Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Under the Skin (2014)

   
Author Topic: Under the Skin (2014)
Sam Graham
AKA: "The Evil Sam Graham". Wackiness ensues.

Posts: 1431
From: Waukee, IA
Registered: Dec 2004


 - posted 05-03-2014 06:36 PM      Profile for Sam Graham   Author's Homepage   Email Sam Graham   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CINEMA: Cinemarkury 16 Suncoast, Las Vegas, NV
AUDITORIUM: 7
PRESENTATION: Mystery Meat Digital (2K)
PRESENTATION PROBLEMS: LF channel seemed to be at least partially out
RATING: Two and one half stars (out of four)

Finding a multiplex buried in a casino that provides no directional signs for it is always an adventure. Just saying.

THE PLOT: A girl lures boys into her goo. Wackiness ensues.

This is a slow-moving thriller that relies on visuals more than dialogue to tell its story. Good thing too, since this is set in Scotland and most of the characters speak with an accent thick enough that, had this been a Food Network program, they would have subtitled it.

Anyway, it works. The story unfolds nicely. But a lot of people are going to find this boring as hell.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 05-04-2014 04:58 PM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
But you managed to actually see it!

The distribution of this movie surely is a mess. The local distributor cannot even tell me when the movie will finally be available for release around here...

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 05-22-2014 11:48 AM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I personally liked the slow pacing of the film - it added an extra sense of creepiness.

surprised this got an R-rating, since a couple male characters/victims are *ahem* fully aroused.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-23-2014 08:28 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We're running two screenings of it on 12 June with Adam Pearson doing a Q&A at the evening one. The trailer looks weird.

 |  IP: Logged

Victor Liorentas
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 800
From: london ontario canada
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 05-23-2014 01:17 PM      Profile for Victor Liorentas   Email Victor Liorentas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Running it right now.
We got a bad review in today's paper which wont help it.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Goeldner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1360
From: Washington, District of Columbia
Registered: Jun 2008


 - posted 05-26-2014 11:33 PM      Profile for Jonathan Goeldner   Email Jonathan Goeldner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Victor Liorentas
Running it right now.
We got a bad review in today's paper which wont help it.

thankfully the Washington Post gave it a rave review and an overall 3 and half stars (out of four)

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 10-20-2014 05:04 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So, someone finally decided to release this movie around here. Being a primarily British production, it's still rather strange it took forever to cross the channel. Maybe the disk arrived as "message-in-a-bottle"? Yeah, this surely isn't your main stream, in your face, Hollywood production. But with a bankable star like Scarlett Johansson, going fully nude for the first time, you would expect a bit more... homogenous release.

The local art house, which is usually packed to the brim, features all the crappy entourage you'd expect. They're at times pulling in more customers than the local multiplexes, even ask more for a ticket, but they still pride themselves in ghettoness all the way: tiny and small, unmasked, common width screens with way to big perforations. Legroom you say? Ventilation? Air-CONDITIONING?! And you know, those surrounds are just for decoration, didn't you? The Scottish accent was made even more unintelligible by the total lack of high frequencies, as if the center speaker was hooked up via long distance phone call from the 70s. But at least we got subtitles, even although there was no cooking involved [Wink] .

Never having read the book this was based on, I went to this movie without any pre-set expectations. From what I know now, the book and the movie are quite different beasts and the movie is just "inspired by" and not "based upon".

It's certainly not a movie that takes your hand and tells the story for you. What's actually going on is pretty much left for your own interpretation.

The plot: Humanoid looking alien girl(?) is sent to earth to replace previous alien girl. Her primary task seems to be luring men into some kind of trap, primarily using her looks. Exactly why they're being "harvested" isn't made clear. Is it for their skin? Or are there other purposes?

During her quest, she encounters a man with an extreme facial disfigurement. She decides to let him live and enters a quest for something akin "self-recognition"...

Although I did actually like the concept, personally, I found the pacing to be somewhat slow. Maybe because I don't need three minutes of exposition to get a point across. Although it was clearly not the intention of the movie makers, I would've liked some more profound background regarding this alien race and their intentions for example.

All in all not a bad movie, but if you're easily offended by some explicit pictures or easily bored, probably not for you.

P.S.: The title lists this as a 2014 release, it was actually already produced and "released" back in 2013.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.