Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit

   
Author Topic: Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit
Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 01-21-2014 03:16 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was the Sunday evening show at the Big House at a local theater. It was virtually deserted, seating only a handful of people, including me and my girlfriend. I must be honest, there wasn't a huge deal of excitement see this movie either, we counted our chances and those of a misfire were rated higher. The presentation itself, although, went down flawlessly.

For those who forgot who Jack Ryan is: It's a staple Tom Clancy character, being featured in many books and filmed adaptations. He's so good at being a hero, he even deserves to be in the title...

This movie although, is not based on a Tom Clancy book, it's just another reboot, using the Jack Ryan character in a modern setting as background.

He, our hero, is a seemingly bright PhD student, but after witnessing the 9/11 attacks, he decides it's time to do something for his country so he enlists. After almost being shot to pieces in Afghanistan, he falls in love with his rehabilitation physician. Jack decides that he always wanted to be an analyst, but who wouldn't be convinced to join the CIA as undercover agent if Kevin Costner himself invited you to do so?

The script is just standard 13-in-a-dozen Hollywood fare: Car chase: check, unbelievable computer hacking: check, cliched love story: check, I could go on for a while... It must have been lying around, catching dust somewhere since the mid 90's. After being rediscovered during one of the last Spring cleanings, it must have been passed to some of the most mediocre screenwriters with the task of resetting this thing in a "contemporary setting".

Chris Pine might be a somewhat believable James T. Kirk Jr., but he sure isn't as believable as some kind of undercover CIA agent. His single-dimensionally written character probably also doesn't help.

On a side-note: The cinematography also sucks. This movie switches from soft, grainy 35mm shots to razor sharp digital ones in the blink of an eye and also throws a lot of unnecessary shaky cam in the mix.

 |  IP: Logged

Terry Lynn-Stevens
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1081
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Dec 2012


 - posted 01-21-2014 09:32 AM      Profile for Terry Lynn-Stevens   Email Terry Lynn-Stevens   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the movie, was good for the first hour and then it all fell apart in the last 30 minutes. I can see why the movie was dumped into the January time slot.

I saw the movie in Dolby Atmos, or did I? It was advertised in Dolby Atmos with immersive sound and crystal clear digital images in a custom designed auditorium that some might call perfection but Cineplex in fact calls it Ultra AVX. The movie was wonderfully presented with no masking which sucked as usual but I am getting use to it so I am starting to not really care about it anymore.

Chris Pine was not very good as Jack Ryan. This might of been the first time I have seen the director play the bad guy in a movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 01-21-2014 11:28 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
I saw the movie in Dolby Atmos, or did I?
The movie doesn't have an Atmos track...

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-17-2014 10:21 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I watched about 30 seconds of this movie tonight (the last part of the high-speed scene at the end). Chris Pine rolling out of the back of a van going at least 60 mph and coming up with no more than a "dazed look" was enough to tell me this is just another one of those ridiculous, over-the-top, physics-ignoring, eardrum-busting noise-fests. So that was enough for me.

quote: Terry Lynn-Stevens
The movie was wonderfully presented with no masking
Well there's a statement that contradicts itself.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.