Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Paul (2011)

   
Author Topic: Paul (2011)
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-09-2011 12:36 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Paul" is basically an attempt to apply the "Superbad" template to the "E.T." story. The only real difference is that Paul (the alien) doesn't act like an alien; he just looks a little weird and has some extraordinary powers (well, not extraordinary if you've seen any other sci-fi movie ever made). He's foul-mouthed, smokes dope, can turn invisible by holding his breath, and has E.T.'s ability to heal injuries and bring dead creatures back to life. And, rather than innocent kids, our heroes here are two innocent child-like dudes who just came from ComicCon and have formed all their notions about aliens from reading comic books.

It's a typical get-E.T.-home type of story that was done better in "E.T." and "Starman."

Surprisingly, most of the best laughs in this originate from the supporting characters. Especially two bumbling "agents" of some government agency that's trying to capture Paul. And Jeffrey Tambor hilariously reprises his Hank Kingsley character from "The Larry Sanders Show" except here, he's an arrogant self-aggrandizing science fiction writer instead of an arrogant self-aggrandizing talk show sidekick.

It's kind of fun to point out the movies that virtually everything is ripped off from. There's Sigourney's classic line from "Aliens" (used on her this time), and there's the never-ending Star Wars-ish spacecraft flyover, first parodied about a hundred years ago in one of those Zucker Bros. sci-fi comedy ripoffs, and the entire ending is copped from E.T. (with all of the pathos left out).

Having said all of that, I have to say that the movie was enjoyable to watch for some strange reason, even though I knew what was going to happen pretty much throughout the whole thing. Oh, and they put the two funniest bits from the movie in the trailers.....idiots.

Overall, I will say three out of five stars from me.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Gallimore
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 108
From: Willis, Virginia, USA
Registered: Jul 2009


 - posted 05-18-2011 09:39 PM      Profile for Tony Gallimore   Email Tony Gallimore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You pretty much covered it Mike! Even though it was predictable, it was great for a few laughs.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.