my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » The Master

Author Topic: The Master Stu Jamieson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 524 From: Buccan, Qld, Australia Registered: Jan 2008 posted 11-17-2012 05:39 PM                     Nobody's seen this yet? Are you folk ill? Every year there's at least one film which is critically acclaimed to a high degree which you look at and wonder where the merits are. Paul Thomas Anderson's The Master is that film for me. Maybe it's that bromance films just don't appeal to me for this is, in essence, what this film is. In my opinion PTA's films see-saw alternately between brilliance and relative boredom. Boogie Nights and Punch Drunk Love are fabulous films but their follow-ups, Magnolia and There Will Be Blood, while punctuated by brilliant performances, failed to go anywhere particularly interesting. The latter two films, in conjunction with The Master, form a triptych of projects where father-son relationships are core to the proceedings and, perhaps because I have no like issues of my own, this is something I simply cannot relate to in any profound way. The intended direction of the film is bewildering, to say the least. After 2+ hours of Lancaster Dodd (Philip Seymour Hoffman) spruiking quasi-religious nonsense and Freddie Quell (Joaquin Phoenix) behaving in an unpredictable manner, it's unclear what the point of the story actually is. No character arcs seem to develop; every character finishes the film much as they started. Quell is still a recalcitrant drunk and Dodd remains a loopy self-righteous predator. Admittedly the performances are good but we expect nothing less from this troupe and none are exemplary with respect to their own canon of work. Personally, I would have preferred Phoenix to channel Daniel Day-Lewis a little less. This is a film to appeal to the Paul Thomas Anderson die-hards only. 4 out of 10.  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Goeldner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1360 From: Washington, District of Columbia Registered: Jun 2008 posted 12-01-2012 10:45 PM                     this was worse than 'There Will be Blood' which came across as pompus. why was this even filmed in 70mm? beats me?  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.