Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Mad Max: Fury Road (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Mad Max: Fury Road
Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 05-15-2015 09:31 PM      Profile for Geoff Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Geoff Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Harkins Northfield, Cine Capri auditorium, 2D
  • The image looked a bit soft. The focus on the end credits wasn't super sharp.
  • The audio was good, but not terrific. Like the picture, it never felt super crisp, and there were a few lines of dialog I strained to hear.
(Those are minor quibbles - it was a generally satisfying presentation)

I liked the movie and want to see it again, which is rare for me these days.
  • The action is over the top, but feels real.
  • Production Design is spectacular.
  • The script is lean and mean.
  • The score is great.
I liked the callbacks to the earlier films. They were nice without being overdone.
  • The appearance of the crows (a thematic element in MM).
  • I think one of the flashback frames (showing a skull) was straight out of MM.
  • Hardy wore the same leg brace and jacket that Gibson wore in TRW.
  • Hardy's long hair at the start was reminiscent of Gibson's in MM:BT.
Complaints:
  • The trailers show too much.
  • Immortan Joe was creepy, but he wasn't threatening enough.
  • I felt like something was held back in Immortan Joe's story arc at the end (trying to avoid spoilers).
See it on the big screen!

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 05-19-2015 10:57 AM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cinema: Harkins Theatres Bricktown 16
Screen: Cine Capri
Format: 2D, Dolby Atmos
Presentation Problems: Immortan Joe needs to enunciate
Rating: 3 stars out of 4

Mad Max: Fury Road is a movie I really hoped would deliver that "movie high" you get from seeing something really kick-ass, like the first time I saw Die Hard in 70mm. The 98% score on Rotten Tomatoes might have raised my expectations a little high.

Mad Max: Fury Road is a good movie and I do recommend it. But isn't a great, four star caliber movie.

I won't get into the plot details too much, other than wondering how this installment fits into the saga of previous Mad Max movies. Tom Hardy did a decent job of playing Max Rockatansky, but he doesn't have the same charisma as Mel Gibson had in the same role. It's a very understated performance. Charlize Theron, as Imperator Furiosa, had a lot more to work with from the script. Same goes for Nicholas Hoult as a dying "war boy" Nux. Many of the characters had interesting names, but many of those names are only given in the credits. Hugh Keays-Byrne was the primary bad guy, Toecutter in the original Mad Max movie. He is more scary (and gross) looking in this movie as Immortan Joe. Unfortunately the story doesn't let Immortan Joe flex enough muscles to be a scary villain.

The Road Warrior (aka Mad Mad 2) remains the best movie out of the Max series. It seemed like Mad Max: Fury Road was trying to recapture some of the same greatness of the 1982 surprise hit. I think it kept missing the mark because it was overdone in a number of areas and just downright implausible in others. At times the movie felt a little more like an installment of Riddick or even a parody of the original Mad Max movies. The obvious 3D-oriented gag that tops off the climactic chase was 100% parody.

One touch of detail I loved about the The Road Warrior was the scene early in the movie where Max uses a hub cap to collect precious gasoline dripping out of a truck. There are people just up the road who want to kill him, yet he is sponging up that fuel anyway.

Jump ahead to this movie and it seems like fuel isn't a problem. The highly modded vehicles have unlimited gasoline and some of the characters have unlimited ammo. The world in Mad Max: Fury Road is visually apocalyptic looking in style. But its reality doesn't seem as desperate like a real apocalypse would.

I loved how most of the vehicles and motorcycles were real and the many of the stunts were real. Even though many of the vehicles and other elements of the production design were built, rather than CGI modeled, I couldn't help wondering where people in a post-nuclear apocalypse would find all the resources to build those things. Unfortunately so many other stylistic touches were layered on top of that to make the end result still feel like a CGI cartoon rather than reality. Fireballs color graded to brilliant red do look cool, but they also remind me I'm just watching a movie.

Last week David Christopher Bell posted this article at Cracked about why modern CGI looks surprisingly crappy. It's more than just the CGI, even when some of the CGI is really crappy, rushed and done by the lowest bidding firm. A bunch of it bleeds over into the story writing, editing, application of style over substance and almost complete abandonment of the story telling principals needed to get audiences to suspend disbelief.

BTW, I did watch this movie in Dolby Atmos. I was thankful the Bricktown 16 theater didn't stick Pitch Perfect 2 in the big auditorium, even though it strangely made a lot more money this past weekend. Mad Max: Fury Road had a pretty decent Atmos mix. The surrounds kicked in the most for the voices going on in Max' head. Lots of crazy surround positioning there.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 05-19-2015 11:40 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
what I found interesting about the Atmos mix, is that the bass isn't jacked up to '11' but is used at select key moments - and on the Arclight Bethesda system, they are tonal, tight and resonate.

After seeing this, I immediately wanted to stay and see it again - loved it!

I also thought Stereo D's 3D conversion work looked really good, (not great, since a lot of the action happens so fast), but there are so many instances when things are propelled at your face, it made me dodge my head slightly.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 05-24-2015 04:07 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Cinemark Oakley Station and XD, Cincinnati, OH
AUDITORIUM: 2
PRESENTATION: Mystery Meat Digital
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: No set masking (I don't think there's any masking equipment installed to begin with)
RATING: Three and one half stars (out of four)

MEANWHILE AT THE SELF-SERVE CONCESSION STAND: What's THIS? A Mr. Pibb label? Not Pibb XTRA? Could they POSSIBLY have ORIGINAL MR. PIBB?

**fills large cup**

Wow. Yes they do.

**guzzles half the cup and tops off...cashier glares disapprovingly**

THE PLOT: A harem escapes. Wackiness ensues.

I'm not a fan of the post apocalyptic genre. My experience with such is basically limited to the music videos for Scandal's "The Warrior" and Kiss's "All Hell's Breaking Loose". I have never seen a Mad Max movie. But the reviews for this have been so great, I had to see it. And I was not disappointed.

I have no desire to see it again, and it's not suddenly going to make me a fan of the genre, but this is an amazing spectacle.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 05-25-2015 08:11 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Sam Graham
MEANWHILE AT THE SELF-SERVE CONCESSION STAND: What's THIS? A Mr. Pibb label? Not Pibb XTRA? Could they POSSIBLY have ORIGINAL MR. PIBB?
Didn't Mr. Pibb (the original) go extinct somewhere in 2001? Just like most of the humans, animals and plants in this movie?

Maybe Immortan Joe pumped up some from his personal Aqua Pibb?

 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 05-28-2015 08:22 PM      Profile for Geoff Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Geoff Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Customer Questions and Customer Reviews for Wilton Silver Color Mist at Amazon are a hoot.

quote:
Oh what a spray! What a lovely spray!
quote:
Will this spray allow my brothers to WITNESS ME better?
And many, many more...

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 06-10-2015 06:32 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Great flic. Glad I went to see it. Completely over the top, but not annoying like that Michael Bay trash.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 06-10-2015 10:34 PM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I mostly wondered how George Miller sleeps at night will all of these visions in his head.
I think I came into the movie over prepared. Not like when I originally saw Road Warrior, so lost the element of surprise.
Just an astonishingly well made movie, even if it doesn't achieve transcendence.
For whatever reason, died pretty badly in this town.

 |  IP: Logged

Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 06-14-2015 11:14 PM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A very enjoyable movie. Marvel movies could take some lessons in stunts.
My only quibbles
1) It didn't have that crazy no holds barred Australian characters. Theron is just a mainstream female action heroine who inexplicably uses an American accent in the movie(she is not even American, so what is the motivation to use that accent?). She did a very solid job, but she was a little too mainstream for this kind of movie.
2) Hardy doesn't have the same kind of dangerous vibe you can get from a Mel Gibson in Road Warrior. Still not bad.
3) Nicholous Hoult did a good job with the role and fit right in.

Still, a damn enjoyable movie. It's a pity , in Atlanta, it was taken out of the premium large screen formats after only a week. With digital, why not screen share some of the showings in IMAX and RPX with the newer movies at least on weekdays?

The guitar playing guy with all the speakers was a hilarious visual even if it was a throwback to an earlier era.

The last Fast and Furious movie could have used a similar type chase scene instead of being an action movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Carol May
Film Handler

Posts: 48
From: los angeles, ca, usa
Registered: Nov 2006


 - posted 06-17-2015 02:15 PM      Profile for Carol May   Email Carol May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just saw half of Mad Max at the Pacific Theaters at The Grove (Farmers Market). Three people present for a 10:10am Wednesday show.

Yes, this new MM channeled the original, but I'm no longer in the right demographic. An hour (presumably 2 hours, but I left) of non-stop chase, nearly non-stop, loud, violent. I went to see Charlize Theron save the world, I'll trust that she did just that, but my head was buzzing too much to stay.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 06-17-2015 03:07 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There was a break right after you left where your ears get a break. I was getting kind of fatigued and then got through the plot thickening part and then on to the final act. Loved in both 2D and 3D.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-29-2016 12:42 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
So I didn't bother writing a review of this movie back when it came out. I was going to leave well enough alone, but now that this shittastical movie has just won a bunch of Oscars, I am compelled to post my review.

Edit - Ok so I'm having trouble compiling enough negativity into my review to truly express my opinion of what a piece of crap this movie was, so instead I'm going to borrow some words for this review from the late Roger Ebert (and the IMDB).

A woman rebels against a tyrannical ruler in postapocalyptic Australia in search for her home-land with the help of a group of female prisoners, a psychotic worshipper, and a drifter named Max. That's the setup for one of the most thouroughly hateful movie of recent years. A movie that makes me cringe even when I'm sitting here thinking about it.

I hated this movie as much as any movie I've ever reviewed in the 40'ish years I've been watching movies. I had to think a long time to pick my worst picture of 2015, about a tenth of a second, and it's Mad Max Fury Road.

I hated this movie. Hated hated hated hated hated this movie. Hated it. Hated every simpering stupid vacant audience-insulting moment of it. Hated the sensibility that thought anyone would like it. Hated the implied insult to the audience by its belief that anyone would be entertained by it.


Thank you for the use of your words Roger. You said it better than I was able to.

0 out of 5 stars

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-29-2016 02:13 AM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I finally watched Mad Max: Fury Road about a week ago and I didn't care for it at all. My response wasn't nearly as negative as Brad's, but I didn't like it. Every now and there is a movie the critics really respond to and I can't understand why. Mad Max is one of those.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-29-2016 03:42 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had never seen it except for the trailer, and the clips shown during the Oscars. It's just not my kind of movie, I guess - the clips just put me off. I'm more of a comedy guy, I guess.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 02-29-2016 03:46 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While I don't know that I quite agree with Mr. Ebert (because, you know, I can appreciate the idea that others enjoy things I'm simply not into), I completely agree with Justin. I just do not, and likely never will, see what all the hype is about. I'd say it was about the most boring film I've ever seen. But that's because I don't care for car chases and such. The only reason I saw it was because I was looking for a presentation issue that was reported to me. I know that I would not have seen it otherwise, because I knew going into it that it wasn't my thing. I had hoped I would at least find the story interesting, but that never happened.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.