Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Non-Stop

   
Author Topic: Non-Stop
Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 03-01-2014 06:38 PM      Profile for Stu Jamieson   Email Stu Jamieson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An alcoholic air marshal (Liam Neeson) on a long-haul Atlantic flight is TXTed a demand from an on-board terrorist to deposit $150M into a bank account within 20 minutes or someone on the plane dies. If the 20 minute countdown runs out, the cycle starts again, and again until the demands are met. It's a simple premise but a highly effective one, resulting in a series of 20 minute nail biters set within the confined space of an aircraft. And who better to negotiate these proceedings than mature, solid, kick-ass Neeson?

In the last decade Neeson has set himself up as a contemporary Charles Bronson - a tough, rugged, ageing scrapper, well-intentioned but always finding himself a reluctant adversary to evil. And who can complain when, like Bronson, he's so good at it. That he's a fine actor also further adds to his appeal. And speaking of fine actors, Julianne Moore's inclusion in the cast is an odd but very welcome addition.

The films climax, however, is a little over-dramatic being too incredible to be believed, even in movie land. To finish the film on this note is entirely unnecessary given that the finely-tuned tension was already at it's peak; the attempt to stretch the tension further with implausible action and an unlikely conclusion merely pushes the credibility of the picture over the line. But thankfully it's not enough to shadow the greatness which came before and so, overall, it remains a very good show.

8 out of 10

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 03-03-2014 11:09 PM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This was a good Liam Neeson movie. It was less twist and more turns and I wasn't sure who was going to turn out to be the bad guy. It was refreshing to see Neeson as an alcoholic and then he breaks the law by smoking a few times in the planes washroom.

I liked the bad-ass ending with Neeson floating through the air.

I had a great time watching Non-Stop, I totally recommend it.

 |  IP: Logged

Stu Jamieson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 524
From: Buccan, Qld, Australia
Registered: Jan 2008


 - posted 03-04-2014 12:51 AM      Profile for Stu Jamieson   Email Stu Jamieson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My biggest criticism of it would be how he was exonerated of his supposed crimes within 5secs of landing. It should have ended with him being led away in cuffs. And the final action sequence pushed a little too far even though the flying gun fight was kind of cool. Other than that, I think this is pretty great.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 03-04-2014 01:59 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Fair enough Stu, but we gotta cut the guy a break LOL, Neeson did fly backwards, in-slow mo, at 8000 feet with a hole in the side of the plane while shooting the bad guy. I liked how it was a quick, tidy ending without a come back from the plane crash dead or a big twist in the final scenes.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 03-19-2014 06:04 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It still feels pretty weird seeing this movie on the same day that a big airliner of roughly the same size seems to completely vanish off the earth in real life...

I agree with Stu, that last part wasn't really necessary. Besides that, the landing partly looked like the CGI you would be proud of in the late 90s, but managed primarily in giving the whole thing a cheap feel.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 03-29-2014 12:30 AM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While some of the story is pretty preposterous as some here have said, I still found this to be a terrific thrill ride of a movie. I've always wished there could be a remake of "Airport" done a little less cheesy, and this is probably the closest thing we're ever going to get to it. It's a similar basic story (mad bomber on the plane) with all the sub-plots taken out.

There are plot holes big enough to drive a 747 through and the slam-bang ending is over the top, but it's a white knuckle ride all the same.

Liam Neeson has turned into a very reliable action hero. He probably doesn't have too many more years left before he becomes the next Harrison Ford, but for now he usually means a good time at the movies.

3.5 out of 5 stars from me. Would have been 4 stars if they had just toned down the ending a little and made it less ridiculous.

A side note and an eerie case of art-imitates-life: The scene where the plane takes a sudden dive and various people are thrown in the air....a similar situation happened just outside of Billings, Montana a few weeks ago. A United Airlines flight (a Boeing 737) headed for Billings encountered "severe clear air turbulence" and just dropped out of the air for several hundred feet. It recovered and landed safely, but not without a bunch of injuries: One guy who happened to not be wearing a seatbelt was thrown all the way to the ceiling of the plane and had severe head trauma, and three of the flight crew (who of course weren't belted in) wound up in the hospital.

Billings Gazette article

 |  IP: Logged

Pravin Ratnam
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 844
From: Atlanta, GA,USA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 04-01-2014 10:25 PM      Profile for Pravin Ratnam   Email Pravin Ratnam   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
First half was fun and tense. Movie is never boring. But damn, as others have said, the final act just disappoints. I will go forward and say the ending flat out sucked. Whoever ends up being the bad people just does not jibe with the mind games the villain is playing with neeson at the beginning. I wish they rewrote who they chose to be villains.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.