my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Cinderella (2015)

Author Topic: Cinderella (2015) Mike Blakesley Film God Posts: 12767 From: Forsyth, Montana Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-19-2015 03:35 PM                        This is a movie with a controversy around it, and what a stupid controversy it is. I've read a few reviews slamming Disney for not "empowering" Cinderella more, or not making the Prince a "person of color," or other crap like that. COME ON YOU IDIOTS, it is a fairy tale adaptation, not a sociological documentary. I don't know why Disney is now expected to be 100% diverse with every project they do. This is a movie that's supposed to take place in the 1600s, not contemporary America. Disney can't win on these kinds of things, apparently....if they screw with the story like they did in Maleficent, they get slammed for screwing with a classic; but if they stay true to the story, they get slammed for not being innovative. Anyway, on to the movie. I was surprised by how much I liked it. The 1950 animated movie has never been one of my top 10 faves, EXCEPT for the sequence near the end with the mice having the impossible job of getting the key to Cinderella's tower up the stairs...and then running into Lucifer the cat at the top. That's gotta be one of the most harrowing scenes (for a kid) in any of the Disney classics, right up there with the forest chase in Snow White or the dragon scene in Sleeping Beauty or the wildebeest chase in The Lion King or the forest fire scene in Bambi. In this movie, though, the mice are secondary players (thankfully) and the story focuses on the humans, where it belongs. Along with most reviewers, my favorite part of the show was the production itself. Since they didn't use any superstar names in the cast, the budget is all on the screen in the form of very lavish production values. The palace/ballroom scene, in particular, is spectacular. The magical segments are handled with great humor and heart, too. The costumes are pretty amazing, and this is from a guy who doesn't really get into analyzing costume design. Cinderella was everything you would expect Cinderella to look like, and her step-family was suitably ugly/ridiculous looking. (The prince's pants were too tight, although some people might find that appealing I guess!) The story was pretty much the standard Cinderella story we are all familiar with, but it was handled in such a way that we actually understand a bit of the motivation behind why she was treated the way she was. I also enjoyed the musical score, especially the songs at the end of the show. Very well done. Bottom line, it was great to see Disney do one of these re-imaginings without trying to re-invent the wheel, for once. The Frozen short at the beginning was exceptionally cute and very well done (and has a maddenly catchy song), but it's not a groundbreaker like we've come to expect from Disney's pre-feature shorts. It has been cool to stand in the back of the auditorium and hear kids saying the various characters' names as they appear on screen. Cinderella: 4 out of 5 Frozen Fever: 3 out of 5  |  IP: Logged Stu Jamieson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 524 From: Buccan, Qld, Australia Registered: Jan 2008 posted 04-11-2015 06:11 PM                     Cinderella is so "Disney" it almost hurts. (Cinder)Ella is so wholesome as to be almost beyond belief. Her step-mother and sisters are evil beyond redemption. And the prince is handsome and honourable beyond reproach. None of this is unexpected, of course - Disney is as Disney does and it's perfect little girl fodder, complete with doe-eyed innocence and glittery flouncy dresses. And it's all shot with an impossible beauty that can only be achieved on a perfectly lit studio set. Nothing is a surprise - the goodies get their fairy tale ending and the baddies get their just desserts. It's just all so very......"nice". Without being remarkable in any way, it pushes all the right buttons and duly hits all the appropriate marks. No one will go home disappointed but neither will anyone go home completely wowed. The standalone pinnacle of the film is Helena Bonham Carter's scene-stealing turn as the fairy godmother which is just fabulous in every way. The rest of the cast, which includes Cate Blanchett and Stellan Skarsgård, play strictly by the numbers - again, not disappointing just unremarkable. Cinderella is completely harmless holiday fare which, at the very least, will be a welcome relief from endless rewatches of Barbie DVDs at home. 6 out of 10  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Goeldner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1360 From: Washington, District of Columbia Registered: Jun 2008 posted 04-11-2015 09:12 PM                     as my sister noted: "it's pretty" ... "and?" I retorted ... "just pretty" having seen the trailer - I think it covered and showed me the entire movie.  |  IP: Logged Frank Cox Film God Posts: 2234 From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada Registered: Apr 2011 posted 04-17-2015 03:00 AM                        This is another movie that I can honestly say, I enjoyed the hell out of it! What a wonderful, feel-good movie. If you don't walk out of the theatre with a smile, you weren't paying attention. The best scene is chase where the coach is turning back into a pumpkin. It's just downright exciting! I loved to see her sitting there surrounded by all of those seeds -- my first thought was, "I wonder how she's going to get out of the pumpkin." And boy, she did get out in the most spectacular fashion. Dandy movie. I agree with Mike, though -- the prince's pants were definitely too tight.  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 04-17-2015 04:33 AM                     quote: Mike Blakesley COME ON YOU IDIOTS, it is a fairy tale adaptation, not a sociological documentary. I don't know why Disney is now expected to be 100% diverse with every project they do. This is a movie that's supposed to take place in the 1600s, not contemporary America. Disney can't win on these kinds of things, apparently....if they screw with the story like they did in Maleficent, they get slammed for screwing with a classic; but if they stay true to the story, they get slammed for not being innovative. Next time Disney creates a new Cinderella adaptation I challenge them to make Cinderella a Latino lesbian.  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Goeldner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1360 From: Washington, District of Columbia Registered: Jun 2008 posted 04-18-2015 08:12 PM                     ^ THAt I'd see ...  |  IP: Logged Connor Wilson Expert Film Handler Posts: 190 From: Sterling, VA, USA Registered: Jan 2011 posted 04-19-2015 05:00 PM                     Also, the Prince in this adaptation is Korean, and is gender fluid, which means he (or she, or xhe, or zhe) can shift his (or her) gender identity from one to the next. It just so happens on Tuesdays he is a lesbian princess.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 05-03-2015 11:52 PM                        I once wrote an April fool on an email discussion list. It described an upcoming remake of Snow White, to be directed by Tarantino and with a script by Bruce LaBruce. Snow White was to be voiced by Paris Hilton, the wicked witch by Pam Greer and prince by Ving Rhames. The film was to have contained several gruesome and prolonged scenes of sado-massochism involving the dwarves, and a soundtrack featuring expletive-laden, violence-glorifying gangsta rap. I was staggered by how many people fell for it, and complained about the desecration of a classic, robbing children of their innocence, etc. etc. quote: Mike Blakesley ...but it was handled in such a way that we actually understand a bit of the motivation behind why she was treated the way she was. Agreed: furthermore, the "showdown" scene between Cinderella and Kate Blanchett was handled in a way that would probably enable older kids to get it, too. My only slight reservation about the film was that there were virtually no jokes pitched mainly at adults in the audience, and for a show like this (there are likely to be lots of adults in the audience, because it's aimed at kids who are too young to go by themselves) you do need some of them.  |  IP: Logged Steve Wilson Expert Film Handler Posts: 109 From: Paoli, IN, USA Registered: May 2004 posted 05-11-2015 01:18 AM                        I thought Cinderella was as good as a Dinsey picture gets. Walt Disney himself would be so very proud of this film and we cannot say taht too much about what is left of Walts legacy these days. It had his touch because it was mainly a copy of the original.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.