Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Rio 2

   
Author Topic: Rio 2
Frank Cox
Film God

Posts: 2234
From: Melville Saskatchewan Canada
Registered: Apr 2011


 - posted 05-04-2014 11:49 PM      Profile for Frank Cox   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Cox   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Rio 2 is just ok, but it's not nearly as good as the first Rio, which I like quite a lot.

Gabby the Poisonous Frog is by far the best character in this movie next to Blu himself. The babysitting scene with Tiny at the beginning is a hoot, too.

They really went out of their way to try to drag all of the supporting characters from the first movie into this one.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 05-07-2014 04:45 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I share your opinion, this movie was "just OK". The last one might not have been as great as Pixar in its heydays but it was funny and also connected on an emotional level (read: you went all soft afterwards).

quote: Frank Cox
They really went out of their way to try to drag all of the supporting characters from the first movie into this one.
And it didn't do them any good. Nigel, the main antagonist of the last installment became just a byline in this one.

It looks like BlueSky is trying to diversify themselves from their somewhat one-trick-pony called Ice Age. Unfortunately, their Rio franchise falls flat on their second attempt. And unfortunately, their Ice Age franchise primarily coasts from one funny cut-scene, involving their nut-driven version of Wile E. Coyote called Scrat, to the other,

To me it looks like their 3D tech has sufficiently evolved to compete with Pixar and Dreamworks Animation on the highest level, but story-wise, there are still some gaps to fill.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-07-2014 05:44 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Agreed on all counts.

I wonder why they always think it's necessary to bring back ALL of the supporting characters even if the storyline would be better off with different characters? Heck, Indiana Jones proved that 30 years ago.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.