|
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Jurassic World (2015)
|
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.
Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004
|
posted 06-13-2015 01:32 PM
CINEMA: Fridley Palms 10, Muscatine, IA
AUDITORIUM: 1 (aka "XL")
PRESENTATION: NEC 4K Digital, Dolby ATMOS
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: Sound a bit stressed, but that seems to be the norm with ATMOS
RATING: Two stars (out of four)
This new Fridley plex has what has the be the biggest auditorium currently active in the circuit. Dubbed "XL", it carries a $2 premium on the ticket price. It's actually no bigger than a big Cinemark auditorium (even if it's not branded "XD", but for Fridley specifically, it's impressive.
THE PLOT: A theme park creates an exciting new attraction that happens to be alive and kind of an asshole. Wackiness ensues.
I saw the original movie at Dickinson's then new Southglen 12 in Kansas City, the closest place to hear DTS for the first time. I recall that they had a really nice aquarium built into the wall along the auditorium corridor and that the first five minutes of the film played with only the subwoofer working for sound. Southglen was short-lived with Dickinson thanks to stadium seating suddenly rendering it obsolete. Goodrich ran it for a few years after that. It's a gym or something now.
I didn't see any of the sequels ("The Lost World", "Jurassic Park III", "Jurassic Vegas Vacation", "Jurassic Dick: A Porn Parody", "War Games", "The Birds", "Godzilla", and "Sea World") and I'm told that's okay because the producers pretended like none of those ever existed.
Yeah, well, this one may as well never have either. This is a parts bin sequel that just borrows scenes from all of those and patches them together. Even, and especially, the movies I noted that weren't really Jurassic Park sequels.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mike Blakesley
Film God
Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 06-13-2015 01:54 PM
quote: Sam Graham
a parts bin sequel
That's a good phrase. I like that. We need to remember that one.
That said, I enjoyed this a great deal. While it's definitely a "check your brains at the door" movie, it's still a fun thrill ride. I thought it was one of the more intense sci-fi movies ever (for a PG-13 rating anyway), what with the kids almost getting killed and whatnot. It seemed to be only "thisfar" from R-rated territory in spots.
Chris Pratt did a fine job and is turning into the new Harrison Ford. He is a pretty amazing actor given what he's done on "Parks and Recreation" along with movies like this. He's a rare bird who can do goofy comedy and more serious action and pull both off.
Bryce Dallas Howard was good in the "keep the place open at all costs, fuck the possible disaster scenarios," mayor from Jaws role. And the two kid actors were very good as well.
I think I was expecting this to be another one of those bland, boring, way-over-the-top, Avengers-like 7-story-lines-at-once movies and it was not. It was a well paced thriller that delivered on its promises, so I predict big success. I loved the sound mix too - good use of the surround channels.
3.5 out of 5.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted 06-13-2015 06:43 PM
In 1993, Steven Spielberg unleashed Jurassic Park. With it's bar raising CGI and debuting DTS digital soundtrack it became a milestone in cinema history and an instant classic despite it's perfunctory script (albeit based on an intriguing premise). Followed by two redundant sequels, Jurassic World is the third redundant sequel.
That's not to say that Jurassic World is terrible - it's not - it's easily the second best of the franchise but it is yet another re-run of practically the same story. Again we have two children loose in a dinosaur park run amok while the park's controller (and relative of the children) attempts to retrieve them with the aid of a mercenary type.
The script throws all caution and common sense to the wind in ways that would never be allowed in the real world - how these two youngsters come to be adrift in a theme park full of prehistoric monsters defies belief! Jurassic Park gave a feasible explanation as to how this may happen but here it is just ridiculous.
In true Hollywood style, melodramatic plotlines are ramped up in haste for just about every character but ultimately lead nowhere leaving you wondering why they are there at all.
The film throws tired themes about of dangerous genetic tinkering and militarisation of technology and everything goes haywire largely due to ridiculously stupid decisions made by everybody from the owner of the park down to the two kids that will ultimately require rescuing.
The film's saving grace is, of course, the dinosaurs which are lovingly created in dangerous, growling detail in all their claws, teeth and reptilian eyes. Ever since King Kong all we've ever wanted to see is these prehistoric behemoths fight and we get plenty of that action here.
The film's other saving grace is Bryce Dallas Howard who is lovely in any guise. Doubtless others will think the same of Chris Pratt and I'm willing to pay that as well.
Ultimately, Jurassic World is just like Jurassic Park but "Bigger and Better™" with CGI and digital sound design which is now the norm for any Hollywood blockbuster. Let's be honest, this is a cash grab; it possesses neither the technical innovation nor the originality of storyline of the original. Jurassic Park nailed it; it still looks great; there was no imperative to remake it. But Jurassic World is fun enough and if the volume of popcorn left on the floor of the cinema after the movie is any indication, patrons are having a lot of fun indeed!
6 out of 10
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 06-15-2015 07:19 AM
quote: Jonathan Goeldner
I would assume the 65mm shot scenes were the long shots - which unfortunately because the DCP's are 2K - really negated the high resolution - and those shots of the island, trees, foliage etc., on the huge IMAX screen made the image look even worse - what was the point
From what I've read that was indeed the case. I still don't know why they bothered. In almost all of the island long shots, Universal Citywalk (I mean Jurassic World) was either added with CGI or had the New Orleans set superimposed on Hawaii (or a combination of both). Either way, they were going to lower the resolution anyway so why waste 65mm film on it?
If something is going to be shot on 65mm, even partially, it should be with the intension of a 70mm release and/or some kind of specialty 8k release (accomplished with 4 projectors precision stitched together). Even if they had managed to release in 4k for 2D, shooting on 65mm was pointless.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Marcel Birgelen
Film God
Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted 06-18-2015 04:43 PM
So, who dreamed up this 2:1 bollocks in a flat container? Really? My personal message to you: You should all be fired, because of gross incompetence. How much cash did you burn while creating this Jurassic semi-reboot?
"Those black bars you see, they are perfectly normal". Up yours, you bunch of amateurs.
So, you guessed it. I've seen it in the smallest possible way. The screen perfectly masked to flat and with black bars on top and the bottom. Thank you Universal, for this HD TV experience.
This movie felt like something I've seen before... Essentially a low quality reboot of the original, sprinkled with some Jaws and even a cameo of the prehistoric cousin of Shamu.
Humans are still ass holes and even after the dinos got medieval on their asses every episode before this one, we still haven't learned a bit. It must be chaos theory or something... time somebody builds a compensator thing for it.
quote: Michael Barry
Shooting in 65mm still carries benefits for 2k release.
Yeah, it pleases the egos of the director, cinematographers and cameramen. Now they should be put to work in some Chinese stink hole chemical plant, until they succeed to produce at least as much 65mm film stock with identical quality as they wasted.
Spoiler Alert - Click to Toggle
quote:
Where did all the people go before the climactic fight scene? There were 20,000 people there and they all just disappeared. Not one soul was seen once it got dark. I know that they were supposed to go indoors but where? There weren't that many buildings in the park and most of them were in the "Citywalk" area with windows.
They did have a ferry landing and this time, there wasn't a storm. So I guess, they could've taken the ferry back home to the dino-free zone?
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 06-19-2015 06:24 PM
Saw it in IMAX (LIEMAX) which is the only 3D presentation format, at least here in Brooklyn, that doesn't suck raptor ass. If nothing else and no matter what the suckiness of the 2K DCP, the dual projectors at the very least give a very bright image and for some reason, possibly because IMAX silver screens may not need to be as high gain as Real(dim) 3D, the hot spot is very mild and not as distressingly obvious as we were forced to endured in Regal's "premium" RPissX room in the same building.
The similarities with JP1 as noted above were painfully obvious and one similarity that you would think they would have amended for the better was the annoying and unsympathetic nature of the two brats in JP1. They were SO annoying, not only to me, but evidently to the entire audience that watched it with me back then in 1993, that when the two of them were being stalked by the raptors in the kitchen and the girl was hiding in the stainless steel cabinet, someone in the audience yelled out, "She's in the cabinet." I felt the same what about these too very unlikable boys, especially the older boy who was sulking and disagreeable for no apparent reason and his brother was just whiny. Halfway thru I would have not minded if they were just snatched up by any one of the beasts and never head from again.
Question: Can anyone tell me if there was a special IMAX version that included that one scene in which, in the background was reveiled a theatre marquee which showed THE IMAX EXPERIENCE logo? It was during the obligatory mass crowd running-like-chickens-without-their-heads scene (or chickens about to lose their heads)? Did that appear in the non-IMAX prints as well or just made specially for the IMAX version?
I agree, this thing really didn't need to be remade -- nothing new to see here...move on. Well, except if you are a Universal or Amblin stock holder - I am sure they would have a very different assessment as they stuff their new money into big lawn garbage bags).
The 3D conversion work was just about perfect, as almost any 3D conversion film nowadays seems to be -- no eye strain, no difficult convergence transitions from one shot to the next (easy to do with made-in-the-computer 3D) and with a nice feeling of deep infinity in many shots and a few nice in front of the screen compositions that were very comfortable.
All in all, I'd much rather have seen them do as equally enjoyable 3D conversion of the original for an anniversary release than wasting their time with this second rate, ho-hum product, but then, with 250 MILLION coming in in the first week, it's hard to argue with that kind of success, even if it was dog poo.
5/10 -- and at least half of that is for the impressive music score/orchestration which was very impressive and with a nice nod to J Williams too. Surprisingly, it sounded really good in whatever IMAX is doing nowadays (laser-aligned ass?) -- Atmos it's not...possibly 7.1? but it was distinct and very directional. Not bad for not Atmos.
And whatever you want to say about the merits or lack thereof of the thing, did you take a good look at the credit crawl? At the very least, you have to applaud how many people these mediocre titles employ; it looked like more people worked on this film than the entire population of Burbank.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
Home
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic