my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » The Wolfman (2009)

Author Topic: The Wolfman (2009) Joe Tommassello Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 547 From: Coatesville, PA, USA Registered: Jan 2008 posted 02-18-2010 10:13 PM                  Universal owns werewolf movies. There are three that have stood out in my opinion. First is the original "Wolf Man" with Lon Chaney, the second was technically a Hammer film but Uni co-financed it via their US distribution deal..."Curse of the Werewolf", and third was John Landis' "American Werewolf in London". Now we can add a fourth one to the list... "The Wolfman" borrows liberally from all three of it's Universal-released predecessors and the result is an enjoyable if unremarkable horror thriller in the classic tradition. It is fortunate that the filmmakers avoided the comic book direction they took with "Van Helsing". The plot and characters start out solidly as in the original Curt Siodmak screenplay from the '41 version and it's visual style seems greatly influenced by the 1963 Hammer film. In fact it looks like the kind of film Hammer would have produced had they made it themselves. Benicio Del Toro's better-than-adequate performance seems - either by chance or design - to encompass the best aspects of both Chaney and Oliver Reed's interpretations. There are also a few similarities to "American Werewolf..." not the least of which is excellent makeup effects by Rick Baker (who is featured in a quick cameo). It would be great to see him win another makeup effects Oscar to keep company with the first one ever given out. Thanks to whomever made the decision to reinstate the fine Danny Elfman score rather than subject us to the techno-shit music that appeared in one of the trailers. The remaining cast - Anthony Hopkins, Emily Blunt and Hugo Weaving in particular - are all predictably good. In short if you are a fan of werewolf movies and like what you saw in the trailers you are likely to enjoy "The Wolfman". It isn't going to blow you away but it is an effective horror thriller that will keep you entertained from start to finish.  |  IP: Logged Mitchell Dvoskin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1869 From: West Milford, NJ, USA Registered: Jan 2001 posted 02-21-2010 12:02 PM                     Basically, I agree with Joe Tommassello's review. However, I did not care for the CGI generated/enhanced sets, although I did like the man to wolf transformations. I also am a stickler for films staying in period. The film was clearly set in Victorian England, pre automobiles, yet the antique shop in London had electric lights when nowhere else in the film had electric lighting.  |  IP: Logged Claude S. Ayakawa Film God Posts: 2738 From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 06-01-2010 04:32 PM                        I never saw THE WOLFMAN (2009) in a theatre but will watch it tonight in the comfort of my home on a Blu-Ray disc I had picked up at a Blockbuster store as part of my Online/In Store rental service plan. I grew p with the original Lon Chaney and Hammer films and look forward to watching the current film tonight. I used to love horror films very much including john Carpenter's original HALLOWEEN but I no longer watch the current stuff because they have become too gory. Thank God, the current WOLFMAN film is not a modern version of that classic film with a lot of unnecessary bloody scenes. -Claude  |  IP: Logged Joe Tommassello Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 547 From: Coatesville, PA, USA Registered: Jan 2008 posted 06-11-2010 10:57 AM                  Claude - I am curious as to your opinion since seeing the film. To anyone planning to watch this at home I recommend the Theatrical Version. The "unrated" version might as well have been the "workprint" version as it simply seems not edited enough. It's the kind of footage that belongs in the supplemental materials rather than dragging out the first act with ten unneccesary minutes. If there was any material beyond the first 20 minutes that was added it didn't stand out to me. Perhaps someone else here knows if there was anything later in the film.  |  IP: Logged Claude S. Ayakawa Film God Posts: 2738 From: Waipahu, Hawaii, USA Registered: Aug 2002 posted 06-11-2010 01:24 PM                        Joe, It is very interesting you had asked me what I thought of THE WOOLFMAN because I was planning to post my comments after watching the movie on a rented Blu Ray disc from Blockbuster. I never did because I got busy. The original has been a favorite ever since I saw it for the very first time in a theatre when I was a little boy. I was hoping I would enjoy this remake very much but I did not. I thought it was very boring and decided to turn it off after I had watched it for about an hour and fifteen minutes. I did not watch the theatrical version but the directors cut. Do you think that was probably the reason I did not enjoy the film? Perhaps I should watch it again but the theatrical version the next time. -Claude  |  IP: Logged Joe Tommassello Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 547 From: Coatesville, PA, USA Registered: Jan 2008 posted 06-11-2010 01:49 PM                  Claude- As you can see from my original review I liked the film when I saw it in the theater. While watching the extended version it felt slow. The extra 16 minutes of footage didn't help it at all. Most of it was in the first 20 minutes of the film. Primarily the whole scene in London before he goes home was entirely new and the scene in the pub is longer. I am sure there are others too but those stick in my mind. If you watch it longer - on the extended version - they refer to a letter that Talbot never got...but he got it in the theatrical version. You might indeed find the theatrical version more appealing.  |  IP: Logged Jeremy Jorgenson Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1002 From: Chicago, IL, USA Registered: Feb 2005 posted 06-12-2010 12:32 AM                        I screened this at work, back when it came out in February (incidentally, this is a 2010 release, not 2009) and I remember liking it a lot more than I was expecting.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.