround sound was a little disappointing as the movie was shown in a Dolby Atmos house with a ton of double set surround speakers and ceiling speakers that did not come on much. I guess It was not shot with the Dolby Atmos system. Still a great film with some great background actors you don't see in movies these days.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 03-15-2016 04:54 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Martin McCaffery
The actual movie screams to be shot in 3-strip Technicolor. I don't know how it looked in 4k, but 2k is just not saturated enough.
Since it's exactly the same DCP, the colors ought not to look any different between a 2K and 4K presentation.

quote: Martin McCaffery
The Cohen's gave up on film one film too soon.
AFAIK, the movie was shot in Super 35 and did have a limited 35mm release, using film as intermediate. So, apparently the Coen broters haven't entirely given up film just yet.

quote: Terry Monohan
The stereo surround sound was a little disappointing as the movie was shown in a Dolby Atmos house with a ton of double set surround speakers and ceiling speakers that did not come on much. I guess It was not shot with the Dolby Atmos system.
This was no Atmos release and it limited the use of the surround speakers. I guess it wouldn't really have fitted the style of the movie anyway.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.